Appearance - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: appearance Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.068 seconds)M/S. Mangal Singh and Others Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Jaipur
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-01-2001
1 none appeared on behalf of the appellants in spite of notice in the notice it was specifically mentioned to appellant to produce the proof in respect of deposit as per the stay order passed by the tribunal in view of these circumstances the appeals are dismissed for non compliance of the provisions of section 129e of the customs act
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCce, Jaipur Vs. M/S. Rishabh Dev Textitles
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-16-2001
..... m s rishabhdev textile s inspite of notice i also observe that no one has appeared on behalf of the respondents on 22nd december 2000 when the application was posted for .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Bata India Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Central
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Feb-19-2001
1 the matter was called shri s sudhakar c a appearing for the appellant submitted that he was directed by his clients to withdraw this case accordingly the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Uniworth Ltd. Vs. C.C.E. Bhopal
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2001
1 when the matter was called there was no one present for the appellants notice for hearing for this date was sent to the appellant on 4 1 2001 there is no communication from them either giving reasons for their absence or request for an adjournment it appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting their appeals the same are accordingly dismissed for non prosecution
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise, Vs. M/S Mico Ltd., Bangalore
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Feb-16-2001
..... shortage in the physical stock even as per the returns in question the ld appellant appears to have misconstrued the bonafide act of the respondents in paying an amount of rs .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Bhuwalka Steel Industries Vs. Customs and Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Feb-16-2001
..... decision in the case of ujagar prints is applicable 3 smt radha arun ld sdr appearing for the revenue submitted that the commissioner appeals was just right in holding that the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Tata Telecom Ltd, Palakad Vs. Commissioner of Customs and
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Feb-16-2001
..... and hence the same should be treated as assessable value 3 smt radha arun sdr appearing for the revenue submitted that most of the sales were at depot and from the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Gokak Mills Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Feb-16-2001
Reported in: (2001)(129)ELT523Tri(Bang.)
..... as union duty of excise 5 on the other hand smt radha arun ld sdr appearing for the revenue submitted that issue involved in this case has been clearly covered by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner Central Excise, Vs. M/S A.K. Automatics
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-16-2001
Reported in: (2001)(76)ECC696
..... the respondents of inspite of notice i also observe that the respondents had never earlier appeared when the matter was posted for hearing i therefore take the appeal for disposal after .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCharan Singh, Jagraj Singh Jai Vs. C.C. Lucknow
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2001
..... is felt that no useful purpose will be served by sending him another notice it appears that he is not interested in prosecuting his appeal his appeal is therefore dismissed for .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial