Anchor - Judgment Search Results
Anchor Industries Employees' Union Vs. Anchor Industries and 33 Ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-01-2002
Reported in: (2003)3BOMLR698
one of the partner namely, Ramji Lalji Shah took over the trade mark of the dissolved firm 'M/s. Anchor Industries'. So the trade mark being the brand name was allowed to be used only by one partner
Anchor Pressings (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, U.P. and ors ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-16-1986
Reported in: AIR1987SC575; (1986)58CTR(SC)126; 1987(27)ELT590(SC); [1986]161ITR159(SC); 1986(2)SCALE86; (1986)3SCC439; [1986]3SCR223; 1986(2)LC519(SC)
Matched in: Parties Anchor Pressings (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, U.P. and ors.
Anchor Breweries Limited Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:15. 02.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR W.P.No.3402 of 2007 M/s.Anchor Breweries Limited Rep. by its Managing Director R.Srinivasan 43, Brindavan Street Extension West Mambalam, Chennai-33 .....
18-section briefs on any result in this list
M/S.Anchor Structurals Vs. the Kerala State Electricity Board
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-06-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY,THE6H DAY OF JANUARY201416TH POUSHA, 1935 WP(C).No. 31147 of 2013 (P) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S) : ---------------------- M/S.ANCHOR STRUCTURALS, ENGINEERS & CONTRACTORS, ELOOR HOUSE,...
Anchor Electricals (P) Ltd Vs. Commissioner Sales Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2014
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:20. 03.2014 + ST.APPL. 45/2012 ANCHOR ELECTRICALS (P) LTD Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Aseem Mehrotra, Adv. versus COMMISSIONER SALES TAX Through: ..... Respondent Mr.V.K.Tandon, Adv.
Anchor Offshore Services Ltd. (AOSL) Vs. Oil and Natural Gas Corporati ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
Gas Corporation Limited ( ONGC ). By this order (Exhibit A , pages 86 to 87A)the Petitioner ( Anchor ) has been banned from all business dealings with ONGC for two years. The ostensible reason for this
Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pvt. Ltd. Vs.state and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2019
3946/2014, 3459/2015 to 3464/2015 & 3770/2016 Page 1 of 35 versus Raghav Pandey & Ms. Anusha Nagraj, Advocates.1. ANCHOR HEALTH AND BEAUTY CARE PVT. LTD. Office No 201, C Wing, Marathon Nextgen, GK Marg, Opposite Peninsula Corporate
Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pvt. Ltd. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi and O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2019
3946/2014, 3459/2015 to 3464/2015 & 3770/2016 Page 1 of 35 versus Raghav Pandey & Ms. Anusha Nagraj, Advocates.1. ANCHOR HEALTH AND BEAUTY CARE PVT. LTD. Office No 201, C Wing, Marathon Nextgen, GK Marg, Opposite Peninsula Corporate
M/S. Anchor Infrastructure Represented by Managing Partner Raju M. Itt ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Apr-03-2023
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY MONDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2023 / 13TH CHAITHRA, 1945 PETITIONER/S: M/S. ANCHOR INFRASTRUCTURE, 9/5382B, 10th CROSS ROAD, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, COCHIN, PIN - 682036 REPRESENTED BY MANAGING PARTNER RAJU M. ITTY
Muthoot Anchor House Hotels Private Limited vs State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-16-2023
THURSDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 25TH KARTHIKA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 17778 OF 2022 PETITIONER: MUTHOOT ANCHOR HOUSE HOTELS PRIVATE LIMITED COMPLEX, BANERJI ROAD, ERNAKULAM - 682 018, REPRESENTED BY ITS OPERATIONS-IN-CHARGE AND AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free