Am Ltd V Asstt - Judgment Search Results
Assistant Commissioner Wealth Tax Vs. Sultan Brothers (P) Ltd. (Also S ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-03-1996
Reported in: (1997)58TTJ(Mumbai)562
Matched in: Parties Assistant Commissioner Wealth Tax Vs. Sultan Brothers (P) Ltd. (Also Sultan Brothers (P) Ltd. V. Asstt. Cwt).
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. G. S. BhatiA. (Also G. S. Bha ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: May-27-1997
Reported in: (1997)59TTJ(Mumbai)91
Matched in: Parties Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. G. S. BhatiA. (Also G. S. Bhatia V. Asstt. Cit.).
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Meghraj GolechA. (Meghraj Gol ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-12-1996
Reported in: (1997)57TTJ(Mumbai)209
cases of Laduram Laxminarayan vs. Addl. ITO & Ors. (1976) 102 ITR 599 , East Coast Commercial Co. Ltd. vs . ITO : [1981]128ITR326(Cal) and Govind Chaudhary vs . ITO & Ors. : [1977]109ITR370(Orissa) to support his … of the Supreme Court in the case of Ghanshyamdas vs . Regional Asstt. CST & Ors. : [1964]51ITR557(SC) to support his argument that income cannot … ORDERJ. K. VERMA, A. M. :All these cross-appeals and cross-objections arise from a common order of CIT(A) in the above-mentioned assessment
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sak Industries (P.) Ltd. (Sak ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-19-1993
Reported in: (1994)49TTJ(Del)457
Matched in: Parties Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sak Industries (P.) Ltd. (Sak Industries Pvt. Ltd. V. Asstt. Cit).
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Snia Fibre Spa (Snia Fibre Sp ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-13-1996
Reported in: (1996)55TTJ(Del)554
the assessed is a foreign company based in Italy. It had entered into an agreement with M/s Modipon Ltd. on 21st Jan., 1983, which was subsequently approved by the Government of India. The account period of the … in appeal before the learned CIT(A) when it was submitted that the rate of exchange for calculation of value in rupees should be telegraphic buying rate as on the date on which the tax is required to
Babu Ram Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax. (Also Prabhu Dayal ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-1997
Reported in: (1997)59TTJ(Del)105
Appa Rao : [1975]2SCR32 3. P. V. Doshi vs. CIT : [1978]113ITR22(Guj) and4. Delhi Cloth & Gen. Mills Ltd. vs. R. R. Gupta : AIR1977SC2086 .We have given careful thought to the aforesaid submissions and examined impugned
Master Abhinav Malhotra and anr. V Asstt. Cit
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2003
Reported in: (2004)89TTJ(Del)144
Reliance has been placed on the Apex Court decision in the case of CIT v. Orissa Corporation (P) Ltd. : [1986]159ITR78(SC) and in the case of Nathu Ram Prem Chand v. CIT : [1963]49ITR561(All) .9. It was … a view has been entertained by the Chandigarh Bench of the Tribunal in the case of R.K. Sayal v. Asstt. CIT ITA No. 1165/Chd/1996, dated 11-2-1999 as also in another case of Jawahar Lal 0swal v. Assn. CIT
S. A. Growth Fund (P) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax. ( ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-1997
Reported in: (1997)59TTJ(Del)384
of the above sum in terms of the Bearer Bonds Act. The Asstt. CIT however, asked the assessed to explain the source of the funds … were identical. Accordingly, arguments were heard in ITA No. 673 in the case of S.A. Growth Fund (P) Ltd.The facts in brief are that the assessee, a private limited company was incorporated on 11th February, 1991. It … 2,000 per bond. The total amount realised by the assessed on such redemption was :Rs.(i) Against the face value of Rs. 10,000 per bond (885 bonds) 88,50,000(ii) As premium of Rs. 2000 per bond for 885 bonds
Jayanti Lal Patel Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and ors. (A ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Oct-01-1997
Reported in: (1997)142CTR(Raj)571
has also been treated as income from unexplained sources. Similarly, after raid, enquiry has been made by the Asstt. CIT before order under s. 132(5), the statements of seller of plot and agent through whom the plot … s. 132(5) of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter, referred as the Act) has been passed and therein the view has been taken that Shri Jayanti Lal Patel is owner of these 3 FDRs and not Dr. Tomar.
V. Anandmull JaIn (indl.) Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Al ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-28-1994
Reported in: (1996)54TTJ(Mad)50
fact that, in similar circumstances, following the Supreme Court case of Sir Shadi Lal Sugar & General Mills Ltd. & Anr. vs . CIT : [1987]168ITR705(SC) , the Tribunal had cancelled the penalties levied in an earlier … a common order.2. The aforesaid assessees are members of one and the same group doing business in money-lending, vehicle financing, sale of fertilizers and hulling of paddy. This group was subjected to search and seizure operations on
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free