Amend - Judgment Search Results
Amended Cwp No. 1022 of 2010 Vs. State of Haryana and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Amended CWP No.1022 of 2010 Date of Decision :23. 11.2012 Ram
Amended Cwp No.9201 of 1994 Vs. State of Punjab and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-29-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Amended CWP No.9201 of 1994 Date of decision:29. 11.2012 Gurbax Singh
Amended Cwp No.3754 of 1994 Vs. Municipal Committee and Another
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-13-2012
Amended CWP No.3754 of 1994 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT
Turn these results into brief-ready notes
Amendment Sought in His Written Statement by the Petitioner- Vs. Ashok ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-14-2014
for the petitioner. **** Dr.Bharat Bhushan Parsoon, J. (Oral) 1. Amendment sought in his written statement by the petitioner- tenant has
In Re Amendment to Rule 39
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-29-1991
In re Amendment to Rule 39 - 500 U.S. 13 (1991) U.S. Supreme
Vinjamuri Venkatanarasimhacharyulu Vs. Jami Gangaraju (Amended As) Gan ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-30-1940
Reported in: AIR1941Mad607; (1941)1MLJ554
Patanjali Sastri, J.1. This revision petition raises an interesting question of law on which it is said there is no...
In Re: the Bill to Amend S. 20 of the Sea Customs Act, 1878 and S. 3 o ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-10-1963
Reported in: [1964]3SCR787
draft of which is annexed here to andmarked 'Annexure', to amend for the purpose aforesaid sub-section (2) ofsection 20 of the
Ascent Constructions Pvt. Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under the Compan ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2007
Reported in: I(2008)BC472; 2008(103)DRJ118
V.B. Gupta, J.1. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of the proceedings pending...
“no Doubt That the Law for Amendment of Plaint Quite Liberal but at ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
the suit, the plaintiff filed an application (Annexure P2) for amendment of plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC. Defendant No.2
Though Section 11 Has Been Subsequently Amended Vide Act Vs. Gram Panc ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-22-2014
which came to be vested in Panchayat consequent to the amendment in the Act by Haryana Act No.9 of 1992. The
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Try AI Brief & Semantic Search — 7 days free