Ans V Union - Judgment Search Results
Excell Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. V. Union of India and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-06-1996
Reported in: 1996(3)BomCR447; (1996)98BOMLR257; 1996(85)ELT225(Bom)
No. 4 of 1968 was before the Supreme Court in the case of Ahura Chemical Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India 1982 ECR 625D (SC) : ECR C 649 SC : 1981 ELT 613 (S.C.). The appellant … the High Court without fulfilling the conditions under the amended provisions of the said Act. The Supreme Court answered the question in the negative as would be evident from the discussion in paragraphs 24 and 25 of
Crompton Greaves Ltd. Vs. V. Union of India
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-06-1996
Reported in: 1996(86)ELT205(Bom)
Cold Rolled Sheets so as to attract duty at the rate of Rs. 650/- per M.T. 16. In view of the above position, we are of the opinion that once it is found by both the authorities
Krishna Swami Vs. Union of India and Anotherwithraj Kanwar V. Union of ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-27-1992
Reported in: AIR1993SC1407; JT1992(5)SC92; 1992(1)SCALE484; (1992)4SCC605; [1992]Supp1SCR53
suffice to say that both these petitions are a sequel to the decision in Sub-Committee on Judicial Accountability v. Union of India and Ors. : AIR1992SC320 - and were filed prior to Writ Petition No. 514 of 1992-Mrs. … of judicial process impinging upon Article 21 as an unfair procedure. The Committee itself cross-examined the witnesses that answered favourably to the Judge. On the basis of the material placed before the court, he argued that the
18-section briefs on any result in this list
M/S. Binani Bros. (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors. M/S. Pragdas Ma ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-11-1973
Reported in: (1974)3CTR(SC)18
Bengal Finance Act, 1941 and the Central Sales-tax Act, 1956. The petitioner used to procure non-ferrous metals for various countries and also from within the country for fulfilling its contracts with the Government of India through the … metals for various countries and also from within the country for fulfilling its contracts with the Government of India through the DGS&D.; The import of non-ferrous metals was under Open General Licence till June 30, 1957. Thereafter,
Hitech (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors. Tico Machines (P) ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-27-1996
Reported in: (1997)143CTR(AP)305
by learned counsel, may not arise.Here, we may add that in Srikakollu Subba Rao & Co. vs . Union of India : [1988]173ITR708(AP) a Division Bench of this Court upheld the validity of s. 43B of the … 1992 which are representative of the facts in the other writ petitions.2. The petitioners are challenging the constitutional validity of s. 43B and s. 36(1)(va) of the IT Act, 1961, in so far as they provide for
Abdul Sattar Vs. Union of India and ors. (Also Chatisgarh Bidi Leaves ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-13-1996
Reported in: (1996)135CTR(MP)352
convenient disposal of all the aforesaid writ petitions, the facts given in Writ Petition No. 1059/1996, Abdul Sattar vs. Union of India & Ors. are taken into consideration.3. The petitioner by this petition has prayed for issuance
Raj Kumar and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors. (Dina Nath and ors. V. ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-02-1999
Reported in: [2000]242ITR584(P& H)
counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance on the decision of the Patna High Court in Santosh Verma v. Union of India : [1991]189ITR549(Patna) in this behalf. It would be apt to notice the relevant passage of this
Mr. Jalil Ahmed Ansari and anr. Vs. the Development Commissioner and o ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2001
Reported in: 2001IVAD(Delhi)838; 91(2001)DLT747; 2001(59)DRJ9
of the Court as no grounds have been mentioned in the earlier petition filed by Mr. Jalil Ahmed Ansari in C.W.P. NO.7770/2000 which have been taken in the subsequent petition filed by Mr. Madan Kaul.5. Mr. Rajiv … issued by respondent-Carpet Export Promotion Council notifying the schedule of election, date of issue of the list of valid nominations and issue of postal ballot papers were on 1.12.2000 and last date of the receipt of the … of the matters above, decision of the Development Commissioner (Handicrafts), Govt. of India, Ministry of Textiles, shall be final and binding.4. She further contended that
Jayamal Jayantilal Thakore Vs. Chief Commissioner of Income-tax and or ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-18-1997
Reported in: (1998)144CTR(Guj)384
exercising their powers under Art. 226.Relying upon the decision of the Supreme Court in Mohammed Anis vs . Union of India , it was contended that since the power of the apex Court under Art. 142(1) cannot … that the respondent No. 4 Mr. Shankarsinh Waghela earlier belonged to the Bharatiya Janata Party and with a view to overthrow the elected council of ministers, he had revolted 'with muscle and money power .....' and misusing
Ashok Leyland Finance Ltd. Vs. Appropriate Authority and ors. (Also P. ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-31-1997
Reported in: (1997)140CTR(Mad)346
Act 1961 s.269UD Head Note: INCOME TAX Compulsory purchase of immovable property by Central Government-- - CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Article 141; [A.P. Shah, C.J., F.M. Ibrahim Kaliffulla &V. Ramasubramanian, JJ] Reference to Larger Bench - Precedent - … UNDER S. 269UD--Petitioners failed to rebute presumption.Ratio:In the circumstances of the case, order passed under section 269UD was valid as petitioners have failed to rebute presumption arose as a consequence that undervaluation was with intent to evade
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free