All Sorts - Judgment Search Results
The Sort Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Dec-23-2009
Reported in: [2010]20STJ83(NULL)
K.A. Puj, J.1. Rule. Mr. Y.V. Ravani, learned Standing Counsel appearing for revenue waives service of rule. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying for...
Smt. Kalpana Sorte Vs. Union of India
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-06-2013
Writ Petition No.4517/2013 6.5.2013 Shri Sanjay Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is directed against the order dated 17.8.2012, Annexure P1, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur, whereby...
Ku. Shalini Gajananrao Dalal, Now Sou. Shalini Onkar Sorte Vs. New Eng ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-11-2009
Reported in: 2010(1)BomCR307; 2010(112)BomLR26
Vasanti A Naik, J.1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Both the petitions are heard finally with the consent of the parties. Since the issues involved in both these petitions, are almost identical, they are being heard...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
S.Md.HussaIn Vs. the Sr.Superintendent of Rms, Hyderabad Sorting Divis ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-02-2009
ORAL ORDER : (As per Hon'ble Mr.Justice.P.Lakshmana Reddy, Vice Chairman) Heard the learned Counsel Mr.S.Ramakrishna Rao for the Applicant and the learned Sr. Central Govt. Standing Counsel Mr.G.Jayaprakash Babu for the Respondents. 2. The applicant challenged...
J. Yesodha HSG I, Head Sorting Assistant HRO, Trivandrum RMS 'TV' Divi ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Nov-25-2009
HON'BLE Dr. K.B.S. RAJAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER When the case came for admission, counsel for applicant stated that the respondents are taking action for grant of increments for the period from 2007 onwards and thus her grievance...
The Senior Superintendent and Others Vs. K. Sasidharan Nair, Sorting A ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Jul-09-2010
HON'BLE MR. K. GEORGE JOSEPH, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER 1. Under C.A.T. Procedure Rule 17, no application for review shall be entertained unless it is filed within 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free