Apparent - Judgment Search Results
Appar Apar Singh Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-03-1970
Reported in: (1970)IILLJ686SC; (1970)3SCC338; [1971]2SCR890; 1971(2)SLJ71(SC)
writ petition was dismissed by the High Court on July 28, 1964.Order of the Governor of Punjab. Shri Appara par Singh, P.E.S. Class I (Officiating) Principal, Government College, Muktsar is reverted in P.E.S. Class II with immediate
Sri Chinnasamy Appar vs Sri Deepak P
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-17-2024
2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 1554 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI CHINNASAMY APPAR AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS S/O CHINNAWAMY RA/T NO. 13/22, DIAMOND STREET NSC BOSE NAGAR, PORUR CHENNAI 600 116.
M. Raja Appar and Ors. Vs. M. Gnanasambandam (deceased by L.R's.)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-10-2009
Reported in: AIR2009Mad159; (2009)5MLJ210
him surviving, (1) his wife Mrs. Parvatham Muthiah (2) 2 sons by name M. Gnanasambandam and M. Raja Appar and (3) 2 daughters by name Mrs. Uma Devi and Mrs. Madhuram Lakshman.4. Mrs. Parvatham Muthiah executed a
18-section briefs on any result in this list
M.V.Appar Vs. Syndicate Bank, Rep.by Its Chairman and Ma
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-11-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.16240 of 1999 Dated:11-06-2013 M.V.Apparao....Petitioner Syndicate Bank, rep.by its Chairman & Managing Director, Manipal South Camara District, Karnataka and two others.. Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri...
“as Is Apparent from the Pleadings of the Plaint as Vs. Subhash Chan ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-19-2014
the appeal vide its judgment and decree dated 09.10.2012, the lower appellate Court observed as under: “As is apparent from the pleadings of the plaint as set out by the appellant/plaintiff that the suit was filed for
Jayaraman and Appar Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) Represented by the Se ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-06-2002
Reported in: AIR2003Mad29; (2002)3MLJ732
order of September 1959 that the case did not involve any substantial question of law is an 'error apparent on the face of the record'. The fact that on the earlier occasion the Court held on an
A.Hemalatha Vs C.Appar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED AND A.Hemalatha W/o.Mr.P.Deepak, No.39, 5th Cross street, 9th main, Adithya Nagar, Vidyaranyapura, Bangalore-560097. ..Petitioner(s) Vs S/o.M.Chinnasamy, No.13/22, Diamond Street, NSC Bose Road, Porur,...
State of Punjab and ors. Vs. Appar Apar Singh Overruled
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-21-1966
Reported in: AIR1967P&H139
directed against the order of a learned Single Judge of this Court allowing the petition of one. Shri Apparapar Singh, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging his reversion from the officiating rank of Class
“5. It Is Apparent from a Conjunctive Vs. Bakhtaur Singh and Another
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-08-2013
behalf are contained in para No.5 of the orders of the Tribunal which are as follows:-“5. It is apparent, from a conjunctive perusal of the pleadings raised by the parties, that the respondents did not dispute the
Krishna Kumar Sharma S/O Sri Bali Ram Sharma Vs. State of U.P. Through ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-23-2008
Reported in: [2008(118)FLR711]
Ashok Bhushan, J.1. Heard Sri Anoop Trivedi learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri K.K. Chand, learned standing counsel.2. By this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free