Allotment - Judgment Search Results
“subject: Allotment of a Chop/Booth on Compassionate Basis. Vs. Stat ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
in harness on 19.9.2004. The petitioner is her son. There are chemist shops in the hospital open to allotment. A policy was framed by the Punjab Government notified on 8.9.2004 which permitted allotment of shops/booths/space in medical/dental/ayurvedic
Mr. Ashish Rajput vs the Chamber Allotment Committee & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2026
NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2324/2026 and CM APPL. 5124/2020 MR. ASHISH RAJPUT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Saksham Gupta, AdvocateversusTHE CHAMBER ALLOTMENT COMMITTEE & ANR......Respondents Through: Mr. Sameer Vashisht, Standing Counsel for GNCTDCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 29.05.2026 The
Sh Piyush Gupta Advocate vs the Chamber Allotment Committee & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-24-2026
Through: Mr. Rajat Malhotra, Mr. Sudhanshu Sharma, Mr. Saksham Bansal, Ms. Kamayni Tripathi, Ms. Yamini Bansal, Advs.versusTHE CHAMBER ALLOTMENT COMMITTEE & ORS......Respondent Through: Mr. Sameer Vashisht, Standing Counsel (Civil), GNCTD with Ms. Harshita Nathrani, Adv and Ms.
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Karan Singh Kardam Vs. the Chambers Allotment Committee and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2013
10, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2819/2012 KARAN SINGH KARDAM Represented by: ..... Petitioner Petitioner in person versus THE CHAMBERS ALLOTMENT COMMITTEE & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.
Yash Pal Sapra Vs. Lawyers Chambers Allotment Committee Rohini Court
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
YASH PAL SAPRA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mahipal Singh Rajput, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus LAWYERS CHAMBERS ALLOTMENT COMMITTEE ROHINI COURT COMPLEX AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. V.K. Tandon, Advocate for respondent No.1. Reserved on
Kanhaya Lal Vs. House Allotment Committee, Chandigarh Administration a ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-30-1997
Reported in: (1997)117PLR381
of orders dated 11.3.1991 (Annexure P2) and dated 22.3.1991 (An-nexure P5) passed by the Secretary and Chairman, House Allotment Committee, Chandigarh Administration, Chandigarh, respectively. Petitioner-Kanhaya Lal was working as a peon in the Animal Husbandry Department, Chandigarh,
Harihar Ramchandra Sansthan Vs. House Allotment Officer and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-17-1987
Reported in: 1989(3)BomCR160
short the Rent Control Order). The suit premises were allotted to the respondent No. 2 by the House Allotment Officer under Clauses 23 and 24 of the Rent Control Order as per the impugned order dated 26-4-1985,
Baroundeb Harisadan Mukerjee Vs. House Allotment Officer
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-28-1983
Reported in: (1983)85BOMLR163
name of the deceased Harisadan. The tenancy is not yet determined, 2. Could under these circumstances the House Allotment Officer in exercise of the powers conferred under Clause 28 of the C.P. and Berar Letting of Houses
Jagabandhu Jena and ors. Vs. Land Allotment Committee and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Apr-30-1984
Reported in: AIR1986Ori143
Mohapatra, J.1. In this writ petition the petitioners seek to challenge the allotment of Government lands in the civil township of Rourkela to be in contravention of the rules framed by
“The petitioner's grievance Is that though allotments were Vs. Satbi ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
of some dispute having arisen, in the meantime, inter-se the members of the Gram Panchayat. To prove that allotment was made to the petitioneRs.reference was made to the a letter Annexure P-1, issued in favour of one
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free