Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

And Others V E R - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 28 1967

V.E.R.S. Ramaswamy Chettiar Vs. Assistant Engineer and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-28-1967

Reported in: (1968)2MLJ171

ORDERP. Ramakrishnan, J. 1. The petitioner claims to be the owner of S. No. 357/791 in Thuraiyur village, adjoining the bazaar road which bears S. No. 384. The predecessor-in-title of the petitioner purchased the property in … petitioner purchased the property in Court auction and also obtained a sale certificate on 9th June, 1933 in execution of a decree on a mortgage. The petitioner got the property in a subsequent partition and has been … ORDERP. Ramakrishnan, J. 1. The petitioner claims to be the owner of S. No.


Mar 15 1938

V.E.R.M.K. Krishnan Chettiar by Agent Rama Aiyangar Vs. Velayee Ammal

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-15-1938

Reported in: AIR1938Mad604; (1938)2MLJ22

his or her relation with the proposer. In this case the words entered were, ' self or wife Velayammal ' (the name of the respondent). The proposal was accepted and a policy was issued on the 5th … Company, Ltd., a proposal for a policy of insurance on his own life. The proposal was for an endowment policy for Rs. 5,000 payable in 15 years. Clause 12 of the proposal is intended to contain the … Alfred Henry Lionel Leach, C.J.1. This appeal raises the question of what is meant by the word ' policy' in


Feb 06 1942

V.E.R.M.K. Krishnan Chettiar by Agent Rama Aiyangar Vs. Nachimuthu Gou ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-06-1942

Reported in: AIR1942Mad453; (1942)1MLJ500

revision petitions obtained a decree for Rs. 4,678 against the respondent on 23rd October, 1930 and, after recovering various amounts from time to time, applied on 7th January, 1938 for execution of the decree in E.P. No. … Patanjali Sastri, J.1. The petitioner in these connected civil revision petitions obtained a decree for Rs. 4,678 against the respondent on 23rd October, 1930 and, after recovering various


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 30 1939

V.E.R.M.K. Krishnan Chettiar by Agent Rama Ayyangar Vs. P.L.P. Devaray ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-30-1939

Reported in: AIR1940Mad228; (1940)1MLJ786

was pressure exercised by the creditor in whose favour the mortgage deed was executed. This document is Ex. V which would show that the mortgagee was pressing the mortgagor for payment of the debts which both the … and 54 of the Provincial Insolvency Act to annul, on the ground of fraudulent preference a mortgage deed executed by a person whose estate was, after his death, adjudicated insolvent. The mortgage deed was executed on the … Kunhi Raman, J.1. This is a petition to revise the order of the learned


Aug 28 1931

V.E.R. Subbaraya Chettiar and ors. Vs. Sellamuthu Asari

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-28-1931

Reported in: AIR1933Mad184

of it. I am unable to agree. The case cited to me as authority for this position, Saradamba v. Pattabhiramayya A.I.R. 1931 Mad 207, to which I was a party, only decided that where a deposition of … This second appeal is taken upon three points. The first is whether the room A (2) is the exclusive property of the plaintiff or is common to him and the defendants. The lower Courts have relied upon


Nov 21 1922

V.S. Natesa Chettiar Vs. V.E.R.M. Annamalai Chettiar by His Authorised ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-21-1922

Reported in: 73Ind.Cas.213

the appellant was adjudicated insolvent; and under Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, the introduction of Act V of 1920, which repealed Act III of 1907, could not take away his right.4. The District Judge's order … objection to the assignment of the decree being recognized and to its transmission to the Tiruvalur Court for execution, precluded the judgment-debtor from raising the question in the Executing Court that the decree was not then executable … the omission to take objection to the assignment of the decree being recognized and to its transmission to the Tiruvalur Court for execution, precluded the


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial