Apparent - Judgment Search Results

State of Punjab and ors. Vs. Appar Apar Singh

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1967P&H139

judge of this court allowing the petition of one shri apparapar singh under article 226 of the constitution of india challenging

Appar Apar Singh Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1970)IILLJ686SC; (1970)3SCC338; [1971]2SCR890; 1971(2)SLJ71(SC)

..... action with reference to the communication noted in the margin the personal file of shri appar apar singh is returned herewith please acknowledge receipt 2 accountant general punjab gadvi simla for ..... a dated chandigarh the 28th 29 th april 1964 a copy is forwarded to shri appar apar singh principal govt college muktsar for information and necessary action sd deputy secretary for .....

Krishna Kumar Sharma S/O Sri Bali Ram Sharma Vs. State of U.P. Through ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [2008(118)FLR711]

ashok bhushan j 1 heard sri anoop trivedi learned counsel for the petitioner and sri k k chand learned standing...

Jayaraman and Appar Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) Represented by the Se ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR2003Mad29; (2002)3MLJ732

..... case did not involve any substantial question of law is an error apparent on the face of the record the fact that on the ..... decision and a decision which could be characterised as vitiated by error apparent a review is by no means an appeal in disguise whereby an ..... there is a clear distinction between an erroneous decision and an error apparent on the face of the record while the first can be corrected .....

M. Raja Appar and Ors. Vs. M. Gnanasambandam (deceased by L.R's.)

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR2009Mad159; (2009)5MLJ210

..... in entirety to her 2 sons m gnanasambandam and m raja appar mrs parvatham subsequently died on 6 12 2003 one of the ..... agree to the joint development agreement therefore the other son m raja appar the surviving daughter madhuram lakshman and the legal heirs of the ..... m gnanasambandam the defendant in the present suit and m raja appar the first plaintiff in the present suit and that therefore he .....

“5. It Is Apparent from a Conjunctive Vs. Bakhtaur Singh and Another

Court: Punjab and Haryana

..... no 5 of the orders of the tribunal which are as follows 5 it is apparent from a conjunctive perusal of the pleadings raised by the parties that the respondents did .....

“as Is Apparent from the Pleadings of the Plaint as Vs. Subhash Chan ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

..... and decree dated 09 10 2012 the lower appellate court observed as under as is apparent from the pleadings of the plaint as set out by the appellant plaintiff that the .....

M.V.Appar Vs. Syndicate Bank, Rep.by Its Chairman and Ma

Court: Andhra Pradesh

no 16240 of 1999 dated 11 06 2013 m v apparao petitioner syndicate bank rep by its chairman amp managing director

Affronti Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

affronti v united states 350 u s 79 1955 u s supreme court affronti v united states 350 u s...

Abernathy Vs. Alabama

Court: US Supreme Court

abernathy v alabama 380 u s 447 1965 u s supreme court abernathy v alabama 380 u s 447 1965...