And Selden V Equitable - Judgment Search Results

Selden Vs. Equitable Trust Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Selden v. Equitable Trust Co. - 94 U.S. 419 (1876) U.S. Supreme Court Selden v. Equitable Trust Co., 94 U.S. 419 … Selden v. Equitable Trust Co. - 94 U.S. 419 (1876) U.S. Supreme Court Selden v. Equitable Trust Co., 94 U.S. 419 (1876) Selden v. Equitable Trust Co. 94 U.S. 419 ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT

Richmond Vs. Blake

Court: US Supreme Court

S. 596 In support of this position, the plaintiff cites Warren v. Shook, 91 U. S. 704 , and Selden v. Equitable Trust Co., 94 U. S. 419 . In the first of those cases, the question was whether a

international News Service Vs. Associated Press

Court: US Supreme Court

; Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony, 111 U. S. 53 , 111 U. S. 58 -60; Baker v. Selden, 101 U. S. 99 , 101 U. S. 105 -106; Clayton v. Stone, 2 Paine, 382, Fed.Cas. No. … & Co., L.R. 25 Q.B.D. 99; Pike v. Nicholas, L.R. 5 Ch.App. 251. [ Footnote 8 ] Bristol v. Equitable Life Assurance Society, 132 N.Y. 264; Haskins v. Ryan, 71 N.J.Eq. 575. [ Footnote 9 ] Jewelers' mercantile

Rama Rao and Another Vs. Bashu Khan Saheb and Two Others

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1998(2)CTC363; (1998)IIIMLJ605

not aware of the law. It is elementary that ignorance of law is no excuse. To quote John Selden 'Ignorance of the law excuses no man; not that all men know the law. It is an excuse … the Contract Act, but that Section did not confer a right of equitable charge on the plaintiffs. In Pulavarti Sitaramamurty's case : (1950)2MLJ505 relied upon … below are the appellants herein. The suit O.S. No.1175 of 1978 was filed in the District Munsifs' Court, Villupuram, for passing a preliminary decree and final decree directing the defendants to pay the plaintiffs, personally and also

Lonchar Vs. Thomas

Court: US Supreme Court

422 U. S. 405 , 417 (1975); The Federalist No. 78, p. 528 (J. Cooke ed. 1961). As Selden pointed out so many years ago, the alternative is to use each equity chancellor's conscience as a measure … Lonchar v. Thomas - 517 U.S. 314 (1996) OCTOBER TERM, 1995 Syllabus LONCHAR v. THOMAS, WARDEN CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED … his first. Reasoning that federal Habeas Corpus Rule 9, not some generalized equitable authority to dismiss, governed the case, the District Court held that Lonchar's

Seymour Vs. Freer

Court: US Supreme Court

[ Footnote 7 ] 65 U. S. 24 How. 536. [ Footnote 8 ] Anderson v. Lemon, 4 Selden 236. MR. JUSTICE FIELD delivered the following dissenting opinion. MR. JUSTICE NELSON, MR. JUSTICE GRIER, and myself dissent … burden of proof as to such relinquishment resting with the heirs of Seymour. iii. That the principle of equitable conversion being applied to the case, and the land which was to be converted into money, being regarded

Allen Vs. Hanks

Court: US Supreme Court

according to the common law, unless the wife was seised in fact and in deed. Mercer's Lessee v. Selden, 1 How. 37, 42 U. S. 54 ; Davis v. Mason, 1 Pet. 503, 26 U. S. 507 … the debts of the husband. (6) It is the right of those who have a clear legal and equitable title to land connected with possession to claim the interference of a court of equity to give them

United States Vs. Dubilier Condenser Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

Electric Service Engineering Corp., 18 F.2d 662; Hazeltine Corp. v. A. H. Grebe & Co., 21 F.2d 643; Selden Co. v. National Aniline & Chemical Co., 48 F.2d 270. [ Footnote 17 ] 45 Stat. 467, 468. … 342 ; Lane & Bodley Co. v. Locke, 150 U. S. 193 . This is an application of equitable principles. Since the servant uses his master's time, facilities, and materials to attain a Page 289 U. S.

Snead Vs. Mccoull

Court: US Supreme Court

seal, the widow and two eldest children of McCoull, in consideration of $1,000, transferred and surrendered to William Selden a certain part of the Marion Hill tract, it being agreed that if they should within six years … Snead v. McCoull - 53 U.S. 407 (1851) U.S. Supreme Court Snead v. McCoull, 53 U.S. 12 How. 407 407 … him, and states that, being aware of many outstanding encumbrances upon the equitable right, he has endeavored to take in those encumbrances which gave preferable

Kann Vs. King

Court: US Supreme Court

payment or tender of all arrears of rent and interest by a defaulting lessee, is elementary. Sheets v. Selden, 7 Wall. 416. But that principle cannot control this case even if it be conceded, for the sake … lessor) and Louis Kann, Sigmund Kann, and Myer Cohen, whom it was alleged claimed to be either the equitable or legal owners of the tax title in question. The defendant Kennedy died the day the bill was