Allegedly - Judgment Search Results
In Re: Alleged Rape And Murder Incident Of A Trainee Doctor In R.g. Ka ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-20-2024
RG Kar Medical College Hospital, Kolkata who was on a thirty six hour duty shift was murdered and allegedly raped inside the seminar room of the hospital. As horrific details have emerged in the course of media
Bhoop Alleged Son of Sheo Vs. MatadIn Bhardwaj
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-04-1990
Reported in: AIR1991SC373; 1991(1)BLJR603; JT1990(4)SC594; 1990(2)SCALE1204; (1991)2SCC128; [1990]Supp3SCR410; 1991(1)LC247(SC)
A.M. Ahmadi, J.1. In Suit No. 108 of 1967 the learned Sub-Judge, Ist Class, Mahendergarh, granted a pre-emption decree in respect of a parcel of agricultural land in favour of one Shanti Devi and against the...
Owners Alleging Violation of the Provisions of the Punjab Municipal Vs ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
P-20 and P-21 respectively].whereby she has been directed to demolish a part of the shop constructed by her allegedly in violation of the provisions of the Punjab Regional and Town Planning & Development Act, 1995 [for short
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Allegations on the Face of It Relate to Exchange of Vs. State of Harya ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-23-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-2495 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.1.2014. Mojinder Singh --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana --Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA. Present:- Mr.J.S.Hooda, Advocate...
“1. the Allegation Is That the Petitioner Was Found in Possession of ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-07-2014
possession of 5 injections of Norgesic.2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was allegedly found in possession of non-commercial quantity of this narcotic drug.3. Per contra, learned AAG, Punjab would submit that
“brief Allegations Against Petitioners-accused Are That on 15.5.2013 ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
CRM No.M-12520 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-12520 of 2014 Date of Decision: 21.4.2014 Antarpreet Singh & Ors...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHINDER...
“The Allegation Is That the Petitioners Who Are Vs. State of Haryana ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-13-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-10644 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.05.2014. Gurdev Singh & another --Petitioners Versus State of Haryana --Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA. Present:-...
“The Allegation Is That the Petitioner Along with Vs. State of Punja ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-20-2014
CRM-M No.9675 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.9675 of 2014. Date of Decision : 20.05.2014. Surjit Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE TEJINDER...
Suresh Bhatia Alleged President M.D.U. Employees Corporation Urban (S. ...
Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on: May-15-2012
JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBER Present revision petition has been filed under Section 21(b) and Section 27-A of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short as Act) challenging order dated 17.11.2011, passed by Haryana State Consumer...
Suresh Bhatia Alleged President/Secretary/Member Committee M.D.U. Empl ...
Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on: May-15-2012
JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBER Present revision petition has been filed under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short as Act) against order dated 22.12.2011, passed by Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission,...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free