Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Court: delhi Page 15 of about 5,616 results (0.168 seconds)

Union of India and ors. Vs. B.N. Jha

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 91(2001)DLT581; 2001(58)DRJ765

..... .sd/-(b.s. garcha)dig & commandant9. the learned counsel for the appellant-union of india urged that the appellant had acted in accordance with the provisions of the border security force act, 1968 and the border security force rules, 1969. the appellant also submitted that the respondent was given full opportunity to defend himself in this case including a ..... zila parishad zila parishad, muzaffarnagar : [1969]1scr518 their lordships relied on the constitution bench judgment of the supreme court in rashid ahmed vs municipal board, kairana : [1950]1scr566 , and their lordships observed as under:'the existence of an adequate legal remedy is a thing to be taken into consideration in the matter of granting writs' and ..... such as a writ of certiorari notwithstanding the fact that the statutory remedies have not been exhausted'.39. state of u.p. vs. mohammad nooh reported in air 1958 sc 86, s.r. das, c.j., speaking for the court, observed:'in the next place it must be borne in mind that there is no .....

Jc 722890x Subedar B.K. Singh Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... on the non-availability of a statutory appeal under the army act, 1950. the legislature has stepped in and provided for the lacunae by the enactment of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007.16. be that as it may, the petitioner did not challenge the provisions of the army act, 1950 when he filed the writ petition in 2002 on grounds of non ..... sixth charges for which he had been tried and imposed a sentence of dismissal from service. the petitioner's statutory appeal under section 164 (2) of the army act, 1950 assailing the said order was dismissed by chief of army staff by an order passed on 13th june, 2002 and the findings and sentence of court martial was also ..... prithi pal singh bedi & ors. v. union of india & ors.; air 1988 sc 1531 a.r. antulay v. r.s. nayak & anr. & (2007) 6 scc 528 dilip s. dahanukar v. kotak mahindra co. ltd. & anr.15. we find that challenge to the constitutionality of the army act, 1950 has been sustained by the apex court in the pronouncement entitled col. prithi .....

R.S. Bhagat Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1982Delhi191; ILR1980Delhi1422; 1981LabIC617; 1981(1)SLJ71(Delhi)

..... bangalore. at that time he was doing the defense management course at the institute of defense management. the training course was in the air force command. on 30th july. 1973 the petitioner shifted to command air force officers mess. he was to share the room there with complainant m.l. kapoor. mr. kapoor who had gone to bangalore from ..... to how the opinion of the defense minister, who is the highest authority has been disregarded and the petitioner had been dismissed. under section 144 of the army act 1950 the court martial can consider the 'general character' of the accused and 'other matters as may be prescribed.' of course the accused must be given an opportunity ..... allegations and averments offacts stood non-traversed and that the law would take its own course in the circumstances. (iii) under section 164(2) of the army act, 1950, the central government have a power to revise the order of the court martial and to pass such an order as they think fit. the central government can annul .....

Sh. Jaspal Singh Vs. Sh. O.P. Babbar

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 149(2008)DLT205; 2008(101)DRJ283

..... roll for the time being in force of a constituency shall be conclusive evidence of the fact that the person referred to in that entry is an elector for that constituency, unless it is proved that he is subject to a disqualification mentioned in section 16 of the representation of the people act, 1950 (43 of 1950).(8) immediately after all the ..... to supply an inadequacy, to effect a change of policy, to formulate a plan of government. that aim, that policy is not drawn, like nitrogen, out of the air; it is evidenced in the language of the statute, as read in the light of other external manifestations of purpose ('some reflections on the reading of statutes' 47 columbia lr ..... bank of travancore v. mohammed mohammed khan : [1982]1scr338 .iii surjit singh kalra v. union of india : [1991]1scr364 .iv directorate of enforcement v. deepak mahajan and anr. air 1999 sc 1775.v hameedia hardware stores v. b. mohan lal (1998) 2 scc 513.vi o.s. singh v. union of india : (1996)7scc37 .vii union of india v .....

Shri Santosh Kumar Sur Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... has been conferred upon the police authority under the code of criminal procedure.67. section 11 (1)(i) of the central industrial security force act, 1968 has conferred power on the members of the force to arrest any person who voluntarily cause hurt to, or attempts voluntarily to cause hurt to, or wrongfully restrains or attempts wrongfully to ..... does not affect the jurisdiction of the court to issue a writ; but, as observed by this court in rashid ahmed v. municipal board, kairana manu/sc/0005/1950 : [1950]1scr566 , 'the existence of an adequate legal remedy is a thing to be taken into consideration in the matter of granting writs'. vide also k. s. rashid ..... the future of the principle of 'proportionality' which is recognised in the administrative law of several of our fellow members of the european economic community..."109. in air 1983 sc 454 bhijat ram v. state of himachal pradesh, the court held that the penalty imposed must always be commensurate with the gravity of the misconduct and .....

Om Prakash Shrivastava @ Babloo Shrivastava Vs. State of Nct of Delhi ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 164(2009)DLT218

..... observed that it was impossible to say by reference to the provision that the pecuniary resources and property acquired before the date on which the prevention of corruption act came into force should not be taken into account even if in possession of the accused or any other person on his behalf. to accept such an interpretation would imply ..... does not arise. the apex court in electronics corporation of india ltd. and ors. v. secretary, revenue department, government of andhra pradesh and ors. reported in : air 1999 sc 1734 has held that 'the question of reading down comes in if it is found that these provisions are ultra vires as they stand. we have held that ..... organized crime. it was for this purpose that the special law was enacted. the said act was extended to the national capital territory of delhi by gsr 6 (e) in exercise of powers conferred by section 2 of the union territories (laws) act, 1950 by the central government with certain modifications. it is necessary to refer to some of .....

Col Gajraj Singh (Retd.) Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2000IVAD(Delhi)665; 2000(54)DRJ765

..... police authorities for a period of 2 years with the intention to drag the period beyond 3 years as per section 123 of army act 1950. it is stated that provisions of sections 123 of the army act were invoked against the petitioner vide asc centre north vide letter no.pc-1102/2/gs/conf dated 29.9.95. the petitioner ..... period of limitation is concerned, the view i have taken above make this argument of the respondents virtually irrelevant. however, on the facts of this case, i am forced to decide this aspect against the respondents. there is no quarrel with the proposition of law that as per the judgment cited by the respondents, it is established principle ..... not take place primarily due to the operation of the stay orders obtained from time to time by the petitioner. during the period when stay orders were not in force, t was the petitioner who intentionally avoided and did make himself unavailable before the authorities. due to the orders passed by the calcutta high court on the petitioner's .....

K. Suresh Vs. Lloyds Finance Ltd. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : III(2008)BC401

..... ias') was nominated by the state government of madhya pradesh to serve as the managing director of the mpsrtc. in terms of section 43 of the road transport corporation act, 1950 (`rtc act'), the petitioner was a public servant within the meaning of section 21 of the indian penal code (ipc). thereforee, prior sanction for prosecuting the petitioner in terms of ..... taken by the revision petitioners, and the purchase of vehicles in pursuance of this decision with financial aid from the complainant firm, are acts within the meaning of the provisions of section 26 of the act of 1950. the raising of the working capital from the complainant firm is well covered by the phrase 'in the open market' occurring in section ..... division bench had come to the following conclusions in para 10 of its judgment:10. section 26 of the act of 1950 empowers the corporation to borrow money from open market for raising its working capital or meeting any expenditure of capital nature. the background of the case amply .....

Jitendra Nath Banerjee and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2006(89)DRJ114

..... under section 20 of the cpc. this rationale commends itself even in the context of article 226 of the constitution.8. in sector twenty one owners welfare association v. air force naval housing board : 65 (1997) dlt 81 (db), a division bench of this court has held that a trivial or insignificant part of the cause of action arising ..... matter of registration of the sale deed-cum-sub-lease deed merely because a document can be registered at delhi by virtue of section 30(2) of the registration act, territorial jurisdiction in the courts at delhi cannot be inferred. moreover, the petitioner-association is already having some litigation before the courts of u.p. and at one ..... or his legal heirs notwithstanding the fact that the lease has already expired: provided further that where an area reserved under rule 58 or under section 17a of the act is proposed to be granted to a government company, no notification under clause (ii) shall be required to be issued:provided also that where an area held under .....

Universal Music India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [2008]87SCL51(Delhi)

..... singh, upon a consideration of the statutory scheme and legislative intent, the apex court held that the authority which disposed of a post-confirmation petition under the border security force act, 1968 and rules framed there under is not a court and every order passed administratively cannot be subjected to the rigors of principles of natural justice.62. in : ..... sangh and anr. v. state of bihar).42. while considering the question raised with regard to exercise of the power of the central government under section 19 of the army act, 1950 with rule 14 of the army rules, 1954, the apex court in : [2001]2scr1127 union of india and ors. v. harjeet singh sandhu held that the parameters ..... have to be disregarded on the ground that they are per incurium for the reason that they do not take into account the judgments of the supreme court reported at air 1967 sc 1268 state of orissa v. binapani dei and : [1970]1scr457 a.k. kraipak and ors. v. uoi and ors. according to the respondents, the apex .....