Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Apparent - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 03 1970

Appar Apar Singh Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-03-1970

Reported in: (1970)IILLJ686SC; (1970)3SCC338; [1971]2SCR890; 1971(2)SLJ71(SC)

writ petition was dismissed by the High Court on July 28, 1964.Order of the Governor of Punjab. Shri Appara par Singh, P.E.S. Class I (Officiating) Principal, Government College, Muktsar is reverted in P.E.S. Class II with immediate


Jan 17 2024

Sri Chinnasamy Appar vs Sri Deepak P

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jan-17-2024

2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 1554 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI CHINNASAMY APPAR AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS S/O CHINNAWAMY RA/T NO. 13/22, DIAMOND STREET NSC BOSE NAGAR, PORUR CHENNAI 600 116.


Feb 10 2009

M. Raja Appar and Ors. Vs. M. Gnanasambandam (deceased by L.R's.)

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-10-2009

Reported in: AIR2009Mad159; (2009)5MLJ210

him surviving, (1) his wife Mrs. Parvatham Muthiah (2) 2 sons by name M. Gnanasambandam and M. Raja Appar and (3) 2 daughters by name Mrs. Uma Devi and Mrs. Madhuram Lakshman.4. Mrs. Parvatham Muthiah executed a


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 11 2013

M.V.Appar Vs. Syndicate Bank, Rep.by Its Chairman and Ma

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-11-2013

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.16240 of 1999 Dated:11-06-2013 M.V.Apparao....Petitioner Syndicate Bank, rep.by its Chairman & Managing Director, Manipal South Camara District, Karnataka and two others.. Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri...


May 19 2014

“as Is Apparent from the Pleadings of the Plaint as Vs. Subhash Chan ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-19-2014

the appeal vide its judgment and decree dated 09.10.2012, the lower appellate Court observed as under: “As is apparent from the pleadings of the plaint as set out by the appellant/plaintiff that the suit was filed for


Sep 06 2002

Jayaraman and Appar Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) Represented by the Se ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-06-2002

Reported in: AIR2003Mad29; (2002)3MLJ732

order of September 1959 that the case did not involve any substantial question of law is an 'error apparent on the face of the record'. The fact that on the earlier occasion the Court held on an


Jun 23 2026

A.Hemalatha Vs C.Appar

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-23-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED AND A.Hemalatha W/o.Mr.P.Deepak, No.39, 5th Cross street, 9th main, Adithya Nagar, Vidyaranyapura, Bangalore-560097. ..Petitioner(s) Vs S/o.M.Chinnasamy, No.13/22, Diamond Street, NSC Bose Road, Porur,...


Jul 21 1966

State of Punjab and ors. Vs. Appar Apar Singh Overruled

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-21-1966

Reported in: AIR1967P&H139

directed against the order of a learned Single Judge of this Court allowing the petition of one. Shri Apparapar Singh, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging his reversion from the officiating rank of Class


Feb 08 2013

“5. It Is Apparent from a Conjunctive Vs. Bakhtaur Singh and Another

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-08-2013

behalf are contained in para No.5 of the orders of the Tribunal which are as follows:-“5. It is apparent, from a conjunctive perusal of the pleadings raised by the parties, that the respondents did not dispute the


Jan 23 2008

Krishna Kumar Sharma S/O Sri Bali Ram Sharma Vs. State of U.P. Through ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jan-23-2008

Reported in: [2008(118)FLR711]

Ashok Bhushan, J.1. Heard Sri Anoop Trivedi learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri K.K. Chand, learned standing counsel.2. By this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial