Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Court: mumbai Page 100 of about 6,717 results (0.148 seconds)

Dec 23 1983 (HC)

Ramesh Bhauraoji and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : II(1984)ACC40

..... government in the purported exercise of power under sub-section (2) of section 8 of the road transport corporations act, 1950 and rule 4a of the bombay state road transport corporation rules (hereinafter referred to as 'the act' and 'the rules' respectively) terminating their appointment as directors of the board of directors of the maharashtra ..... the director' occurring in section 8 (2) does not exclude from its fold such persons who actually held office on the date when the amendment act came into force. according to the state government, the impugned notices are prospective in operation inasmuch as they terminate the appointment of the petitioners prospectively.12. since neither ..... ) of section 8 read with rule 4a for terminating the appointment of a member who is appointed as such prior to the coming into force of the amendment act mr. manohar for the petitioners contends that these provisions are not retrospective and cannot operate on the appointment of a person who has been nominated .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 01 1987 (HC)

Gunvantlal Kantilal Khamar Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1988)90BOMLR9; 1988MhLJ194

..... assistant head master (ahm) after quashing the appointment of respondent 7 to that post.2. respondent 4 is a trust/society registered under the bombay public trust act, 1950, and the societies registration act, 1860. the governing body of the said respondents, hereinafter referred to as 'the society' has for its officebearers a secretary who is the father-in- ..... are notified by the management to the deputy director for this purpose.the words 'conditions of service and conduct and discipline' were deleted vide maharashtra act xxx of 1986 and the deletion came into force as with effect from august 7, 1987. the material portions of rules 3, 5 and 15 are to the following effect:5(1). ..... , led to the filing of the writ petition by the management. the effect of the decisions of the supreme court in kerala education bill air[1958] s.c. 956, and sidhrajbhai v. state of gujarat air[1963] s.c. 540, was summarised by the full bench in the form of four propositions:(i) a school established by a minority .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 2009 (HC)

In Re: Sequent Scientific Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [2009]94SCL55(Bom)

..... of the court is superadded as in the case of ordinary compromise decrees. the actual transfer is brought by the further order, operating with the force conferred on it by sub-section (2) of section 153a, companies act. in other words, it is a transfer otherwise than by assignment. (p. 133)14. it necessarily follows that the issue raised by the ..... be useful to advert to the decision of the full bench of the madras high court in the case of sahayanidhi virudhunagar ltd. v. a.s.r. subrahmanya nadar air 1951 mad. 209. in paragraph 4, the court dealing with the effect of order of court sanctioning the arrangement observed thus:4. before considering the terms and stipulations in ..... upon the transferee-company.... (p. 210)21. similarly, the apex court in the case of j.k. (bombay) (p.) ltd. v. new kaiser-i-hindspg. & wvg. co. ltd. : air 1970 sc 1041 in paragraph 29 has observed that a scheme sanctioned by the court does not operate as a mere agreement between the parties; it becomes binding on the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2001 (HC)

All India Federation of Tax Practitioners Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [2001]116TAXMAN418(Bom)

..... particular persons or classes.39. in jaipur hosiery mills (p) ltd. v. state of rajasthan : [1997]1scr396 , a notification under the rajasthan sales tax act, 1950 exempting from tax the sale of garments which did not exceed rs. 4 per piece was assailed. the supreme court found the classification permissible. it was held:'it ..... legislature and to define, in any particular case before them, the limits of respective powers. the judicial committee in prafulla kumar mukherjee v. bank of commerce air 1947 fc 60 referred with approval following observations of gwyer, c.j., in subrahmanyan chettiars case (supra),'it must inevitably happen from time-to-time that ..... india, petitioners who are associations of tax practitioners, chartered accountants and architects challenge the constitutional validity of section 116 of the finance (no. 2) act, 1998. the act envisages service tax at the rate of 5 per cent of the value of taxable service provided to any person by the person responsible for collecting .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 2012 (HC)

Susme Builders Private Limited Vs. Chief Executive Officer Slum Rehabi ...

Court : Mumbai

..... on reading of the judgment in the light of question before court." the apex court further held that the ratio of decision, and not any finding of facts, has binding force. there is no dispute about the above proposition. we also agree with the ratio of decision in the secretary sh.a.p.d.jain pathshala's case (supra). the ..... the society that the resolution to be passed on 1 november 2009 for ratification of the appointment of new developer will not be given effect to. this statement is in force till today and the arbitration proceedings are now converted into a civil suit. 10. pursuant to the show cause notice, hearing was given by ceo shri s.s.zende ..... litigants who approach the -tribunal for justice, if the reasonable restriction introduced in section 129(6) of the customs act is not enforced. reference can be made to the judgments of this court in the case of manaklal v. dr. prem chand [air 1957 sc 425] and rasmiranjandas v. sarojkanta behera [(2000) 10 scc 502]. 54. this court in the case .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 2012 (HC)

Jer Rutton Kavasmaneck @ Jer Jawahar Thadani and Another Vs. Gharda Ch ...

Court : Mumbai

..... the petitioners in cp 77 and the respondents and as such it is a judgement by concession by parties. relying upon the judgment of supreme court reported in air 2001 sc 1273 it is submitted that the judgment obtained by concession is not a binding precedent. in the alternative it is submitted that it is a consensual ..... essential element which must be satisfied before the decision can be brought into force. thus considered the making of the award cannot consist merely in the physical act of writing the award or signing it or even filing it in the office of the collector; it must involve the communication ..... functus officio...... 58. the learned senior counsel also placed reliance upon the judgment of the supreme court in the case of harish chandra raj singh vs. land acquisition, air 1961 s.c. 1500 and more particularly para 6 which reads thus : the knowledge of the party affected by such a decision, either actual or constructive, is an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 06 2013 (HC)

Snehalaya’s Snehankur Adoption Centre, Through Its Authorized Sig ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... at the earliest. 5 petitioner in both these petitions is adoption agency working under snehalaya, a public charity trust registered under the provisions of bombay public trusts act, 1950. snehalaya, according to the petitioner, runs 16 projects for unprivileged women and children. it is stated that since 2005, hundreds of children have been rescued, ..... not deserve consideration. 22 a reference to the judgment delivered by the supreme court in the matter of laxmi kant pandey vs. union of india, reported in air 1986 sc 272, would be appropriate. in paragraph no.6 of the judgment, the supreme court has observed thus: .... it should also be impressed upon ..... object pronounced by the government of india while declaring national charter for children, 2003, and the provisions contained in juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000 and the maharashtra juvenile justice (care and protection of children) rules, framed by the state of maharashtra. are not in its letter and spirit adhered .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 2014 (HC)

Dnyanshwar Vs. State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary and Another

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... competent authority was justified in imposing the punishment of dismissal on the petitioner. the only reason given is that the petitioner being a member of a disciplined force was not expected to act in this manner. insofar as the second ground about the non-communication of the incident is concerned, we have already found that it cannot be made ..... of that particular government service the court will also strike down the impugned order. thus, in shankar dass v. union of india (1985) 2 scc 358 : (air 1985 sc 772) this court set aside the impugned order of penalty on the ground that the penalty of dismissal from service imposed upon the appellant was whimsical and ordered ..... have to peruse the judgment of the criminal court and consider all the facts and circumstances of the case and the various factors set out in challappan's case (air 1975 sc 2216). this, however, has to be done by it ex parte and by itself. once the disciplinary authority reaches the conclusion that the government servant' .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 2016 (HC)

M/s. Nagpur Distillers Private Limited and Another Vs. The State of Ma ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... by this court. the respondents in the state appeals can raise this question if so advised when the notification is issued under section 1(3) of the act bringing chapter iv into force. however, the appellant chander shekhar singh was a party to the decision in state of orissa v. chander sekhar, and that judgment is binding on him. ..... clauses in writ petition, he states that the controversy is already decided against the petitioners by the division bench of this court vide its judgment reported at 2014 [16] air bombay reports 324 (municipal labour union anant bhuvan .vrs. state of maharashtra and others). he adds that as law made by the state government is valid, reasons ..... will be more than the cost thereof for exempted dealers. the amending rules of 2015, are therefore, bad in law and unsustainable. he relies upon a judgment reported at air 1952 sc 75 (the state of west bengal .vrs. anwar ali sarkar and another). 10. our attention is invited to reply affidavit placed on record by the state .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 16 1957 (HC)

Popatlal Ratansey Vs. Kalidas Bhavan

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1958Bom1; (1957)59BOMLR860; ILR1957Bom688

..... for fixation of standard rent, fixed a sum of rs. 40 per month as being the standard rent for the shops. the landlord's suit no. 70 of 1950 was decreed by the court and under the decree the tenant was called upon to deliver possession of the shops to the landlord. against the above mentioned decisions both the ..... between landlord and tenant was settled by agreement between the parties, the settlement could not form the basis of a decree. mr. jethmalani contends that the provisions of the act saying that disputes as to standard rent should be decided by the court or the controller are exceptional provisions and that, therefore, the ordinary provisions of jaw regarding a ..... previous proceeding between himself and the landlord, he has contended, in the words of a decision of this court in chapsi umersi v. keshavji damji 23 bom lr 133: air 1921 bom 224, that 'the standard rent is to be fixed in relation to premises and not in relation to persons and can, therefore, be only one and not .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //