Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Court: mumbai Page 1 of about 6,717 results (0.106 seconds)

Dec 16 2009 (HC)

Central Warehousing Corporation (a Govt. of India Undertaking) Vs. For ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2010(1)MhLj658

..... . in paragraph 38, the division bench has went on to observe that the deletion of the expression or any other law for the time being in force in sub-section (1) by maharashtra act 24 of 1984 has brought about a sea change and makes a world of difference. we are afraid, this is a very wide statement made without ..... court in girish . v. ram lal and ors. reported in : 2005 (2) scc 638 to buttress this proposition. it is also argued that the act of 1996 is a special statute which has come into force subsequently. therefore, the legislature is deemed to be aware of the earlier non-obstante clause for which reason also the later non-obstante clause ought ..... dr. s. shankar and anr. reported in : air 1981 bom. 339. it is argued that when section 41 of act of 1882 was introduced in 1976 and amended in 1984, at the relevant time, the act of 1996 had not come into force but the law was governed by the provisions of arbitration act, 1940. insofar as arbitration act, 1940 is concerned, it does not contain .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 2014 (HC)

Mina Srinivasan Krishnan and Another Vs. Arun Bhaskar Adarkar

Court : Mumbai

..... rent control laws in operation in the state; (c) clause 2(2) ensures that the existing protection to the tenants in the areas where the three rent acts are in force remains unaltered; (d) rents have remained frozen at prewar levels. a certain degree of relief in increase in rent was provided to the landlords in the ..... of special jurisdiction as referred in section 28 was frequently considered. in that regard, reliance placed by mr. devitre on the judgments of the learned single judge reported in air 1967 (bombay) 434 (vishnu dutt vashisth v/s maharashtra watch and gramophone company and firm at bombay and others) and 2005 (3) bombay cases reporter 579 ( ..... then has referred to several decisions including a full bench judgment of this court in the case of dattatraya krishna jangam v/s jairam ganesh gore reported in air 1965 bombay 177. the honourable supreme court held that before getting injunction, whether temporary or permanent, the plaintiff has to establish a legal right for the said .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 1996 (HC)

Sudha Sakharam Govandalkar and ors. Vs. Shrikrishna Pandurang Kode D/H ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1997(1)BomCR83; (1996)98BOMLR154

..... not applicable to applications and other proceedings filed in the small cause court under the substituted chapter and pending in that court on the date of coming into force of the maharashtra act xix of 1976 i.e. on 1st july, 1976. all such applications and other proceedings are to be continued and disposed of by the small cause ..... the small cause court under this chapter and pending in the high court or the bombay city civil court, on the date of coming into force of the presidency small cause courts (maharashtra amendment) act, 1975, shall be continued and disposed of by the high court or the city civil court, as the case may be, as if this ..... application was filed in the small cause court in the year 1974 and said application was pending in that court on the date of coming into force of the presidency small cause courts (maharashtra amendment) act 1975 (maharashtra act xix of 1976). the uncontroverted legal position is that prior to the amendment of the presidency small cause courts .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 1996 (HC)

Sudha Sakharam Govandalkar and ors. Vs. Shrikrishna Pandurang Kode and ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1996(4)BomCR380

..... not applicable to applications and other proceedings filed in the small cause court under the substituted chapter and pending in that court on the date of coming into force of the maharashtra act xix of 1976 i.e. on 1st july, 1976. all such applications and other proceedings are to be continued and disposed of by the small cause ..... the small cause court under this chapter and pending in the high court or the bombay city civil court, on the date of coming into force of the presidency small cause court (maharashtra amendment) act, 1975, shall be continued and disposed of by the high court or the city civil court, as the case may be, as if this ..... application was filed in the small cause court in the year 1974 and said application was pending in the court on the date of coming into force of the presidency small cause courts (maharashtra amendment) act, 1975 (maharashtra act, xix of 1976). the uncontroverted legal position is that prior to the amendment of the presidency small cause courts .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 24 2016 (HC)

Sonali Bodraj Moon and Others Vs. The Chief Secretary and Others

Court : Mumbai

..... or post, no court except (a) the supreme court; or (b) any industrial tribunal, labour court or other authority constituted under the industrial disputes act, 1947 or any other corresponding law for the time being in force, shall have, or be entitled to exercise any jurisdiction, powers or authority in relation to such recruitment or matters concerning such recruitment or such service ..... an effective substitute and, to that end, suggested several amendments to the provisions governing the form and content of the tribunal. the suggested amendments were given the force of law by an amending act (act 51 of 1987) after the conclusion of the case and the act has since remained unaltered. 10. we may now analyse the scheme and the salient features of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 1957 (HC)

Major E.G. Barsay and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1958CriLJ1144

..... the code of criminal procedure. that section empowers the central government to make rules consistent with the code and the army act and the other act mentioned therein, providing for the trial of persons subject to military, naval or air force law by a court to which the code of criminal procedure applies or by a court martial; and it also provides ..... order to examine these submissions, it would be necessary to deal in some detail with the provisions of the army act, 1950, and the rules made thereunder. section 2 (1) of the act gives a list of persons who are subject to the act, under section 3 (ii) 'civil offence' is defined as 'an offence which is triable by a criminal ..... that there are some irregularities and errors in the charge.13. the second point as regards the legality of the trial is raised under the provisions of the army act, 1950, by mr. purshottam on behalf of accused no. 1. that again is a point which has been raised for the first time in appeal challenging the jurisdiction of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 1967 (HC)

Bibi Batool and ors. Vs. the Principal Judge, City Civil Court, Bombay ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1972Bom254; (1972)74BOMLR22

..... a quasi - judicial enquiry. the absence of a right to cross - examine is here considered in connection with the enquiry of the advisory boars under the preventive detention act, 1950. the enquiry by an advisory board, is not a quasi - judicial enquiry, but the function of the advisory board is limited to consider the relevant material placed before ..... all other tenants in bombay. that challenge was repelled by the supreme court in that judgment in the ground that the two classes of tenants were not by force of circumstances placed on equal footing and the tenants of government or local authority would not therefore complain of any denial of equality before the law or equal ..... open to us to take this factor into account when considering discrimination by such sub - classification. he stated that it has been held in somwanti's case air 1963 sc 51, that the binding effect of a decision does not depend upon whether a particular argument was considered therein or not, provided that the point with .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 22 2016 (HC)

State Bank of India and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra, through the S ...

Court : Mumbai

..... the appropriate stamp duty payable on any instrument executed on a particular date in the past, which could be as early as the year 1959 when the stamp act came into force. further, the petitioners state that is ex facie unreasonable, irrational and arbitrary for respondent nos.1, 2 and 3 to require all banks and financial institutions ..... penal measure even in civil proceedings. 38. further elaborating this concept in a latter decision in the case of pratibha processors and ors. vs. union of india and ors., air 1997 sc 138, the hon'ble supreme court explains it thus : fiscal statutes with import of the words tax , interest , penalty etc. are well known. they are ..... failure means 'a falling short', 'deficiency' or 'lack'. it has also referred to a judgment of allahabad high court in the case of ram kishore vs. bimla devi, air 1957, all. 658. 94. even in common parlance and going by the dictionary meaning it means the omission of expected or required action. therefore, if that cannot be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 16 2016 (HC)

Johnson Matthey Chemicals India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai

..... any other similar international body, entitled to privileges under any convention or agreement to which india is a party or under any law for the time being in force, if such official, personnel, consular or diplomatic agent, as the case may be, has purchased such goods for himself or for the purposes of such mission ..... another in dealing with third persons. the person for whom such work is done or who is so represented is called the principal . (2) normally, persons acting as brokers, factors, auctioneers, commission agents, del credere agents etc. are the agents contemplated under this section. it may be added that the contract of agency ..... the assistance of additional materials. 14. in support of the contentions, mr. sridharan places reliance on the following decisions:- (i) sales tax officer, pilibhit vs. budh prakash jai prakash, air 1954 sc 459. (ii) balabhagas hulaschand vs. state of orissa, (1976) 2 scc 44. (iii) consolidated coffee ltd. and anr. vs. coffee board, bangalore, (1980) .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 2016 (HC)

Creative Tours and Travels (India) Private Limited Vs. Intellectual Pr ...

Court : Mumbai

..... claims that they have all the licenses and authorizations and, equally, they are claiming accreditations from the international air transport association (iata). they are also claiming that they had a sub-registration under the bombay shops and establishments act, 1948. the predecessor and, equally, the successor-company, the petitioner before us, have been filing their ..... u). 22. the term "registered trade mark", as defined in section 2(w), means a trade mark, which is actually on the register and remaining in force. the term "registrar", as defined in section 2(y), to mean the registrar of trade marks referred to in section 3 and definition of the term " ..... travel private limited" at new delhi is a company established in the year 1977 as a private limited company. it is duly registered under the indian companies act, 1956. the company was established amongst others with an object to deal in destination management, corporate package, conferences and meetings. during the period of three .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //