Alexander V Hawk - Judgment Search Results
Woodford Vs. Ngo
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-22-2006
1996 in the wake of a sharp rise in prisoner litigation in the federal courts, see, e.g. , Alexander v. Hawk , 159 F. 3d 1321, 1324-1325 (CA11 1998) (citing statistics). The PLRA contains a variety of provisions designed
Booth Vs. Churner
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-29-2001
exception in the statute, 206 F. 3d, at 299-300; accord, Freeman v. Francis, 196 F.3d 641 (CA6 1999); Alexander v. Hawk, 159 F.3d 1321 (CAll 1998). We granted certiorari to address this conflict among the Circuits, 531 U. S.
Davis' Administrator Vs. Weibbold
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-06-1891
date of the issuance of said patent." In Cleghorn v. Bird, 4 L.D. 478, and in Commissioners v. Alexander, 5 L.D. 126, Mr. Secretary Lamar followed the decision of Secretary Teller in Dughi v. Harkins, and in … this omission, and permit the party who defends the ruling below to supply the defect. In Deffeback v. Hawke, which was before us at October term, 1885, 115 U. S. 392 , we examined at some length
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Lewis Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-05-1892
exception taken at the time by the prisoner, and in this respect it differs from the case of Alexander v. United States, 138 U. S. 353 , where the same error was assigned, and was not considered by … Wheat. 480, 25 U. S. 482 . See also Co.Lit. 156b; Termes de la Ley, voc. Challenge, 2 Hawk, c. 43, § 4; Regina v. Frost, 9 Car. & P. 129, 137; Hartzell v. Commonwealth, 40 Penn.St.
Van BrocklIn Vs. Tennessee
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-01-1886
Erie County Commissioners, 16 Pet. 435, 41 U. S. 448 . The principal reason assigned in Buchanan v. Alexander, 4 How. 20, for holding that money in the hands of a purser, due to seamen in the … have become private property. Carroll v. Safford, 3 How. 441; Witherspoon v. Duncan, 4 Wall. 210; Deffeback v. Hawke, 115 U. S. 392 , 115 U. S. 405 . Even in the courts of the several states,
Colorado Coal and Iron Co. Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-21-1887
Stanton, register of the land office, Charles A. Cook, receiver for the land district at Pueblo, in Colorado, Alexander C. Hunt, and others unknown, who, it is alleged, organized and had incorporated the Southern Colorado Coal and … Colorado Coal & Iron Co. v. United States - 123 U.S. 307 (1887) U.S. Supreme Court Colorado Coal & Iron Co. v. United States, … or was capable of being worked. In the case of Deffeback v. Hawke, 115 U. S. 392 , the legislation on the subject was reviewed
Sunal Vs. Large
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-23-1947
habeas corpus may not now be used as a substitute. Accordingly, Sunal v. Large will be affirmed and Alexander v. Kulick will be reversed. So ordered. MR. JUSTICE BURTON concurs in the result. * Together with No. 840, … U. S. 104 -105; United States ex rel. Kennedy v. Tyler, 269 U. S. 13 ; Ex parte Hawk, 321 U. S. 114 , 321 U. S. 116 -117. So far as convictions obtained in the federal
Baker Vs. Carr
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-26-1962
public law enacted by the 1959 General Assembly of Tennessee creating said office." "Defendants, Dr. Sam Coward, James Alexander, and Hubert Brooks are the duly appointed and qualified members constituting the State Board of Elections, and as … Baker v. Carr - 369 U.S. 186 (1962) U.S. Supreme Court Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962) Baker v. … populous county"); Matthews v. Handley, supra, ("citizen of the State"); see also Hawke v. Smith (No. 1), 253 U. S. 221 ; Leser v. Garnett,
Grutter Vs. Bollinger
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-23-2003
Garibaldi, and Keith A. Noreika; for the Pacific Legal Foundation by John H. Findley; for Law Professor Larry Alexander et al. by Erik S. Jaffe; and for the Reason Foundation by Martin S. Kaufman. Briefs of amici … Grutter v. Bollinger - 539 U.S. 306 (2003) OCTOBER TERM, 2002 Syllabus GRUTTER v. BOLLINGER ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE … low grade men are New York City Jews.''' Letter from Herbert E. Hawkes, dean of Columbia College, to E. B. Wilson, June 16, 1922 (reprinted
Good Vs. Martin
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1877
a certain promissory note executed there June 29, 1866, and payable sixty days thereafter to the order of Alexander Davidson, by whom it was, before maturity, endorsed to the plaintiff. The note was signed by the first … Good v. Martin - 95 U.S. 90 (1877) U.S. Supreme Court Good v. Martin, 95 U.S. 90 (1877) Good v. … done in compliance with an agreement made before the note was executed. Hawkes v. Phillips, 7 Gray (Mass.) 284; Leonard v. Wilder, 36 Me. 265;
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free