And Co Ltd V State - Judgment Search Results

Saraswat Co-op. Bank Employees Union Vs. V. State of Maharashtra and o ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1996(5)BomCR122; [1996(74)FLR1945]; (1997)ILLJ232Bom; 1996(2)MhLj10

31 in Form-I before April 30 of the following year. The returns for the year 1991 and 1992 could not be filed by the petitioner. A notice dated December 17, 1993 was sent by the Registrar of … prepared on March 8, 1994. The learned counsel for petitioner submits that this action of the respondent is vitiated by non application of mind and hence illegal. Be that as it may, we do not propose to … not filed the returns and also calling for the explanation. It also stated that if the explanation is not filed within two months the registration

Sharadchandra Vinayak Dongre, and Others Etc. Vs. V. State of Maharash ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1991CriLJ3329

the parties at length, I had passed the following operative order on 1st February 1990 :- 'Heard Mr. V. R. Manohar with Mr. Rahimatoola and Mr. S. V. Manohar for the Petitioners and Mr. Gangakhedkar, A.P.P. for … S. V. Manohar for the Petitioners and Mr. Gangakhedkar, A.P.P. for the State-Respondent. For reasons stated in the accompanying judgment, the Rule is made absolute … judgment, the Rule is made absolute to the extent that the order of issue of process and taking cognizance of the offence is quashed and set aside as also the order of condonation of delay. Writ be

M. Vs. Chacko V. State of Madras.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1968]70ITR801(Mad)

interest, which was disallowed by the revenue as well as the Tribunal. The assessee accordingly has moved this court in revision and the following question arise for consideration :'(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances … VEERASWAMI J. - The petition relates to the assessment year 1959-60 under the Madras Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1955. The

Om NaraIn Agarwal and Others Vs. Nagar Palika, Shahjahanpur and Others ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1993SC1440; JT1993(4)SC483; 1993(1)SCALE663; (1993)2SCC242; [1993]2SCR34; (1993)2UPLBEC817

the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Writ Petition No. 1067 of 1991 Prem Kumar Balmiki v. State of U.P. by order dated 13.11.1991 held that the fourth proviso to Section 9 of the Act was … ORDERN.M. Kasliwal, J. 1. Special leave granted.2. As common questions of fact and law are involved in all the above cases, as such they are disposed of

Morvi Municipality Vs. State of Gujarat and ors. (Ca No. 1374 of 1974) ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1993)112CTR(SC)448

be imposed. -(1) Subject to any general or special orders which the State Government may make in this behalf and the provisions of ss. 101 … Appeal No. 1374/1974Some tax-payers of the appellant-Morvi Municipality (the Municipality) had filed a writ petition in the High Court challenging the validity of the rules made by it for the levy of consolidated property tax on lands … tax-payers of the appellant-Morvi Municipality (the Municipality) had filed a writ petition in the High Court challenging the validity of the rules made by it for the levy of consolidated property tax on lands and buildings and

M/S. Vs. Gunaviah Naidu and Sons Etc. V. State of Tamil Nadu and anr. ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1977)6CTR(SC)14

the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the State Act.)2. The appellants are dealers in hides and skins. The appellants purchase … Khanna, J. - These appeals by special leave are against the judgment of Madras High Court whereby that court repelled the challenge to the validity of items 7(a) and 7(b) of the Second Schedule … special leave are against the judgment of Madras High Court whereby that court repelled the challenge to the validity of items 7(a) and 7(b) of the Second Schedule to the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959 (hereinafter

M/S. Balabhagas Hulaschand Vs. State of OrissA. (Civil Appeals Nos. 44 ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1976)5CTR(SC)175

India Jute and Hessian Exchange Ltd., and the buyers were the Managing Agents of the firm Kittlewell-Bullen & Co. Ltd. Calcutta. A letter has been produced by the parties which appears at p. 24 of the Paper Book … the same firm in respect of the sales tax levied by the State of Orissa for the quarters ending December, 1959, March, 1960 and December, … previous judgment, which is the subject-matter of the six appeals mentioned above and held that the levy was valid. The points of law arising in these appeals also are identical to the points arising in the other

1. Ansi Devi V. State of Jandk; and ors. Vs. State of J and K and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

JAMMU. OWP No. 654 OF 200.AND OWP No. 228 OF 200.AND OWP No. 229 OF 200.1. Ansi Devi v. State of J&K and ors.2. Kailash v. State of J&K and ors.3. Balo v. State of J&K and ors.4. … HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU. OWP No. 654 OF 200.AND OWP No. 228 OF 200.AND OWP No.

Lajja Ram and ors. V. State of Haryana Vs. Unknown

Court: Punjab and Haryana

: Mr.B.S.Saroha, Advocate for the applicant/appellant No.1- Lajja Ram. Mr.H.S.Deol, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr.Sanjay Jain, Advocate for the complainant. *** Learned State counsel has filed affidavit of Sh. Rattan Singh, Superintendent, Central Jail, Ambala mentioning the period … Kumar and Malkiat Singh (appellants in CRA not D-477- DB of 2012).Their sentences of imprisonment have been suspended vide order dated 26.9.2012 (Annexure P2) passed in CRM No.34317 of 2012 in (202) CRM No.72418 of 2012 in

Jasvir Kaur @ Gogi V. State of Punjab Vs. Unknown

Court: Punjab and Haryana

(202) CRM No.62062 of 2012 in [1].CRA not D-25-DB of 2011 Jasvir Kaur @ Gogi v. State of Punjab Present : Mr.Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate for the applicant/appellant. Mr.S.S.Dhaliwal, Addl. A.G., Punjab. *** Learned State counsel … State of Punjab Present : Mr.Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate for the applicant/appellant. Mr.S.S.Dhaliwal, Addl. A.G., Punjab. *** Learned State counsel has filed affidavit of Sh. Davinder Kumar Sidhu, PPS, Superintendent, Central Jail, Ferozepur mentioning the period of imprisonment