Appear Before The Court - Judgment Search Results

Kerala High Court Non-Graduate Staff Vs. The High Court of Kerala and ...

Court: Kerala

R1 & R2 BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.RAMAPRASAD UNNI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON2506-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: VS WP(C).No. 31253 of 2011 (R) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Through Registrar and anr. Vs. Brij ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2003SC1459; 2003(2)ALT56(SC); [2003(96)FLR900]; JT2003(6)SC122; 2003(1)SCALE590; (2003)2SCC390; [2003]1SCR532; 2003(2)SLJ62(SC); (2003)2UPLBEC1887

judgment of the High Court, the appellants are before us in appeal. 5. Mr. U.U. Lalit, learned counsel appearing for the appellants contends that in terms of Judges Case-I : (1993)ILLJ723SC and Judges Case-II : (1993)IILLJ776SC ,

Rajasthan High Court Non-gazetted Ministerial Staff Association Throug ...

Court: Rajasthan

English to Hindi Translation 100 marksPaper-II Hindi to English Translation 100 marksExplanation: For the qualifying examination the official appearing shall be given passage for translation from English to Hindi and Hindi to English from the judgment and … Prakash Tatia, J.1. The petitioner Rajasthan High Court Non-Gazetted Ministerial Staff Association, Jodhpur has preferred this writ petition to challenge the order dated 8.9.2009 (Annex.7) of

High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Vs. Punjab and Haryana ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

appeal. (4).We have heard learned counsel for the parties at some length and gone through the record. It appears to us that due to intervening circumstances the matter requires sympathetic re-consideration viz. the penalty imposed on the … HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** LPA No.709 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision:23. 07.2013 **** Sudesh

Raj. High Court Adv.Clerks Asso.Soci. and Vs. Registrar General, Raj. ...

Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur

registration in certain eventualities, however, no provision is available to regulate service conditions of the Advocates' Clerks. It appears that the same has not been extended with assumption that the Advocate's Clerk is essentially an employee of … exercising powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India or otherwise. The significance of Advocates' Clerks in the court management is well known and well recognised and looking to that necessary provisions have been incorporated in several

High Court Bar Association, Allahabad Vs. Hon'ble High Court of Judica ...

Court: Allahabad

the learned Single Judge reads as follows: "By order dated 16.11.2006, this Court called upon Sri Pankaj Naqvi appearing for U.P. Bar Council to seek instructions whether 31st Dec 2006 be fixed as the last date for … an issue and then answer the same, although the issue may not arise for consideration in the proceedings before the Court? (c) Whether the High Court on judicial side can issue directions for regulating the entry, conduct and other

Delhi High Court Bar Association and Anr. Vs. Hon'ble Chief Justice Hi ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 50(1993)DLT532; 1993(26)DRJ99

involved in the writ petition the averments made in paras 27, 28, 29 and 30 of the petition appeared to be of no consequence. The learned Judge also said that since the Chief Justice in his official … Court be governed by these Rules. Then Rule 1 falling under Chapter Ii prescribes that every suit coming before the Court in its Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction shall be tried and heard by a Single Judge. Rules 2 under

Shamsundar and Court Vs. Sha Sunnilal Vesaji and Court and anr.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1962Kant12; AIR1962Mys12

entitled to rateable distribution. It is against this order that this revision petition is directed.(3) Mr. Seshagiri Rao appearing for the petitioner-decree-holder contends that the order of the court below rests upon a clear sub construction of … to their judgment-debtor and these movable were sold and the money realised by the sale was received by the court on March 17, 1959. By the time those assets were received by the court, both these decree-holders had

Court of Wards Dada Siba Estate and anr. Vs. Raja Dharan Dev Chand

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1961P& H143

English common law the doctrine of frustration operates to excuse further performance of the contract 'where (1) it appears from the nature of the contract and the surrounding circumstances that the parties have contracted on the basis … (at that time a minor) son of Raja Sham Singh of Dada Siba in Kangra District, was under the Court of Wards and inter alia owned five squares of land situated at Chak No. 2/1 AL, Tehsil Okara,

Shamsher Singh, Superintendent (Retd.), Punjab and Haryana High Court ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2010)157PLR528

made in that regard by the petitioner which was rejected by 22.08.2006. The submission of the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner is that when the Hon'ble Chief Justice passed an order stating that the period between … he was compulsory retired to 25.04.2006, when he actually rejoined the service pursuant to the order made by the Court, the whole period would be treated as 'period spent on duty for all purposes and intents and that