Skip to content


Appearance - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: appearance Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.068 seconds)
Jan 01 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Mangal Singh and Others Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Jaipur

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-01-2001

1 none appeared on behalf of the appellants in spite of notice in the notice it was specifically mentioned to appellant to produce the proof in respect of deposit as per the stay order passed by the tribunal in view of these circumstances the appeals are dismissed for non compliance of the provisions of section 129e of the customs act

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 16 2001 (TRI)

Cce, Jaipur Vs. M/S. Rishabh Dev Textitles

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Feb-16-2001

..... m s rishabhdev textile s inspite of notice i also observe that no one has appeared on behalf of the respondents on 22nd december 2000 when the application was posted for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 19 2001 (TRI)

M/S Bata India Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Feb-19-2001

1 the matter was called shri s sudhakar c a appearing for the appellant submitted that he was directed by his clients to withdraw this case accordingly the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 19 2001 (TRI)

M/S Uniworth Ltd. Vs. C.C.E. Bhopal

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Feb-19-2001

1 when the matter was called there was no one present for the appellants notice for hearing for this date was sent to the appellant on 4 1 2001 there is no communication from them either giving reasons for their absence or request for an adjournment it appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting their appeals the same are accordingly dismissed for non prosecution

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 16 2001 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. M/S Mico Ltd., Bangalore

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Feb-16-2001

..... shortage in the physical stock even as per the returns in question the ld appellant appears to have misconstrued the bonafide act of the respondents in paying an amount of rs .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 16 2001 (TRI)

M/S Bhuwalka Steel Industries Vs. Customs and Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Feb-16-2001

..... decision in the case of ujagar prints is applicable 3 smt radha arun ld sdr appearing for the revenue submitted that the commissioner appeals was just right in holding that the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 16 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Tata Telecom Ltd, Palakad Vs. Commissioner of Customs and

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Feb-16-2001

..... and hence the same should be treated as assessable value 3 smt radha arun sdr appearing for the revenue submitted that most of the sales were at depot and from the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 16 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Gokak Mills Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Feb-16-2001

Reported in: (2001)(129)ELT523Tri(Bang.)

..... as union duty of excise 5 on the other hand smt radha arun ld sdr appearing for the revenue submitted that issue involved in this case has been clearly covered by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 16 2001 (TRI)

Commissioner Central Excise, Vs. M/S A.K. Automatics

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Feb-16-2001

Reported in: (2001)(76)ECC696

..... the respondents of inspite of notice i also observe that the respondents had never earlier appeared when the matter was posted for hearing i therefore take the appeal for disposal after .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 20 2001 (TRI)

Charan Singh, Jagraj Singh Jai Vs. C.C. Lucknow

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Feb-20-2001

..... is felt that no useful purpose will be served by sending him another notice it appears that he is not interested in prosecuting his appeal his appeal is therefore dismissed for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //