Animals - Judgment Search Results

Charan Parashramji Meshram, Joint Director of Animal Husbandry Vs. Sta ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2005(3)ALLMR742

F.I. Rebello, J.1. Petitioner is presently working as Joint Director of animal husbandry, in the Maharashtra Animal Husbandry services under Respondent no. 2, Pune. The petitioner holds qualification of B.Sc.

Brooke Hospital for Animals and ors. Vs. Brook Hospital for Animals (I ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 155(2008)DLT305

as a Charity bearing No. 1085760, set up with the object of improving the condition and welfare of animals, particularly equine animals. The petitioner No. 2 is the erstwhile Chairman of the Animal Welfare Board constituted under

Animal Welfare Board of India Vs. A. Nagaraja and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

We are, in these cases, concerned with an issue of seminal importance with regard to the Rights of Animals under our Constitution, laws, culture, tradition, religion and ethology, which we have to examine, in connection with the

The Animal Welfare Board of India Vs. Union of India

Court: Supreme Court of India

and Ors. (2014) 7 SCC547 2. However, while these writ petitions were pending, The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 2017, which received the Presidential assent on 31st January, 2017, was passed. The writ

The Animal Welfare Board Of India Vs. Union Of India

Court: Supreme Court of India

to be contrary to the provisions of Sections 3, 11(1)(a) and (m) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 (“1960 Act”) which is a Statute enacted by the Parliament. The two Judge Bench had construed

Animal and Environment Legal Defence Fund Vs. Union of India and Other ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1997SC1071; JT1997(3)SC298; 1997(2)SCALE493; (1997)3SCC549; [1997]2SCR728

damaging to the ecology of the area. There is also a danger of large scale poaching of wild animals. The National Park is also a tiger reserve and all these other activities have a direct bearing on

Sanjay Gandhi Animal Care Centre Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Delhi. In his statement the complainant stated that he is the President of Raiding Party of People for Animals and on 2nd August, 2014 he received an information that some sheep and goats are being taken to

Vismayas Max Animation Academy Vs. Mahathma Gandhi University

Court: Kerala

FRIDAY, THE11H DAY OF SEPTEMBER201520TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 16435 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------- PETITIONER : ------------------ VISMAYAS MAX ANIMATION ACADEMY, HILL TOP MANOR, DIAMOND HILL, VELLAYAMBALAM P.O., TRIVANDRUM, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR K.D.SHYBU. BY ADVS.SRI.S.CHANDRASEKHARAN NAIR SRI.RAJU

Sanjay Gandhi Animal Care Centre Vs. Saddan and Another

Court: Delhi

modifying the order dated 16.11.2015 passed in Crl. Rev. P. 185/2015 to the extent that the release of animals must be conditional. 2. Further seeks directions to allow the custody of the animals pursuant to order dated

Sanjay Gandhi Animal Care Center vs.state of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court: Delhi

two trucks were stopped by the persons namely, Amarjeet and Suman acting on behalf of NGO, People for animals. Both these persons called the police and made complaint to the police for registering a case against the