Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Court: mumbai Page 88 of about 6,717 results (0.227 seconds)

Transport Corporation of India Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corporat ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1999)IIILLJ194Bom

..... )iillj396ap the learned counsel for the respondents submitted that since the control and management of the bombay region office was with the registered office at secunderabad and since the act was applicable in the state of andhra pradesh, the respondents were fully justified in calling upon the petitioners to make contribution in respect of other employees working in bombay ..... the parties and at the outset, i must state that both the counsel for the petitioners as wel i as for the respondents have argued so forcefully and persuasively that it is not easy to take a decision. however, the job of the court is to interpret the provisions of the ..... at items 1 and 2 of the said notification need not be looked into. item no. 3 of the said notification enumerates certain establishments to which the provisions of the act have been made applicable, these establishments are (i) hotels, (ii) restaurants, (iii) shops, (iv) cinema including preview theatres and (v) news paper establishments. it would be .....

Ashok Gangadhar Shedge and Others Vs. Ramesh Gangadhar Shedge, Since D ...

Court : Mumbai

..... daughter would become a coparcener which she was not until then. if she was to be taken to be the coparcener since even prior to the coming into force of the act, the word become? in clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 6 would have been instead 'was'. 35. in paragraph 19, it ..... the division bench considered the following acts:- (i) the juvenile justice (care and protection of children ) act, 2000 and amendment of 2006 to that act; (ii) benami transactions (prohibition) act, 1988; (iii) the orissa tenants protection act, 1948; (iv) the west bengal rent control (amendment) act, 1950; (v) the securities and exchange board of india act, 1992 (vi) the maharashtra ownership ..... only mean marginal note. the apex court in the cases of (i) commissioner of income tax vs. ahmedbhai umarbhai and co (air 1950 sc 134), (ii) board of muslim of wakfs rajasthan vs. radhakishan and others (air 1979 sc 289) (iii) dilawarbalu khurana vs. state of maharashtra (2002) 2 scc 135), and (iv) union of india vs .....

Jagjiwanrao Dayabhai and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1952CriLJ646

..... made and the revelations which were made as a result of such enquiry were startling.39. the impugned sholapur act applied directly and of its own force to a particular mill company. there were special circumstances in chiranjitlal's case : [1950]1scr869 which are not found in the present case. the only circumstance here is that the number of accused ..... 2) must be struck off as being repugnant to article 14.ansari, j. was of the same opinion. there are similar observations in abdul khader v. state of mysore air 1951 mys 72. (18) the impugned section 14, empowers the state government to deprive an accused of his right to be tried by a jury by directing his trial ..... similar provision in section 4(2) of the hyderabad's special tribunals regulation, was considered and declared invalid by a full bench in abdur rahim v. joseph a. pinto air 1951 hyd 11. naik, c.j. stated:the portions which offend the constitution are the whole of sub-section (2) of section 4, which permits only memoranda of .....

Maharashtra Chamber of Housing Industry and Others Vs. State of Mahara ...

Court : Mumbai

..... of india v. madan gopal kabra, (1954) 24 itr 58 = (air 1954 sc 158) while interpreting section 13 of the finance act, 1950, already extracted above, this court observed at p. 68 (of itr) = (at p. 162 of air) : "nor can section 6 of the general clauses act 1897, serve to keep alive the liability to pay tax on the income ..... 36), returns and reports, offences and penalties, etc. section 42 in this chapter provides for the overriding effect of the provisions of the principal act. 17. after the principal act came into force in the state of maharashtra, statements under section 6 thereof were filed by landholders. in some cases the land acquisition was completed and excess vacant ..... 9. the grievance is that though the order of exemption was passed exempting the excess vacant land from the purview of chapter-iii of the principal act, when that act was in force, but now after it's repeal the exemption order would not survive. in other words, the steps taken by the authorities to give effect to the .....

Anil (Vidyarthi) and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra Represented by t ...

Court : Mumbai

..... from service, or (g) has experience of not less than five years as an office bearer of a non-government organization registered under the bombay public trusts act, 1950 engaged in social welfare activities, working within the area of a municipal corporation or a council. 5. nomination of councillors. - in nominating the councillors, the collector ..... a self governing unit. in a developing country like ours, where the population is growing fast, where the society is in ferment on all fronts, where divisive forces of all kinds abound, where the vast majority of population is illiterate and is the victim of ignorance, superstition, blind-faith, biases and prejudices, and is ..... role thereof, two decisions of the hon'ble supreme court are extremely relevant. in the case of cantonment board, secunderabad vs. g. venketram reddy and ors. reported in air 1995 sc 1210, the hon'ble supreme court has held as under:- 3. .. how the expression, 'municipality' in the state' should be understood? the word ' .....

State of Maharashtra Vs. Kusum Charudutt Bharma Upadhye

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1981)83BOMLR75; 1981MhLJ93

..... exclusively assigned to the central legislature and others to the provincial legislature. in yet another field the two legislatures had concurrent legislative powers. the 1935 act came into force with regard to the provinces in april 1937. the federal structure at the centre, however, never came into existence, and the central government continued ..... to in the constitution as the commencement of the constitution. the constitution repealed both the government of india act, 1935, and the indian independence act, 1947. 46. before referring ..... india. under act. 394 of the constitution the said article 394 and articles 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 60, 324, 366, 367, 379, 380, 388, 391, 392, and 393 came into force at once and the remaining provisions came into force on january 26, 1950. this date, namely, 'the 26th day of january 1950' is referred .....

Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt. Ltd. Vs. V. Hotels Limited and Others

Court : Mumbai

..... to make further deposit or to comply with the directions of this court if necessity arises in this behalf. iv) bank of india ltd. vs. jamsetji ah chinoy [air 1950 pc 90 at paragraph 21 which reads thus :- 21 (4) was the first plaintiff entitled to relief by way of specific performance as ordered by the appellate court? ..... or, where there is an instrument of transfer, that the transfer has not been completed in the manner prescribed therefore by the law for the time being in force, the transferor or any person claiming under him is debarred from enforcing against the" transferee any right in respect of the property of which the transferee has taken ..... their part of contract and even assuming that the defendant was not entirely vigilant in protecting their rights in the proceedings before the competent authority under the 1976 act, the same by itself would not mean that a decree for specific performance of contract would automatically be granted. while considering the question as to whether the .....

Mina Srinivasan Krishnan and Another Vs. Arun Bhaskar Adarkar

Court : Mumbai

..... rent control laws in operation in the state; (c) clause 2(2) ensures that the existing protection to the tenants in the areas where the three rent acts are in force remains unaltered; (d) rents have remained frozen at prewar levels. a certain degree of relief in increase in rent was provided to the landlords in the ..... of special jurisdiction as referred in section 28 was frequently considered. in that regard, reliance placed by mr. devitre on the judgments of the learned single judge reported in air 1967 (bombay) 434 (vishnu dutt vashisth v/s maharashtra watch and gramophone company and firm at bombay and others) and 2005 (3) bombay cases reporter 579 ( ..... then has referred to several decisions including a full bench judgment of this court in the case of dattatraya krishna jangam v/s jairam ganesh gore reported in air 1965 bombay 177. the honourable supreme court held that before getting injunction, whether temporary or permanent, the plaintiff has to establish a legal right for the said .....

J.V. Gokal Charity Trust and Others Vs. Contrex Pvt. Ltd. and Others

Court : Mumbai

..... , whether the jurisdiction of a civil court is ousted in claim such as this because of the statutory provisions of the maharashtra public trusts act, 1950 ( mpta ) (earlier the bombay public trusts act, 1950 (act 29 of 1950). the act s title was changed by mah. 29 of 2012, schedule, entry 43, retrospectively with effect from 1st may 1960).mr. seervai and ..... court is not readily assumed or lightly inferred. ouster of jurisdiction has to be either explicit or necessarily implied. in dhulabhai vs. state of madhya pradesh : air 1969 sc 78 which is the locus classicus on the subject, the supreme court has held that where the statute gives a finality to the orders of special ..... application shall (a) in the case of a public trust created before this act was applied to it, be made, within three months from the date of the application of this act, and (b) in the case of a public trust created after this act comes into force, within three months of its creation. (5) such application shall inter alia .....

M/s. Ghodawat Energy Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Through t ...

Court : Mumbai

..... by article 286 of the constitution. notably, pan masala containing tobacco was not even included in the schedule to the ade act at the time section 7 of the ade act was in force. (g) section 14 of the central sales tax act, 1956 declares certain goods to be of special importance in inter-state trade or commerce. section 14(ix) of the ..... on article 261(1) of the constitution is also misplaced. as held by the full bench of the punjab high court in firm gauri lal gurdev das v. jugal kishore air 1959 pun. 265 at para 17 : article 261(1) merely establishes a rule of evidence and does not deal with jurisdiction . (n) pan masala, on the face of it ..... under the schedule to the ade act, 1957, were continued to be exempted by entry a-45. it would demonstrate that exclusion of only pan masala containing tobacco from entry no.a-45 is contrary to the object underlying this entry. the predecessor entry a-15 has been in existence and effective since 1950. the classification introduced by notification dated .....