Any Other Person - Judgment Search Results

Bush Vs. Person

Court: US Supreme Court

Bush v. Person - 59 U.S. 82 (1855) U.S. Supreme Court Bush v.

Tainwala Personal Care Products Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2002)(82)ECC642

1. When the petition for stay came up for hearing it was agreed by both sides that the appeal can...

Personal Manager, Sbi and anr. Vs. Krishna Grameena Bank Employees Uni ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(1)KarLJ62; (2008)ILLJ894SC; 2007(3)SCALE575; 2007AIRSCW7669; 2008–I-LLJ-894; 2008LabIC474; 2007(8)Supreme675; 2008(2)KLJ62; 2008(1)AIRKarR330

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court...

The Manager Personal Banking Division State Bank of India, Madras, Vs. ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2002)2MLJ280

P.D. Dinakaran, J.1. The petitioners in the revision and the appellants in the appeal are the defendants in O.S.No.4423 of...

Tainwala Personal Care Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Royal Sundaram Alliance ...

Court: Mumbai

Oral Judgment: 1. This application arises under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. In pursuance of a...

M/S. Personality Limited Vs. the Commissioner of Central Excise Bangal ...

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Per P. Karthikeyan This is an appeal filed by M/s. Personality Ltd., Rajaji Nagar, Bangalore. The impugned order sustained the order

The Authorized Person Coca-cola Company Products Ltd., Atmakuru Villag ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

marked. On behalf of the opposite party no.1, its authorized person has filed affidavit and did not choose to file any

Private Secretaries/Personal Assistants Brotherhood and Another Vs. St ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2000(1)AWC457; (2000)1UPLBEC357

Bearing No. 1408 of 1993 in re, Private Secretaries and Personal Assistants Brotherhood v. State of U. P. and another, was

a Person Aggrieved by an Order of Promoting a Vs. State of Punjab and ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

their extraordinary powers under Article 226 in the case of persons who do not approach it expeditiously for relief and who

“a Person Aggrieved by an Order of Promoting a Vs. State of Punjab a ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

extra ordinary powers under Article 226 in the case of persons who do not approach it expeditiously for relief and who