Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Court: mumbai Page 86 of about 6,717 results (0.132 seconds)

Bhairulal Balmukund Verma Vs. Poonamchand Kasturchand Sancheti and anr ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1996(2)BomCR267

..... kumdar, (cited supra) and the supreme court thus held -'5. under section 13(1)(e) of the rajasthan premises (control of rent and eviction) act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'), the tenant is liable to be evicted, if he has assigned, sub-let or otherwise parted with the possession of the whole or any part of ..... supra. the apex court in the said judgment thus held-'6. the question for consideration is whether the mischief contemplated under section 14(1)(b) of the act has been committed as the tenant had sublet, assigned or otherwise parted with the possession of the whole or part of the premises without obtaining the consent in ..... also examined one vijay pandurang nemade and bhagwan vishnu jadhav. on the other hand, the tenant examined himself and also produced the certificate of the shops and establishments act issued by the municipal council, malkapur.5. the rent controller after hearing the parties, granted permission to the landlord to determine the tenancy under clause 13(3)( .....

Raghunath Eknath Hivale Vs. Shardabai Karbhari Kale and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : I(1987)ACC253

..... of the section came into force on a subsequent date, they will not be applicable to the facts of the present case. hence the said observations have to be set aside.16. in the result ..... for the claimants in both the cases were also unable to enlighten us on the point. it appears that probably the tribunal had in mind the amendment to the act whereby chapter viia dealing with liability without fault in certain cases, was introduced. since the accident in the present case occurred on the 28th july 1982 and the provisions ..... kerala high court reported in 1971 acj 219 (kesavan nair v. state insurance officer) and by a decision of the division bench of the karnataka high court reported in air 1977 kar 46 (the madras motor and general insurance company limited and anr. v. nanjamma and ors.). more or less a similar view is taken by the andhra pradesh .....

Ghanshyam S/O Chandumal Harwani and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(5)ALLMR386; 2007(6)BomCR239; 2007(5)MhLj25

..... respondent no. 2 corporation filed submissions therein assuring that no action will be taken against petitioners without following the procedure prescribed under bombay provincial municipal corporation act, 1949. after recording said undertaking, that writ petition was dismissed on 14-6-2000. thereafter petitioners submitted representation to assistant director that they would ..... their application for grant of sanction to building plan. respondent no. 2 is a body corporate constituted under the provisions of bombay provincial municipal corporation act, 1949, and is local authority as also planning authority for development of amravati town. state of maharashtra is arrayed as respondent no. 1 while collector ..... been sanctioned on the expiry of thirty days by virtue of section 319 of the bengal municipal act for the reason that no such permission could have been actually granted under the law then in force in the said area, having regard to the width of the road abutting the respondents' plot .....

Godrej and Boyce Mfg. Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Municipal Commissioner

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1970)72BOMLR747

..... the; misunderstanding is based on not appreciating the technical meaning of the word 'digestion'. it is common knowledge that even where septic tanks are provided, polluted air and polluted water outlets have to be provided. if, according to the expert mr. patwardhan, 10 per cent, of the sludge remains undigested for a period ..... (eggs) can survive sewage treatment, and be included in this sludge. there, they will persist for long times and cannot be fully destroyed by digestion or air drying. although the numbers of surviving organisms decrease appreciably in the normal course of events., only heat-dried sludge can be considered fully safe.he, therefore, referred ..... materia with section 86 of the district municipal act, the learned chief judge erred in holding that the contentions regarding the validity of the halalkhor tax were barred and that he had no jurisdiction to consider the validity of the halalkhor tax. there is considerable force in this argument. the contentions raised by the .....

Karantikari Suraksha Rakshak Sanghatana Vs. State of Maharashtra and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR401; 2006(6)BomCR673

..... the learned judge also noted that the state of maharashtra had passed the maharashtra mathadi and hamal and other manual workers (regulation of employment and welfare) act, 1969. that act had come into force on 13th june 1969. a representation was made to the government by the trade union of the security guards to constitute a board on the lines ..... to the conclusion that the provision under section 3(4) was not called for at all. it is a sub-section which provides that once the act or a scheme comes into force, merely on that count no principal employer or agency will discharge the security guards. the learned judge felt that the provision was unnecessary and meaningless. 19 ..... pradesh reported in : air1959sc648 which is quoted in para-24 of t.k.v.t.s.s. medical educational & charitable trust v. state of t.n. reported in air 1966 sc 2384 as follows:24. in deep chand v. state of uttar pradesh : air1959sc648 , this court, while dealing with article 254 of the constitution, has held:repugnancy .....

Santramsing S/O Arjunsingh Rajput Vs. Shivlal Ramling Rajput and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(1)ALLMR371; 2006(2)BomCR834; 2005(4)MhLj987

..... discontinued cultivation of land which he has taken possession under an order passed by the tahsildar under section 44 of the act, that will not be treated as voluntary discontinuation of possession. the true affect of section 45 is to protect the interest of the ex tenant, whose tenancy is ..... therefore, it cannot be said that landlord has discontinued the possession on his own and inducted respondent no. 1 as 'bataidar'. the provisions of section 45 of the act are to be interpreted in the light of the facts which are brought on record. if in given set of facts, the landlord compelled to part with possession and ..... by both the authorities below were based on the evidence on record and therefore, the m.r.t. was hearing a revision application under section 91 of the act has no jurisdiction to reappreciate the evidence and record a contrary finding. she submitted that the question which was raised in the proceedings revolve around only on one .....

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Sheshrao and Another

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... of satish vishwanath palasdekar and ors. vs. state of maharashtra, reported in [1999 (1) mh.l.j.204 to submit that even if it was alleged that, force was used against the complainant, the acts would be protected. in that matter, in spite of offence under section 304-a of i.p.c., benefit of section 161(1) of police ..... without due care and caution. 16. in this regard one of the old judgments is in the matter of narayan hari tarkhande vs. yeshwant raoji naik etc., reported in air 1928 bombay 352. this judgment was by the full bench. facts of that matter show that, sub-inspector of police, while investigating a cognizable offence against two berads ..... date of the offence. (2) . . . . . . . . (emphasis supplied) 8. learned counsel for the respondents relied on the case of virupaxappa veerappa kadampur vs. state of mysore, reported in air 1963 sc 849, in which the hon'ble supreme court considered the above words under colour of duty . in para 10, it was observed as under : counsel 10. it appears .....

Smt. Zubedabegum Wd/O Abdul Hai and ors. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2004(4)ALLMR648; 2004(6)BomCR624; (2005)ILLJ435Bom; 2004(4)MhLj517

..... of that employee.5. we will consider in brief the contentions raised above in die light of scheme of 1995 itself the employees' pension scheme of 1995 came into force on 16.11.1995 and was effective from 1.4.1993. in para 1(3) it is clearly stated that the scheme shall apply to the employees of factories ..... a member of the employees' provident fund scheme, 1952 or of the provident funds of the factories and other establishments exempted by the appropriate government under section 17 of the act, or in whose case exemption has been granted under paragraph 27 or 27-a of the employees' provident fund scheme, 1952, from the dale of such membership;(b) who ..... d) who has been a member of the employees' provident fund or of provident funds of factories and other establishments exempted by the appropriate government under section 17 of the act or in whose case exemption has been granted under paragraph 27 or 27-a of the employees' provident fund scheme, 1952, on 15th november, 1995 but not being a .....

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Vinayak Shivajirao Pol and Others

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1998BomCR(Cri)109; 1998CriLJ306; I(1998)DMC322

..... he had gone to his sister's house at akurdi, pune. this explanation of respondent-accused vinayak was found not satisfactory and, therefore, he was punished under the army act by the authorities. the prosecution story proceeds further, that on 17-2-1983 in the morning, respondent-accused vinayak approached one mr. a.s. gill, the major, captain ..... . therefore, question raised before us is as to 'whether the statement of extra judicial confession (exhibit 73) is a valid document under section 24 of the evidence act and it could be used against the accused a maker of the document'? it is a settled law that the requirement of legal evidence must be complete before coming ..... legal position in the matter of a case like this, which rests on the sole prosecution evidence mainly based on extra judicial confession made under section 24 of the evidence act, has been considered by the apex court in various cases. 17. the supreme court in the case of state of u. p. v. deoman upadhyaya, reported in : .....

Laxmibai Sadashiv Date and ors. Vs. Ganesh Shankar Date and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1977Bom350; (1977)79BOMLR234

..... a regrant only to the senior-most member of the branch, who was in possession of the land and enjoyment of the income therefrom at the time when the act came into force. the submission of mr. paranjpe is that section 4 whereby alienations and rights and incidents in respect thereof are abolished starts with the non obstante clause to the ..... effect any other change in any other rights of the holders in such lands. at page 293 (of bom lr) : (at p. 325 of air) after summarising the provisions of the bombay inferior village watans abolition act, 1958 malvankar, j, points out;--'it seems to me, therefore, that what s- 4 sub-sections (1) and (2) seek to abolish and ..... that by the section the legislature intended to extinguish all rights and incidents in sanadi inam lands in suit with effect from feb. 1, 1959 od which date the act was brought into force in kolhapur state by a gazette notification, r. d. no. pka 1058-ix/ 205276-l, dated january 21, 1959, published in the government gazette, part iv- .....