Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Ancient - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial to open GPT-powered briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results — plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 09 2019

Ancient Infra-Tech (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs.national Buildings Construction Corp ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-09-2019

OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI I.P.A. 1/2019 & IA No.1324/2019 ANCIENT INFRA-TECH (PVT.) LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarun Vaid, Advocate


Jul 29 2019

M/S Ancient Infratech (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs.m/s National Building Constructio ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-29-2019

COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) (COMM) 180/2019 M/S ANCIENT INFRATECH (PVT.) LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D.S. Chauhan Ms.


Jan 30 2006

Ancient Bihar Cold Storage and anr. Vs. Managing Director, Bihar State ...

Court: Patna

Decided on: Jan-30-2006

J.N. Bhatt, C.J.1. It is really very surprising that in this appeal the original plaintiffs have assailed, rather, an unusual...


Turn these results into brief-ready notes

Nov 30 1998

M/S. Ancient Investment Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Kotak Securities and ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-30-1998

Reported in: 1999(1)ALLMR538; 1999(5)BomCR107; 1999BomCR(Cri)107

ORDERD.G. Deshpande, J.1. Heard Mr. Khandeparkar for the petitioner and Mr. Amit Desai for the respondent No. 1 complainant. Petitioners...


Jun 03 1929

Ancient Egyptian Arabic Order Vs. Michaux

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-03-1929

Ancient Egyptian Arabic Order v. Michaux - 279 U.S. 737 (1929)


Feb 15 2011

Commissioner of Central Excise, Madurai Vs. Ancient Pharma

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Decided on: Feb-15-2011

Per Jyoti Balasundaram 1. The brief facts of the case are that the assessees herein, who are engaged in the...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

Try AI Brief & Semantic Search — 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial