Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Court: delhi Page 1 of about 5,616 results (1.052 seconds)

Punny Ram and ors. Vs. Chiranji Lal Gupta and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1982Delhi431; 22(1982)DLT29b; 1982(3)DRJ342; 1982RLR576

..... of enforcement of rights and obligations of private parties. as we have observed earlier, the parliament was conscious of the conditions obtaining in the areas where the act had been in force and the extent to which the objective had been achieved when it enacted section 19(4). thereforee, clauses (a) and (b) have to be read ..... the rules enunciated may be enumerated as follows : (a) in jyoti pershad's decision rendered by the supreme court the constitutionality of the act and in particular section 19, as then in force was upheld by holding that guidlines for exercise of the power contemplated by section 19 existed in the preamble, and other provisions in chapter ii ..... plan submitted by jyoti pershad had to take some more time. he was also required on account of the first change, namely, the act coming into force, to apply under section 19 of the act for permission to execute the decrees he had obtained against his nine tenants. accordingly, he filed nine applications under section 19 of the .....

M/S Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited vs.m/s Exnxt Software Private Limited

Court : Delhi

..... deputy registrar, its re-filing had to be considered as a fresh institution and such institution was beyond the period specified under section 34(3) of the act. this is identical to the plea urged by exnxt to oppose the maintainability of the present petition.26. the supreme court rejected the aforesaid contention and ..... strength of the aforesaid judgment, submitted that findings of the arbitral tribunal are perverse and wholly unsustainable and thus amenable to challenge under section 34 of the act.16. mr jain, learned counsel appearing on behalf of exnxt raised a preliminary objection as to the maintainability of the present petition. he submitted that the ..... m.p. (comm) 337/2016 3. bharat sanchar nigam limited (hereafter bsnl ) has filed the present petition under section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 (hereafter the act ) seeking to set aside the award dated 15.03.2016 (hereafter the impugned award ) passed by the sole arbitrator. the impugned award was rendered in the .....

B.T. Menghani Vs. the Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1974Delhi159; ILR1974Delhi443

..... the owner or occupier of a building has a license to use it in any manner he likes until the zonal development plans come into force. sufficient safeguards are contained in the municipal act to prevent such misuse. it is only the authority who will not be able to invoke section 29 read with section 14 of the development ..... 226 of the constitution even though such people are put to unnecessary harassment and possible deprivation of their property. (10) rashid ahmed v. the municipal board, kairana : (1950) supreme court reports 566; engineering traders v. state of uttar pradesh and another 1973 all lj 197 and in the matter of technological institute of textile v. the inspector, ..... full justice between the parties will be done if these pleas are adjudicated after full and complete evidence. in g. veerappa pillai v. raman and raman ltd. air 1952 sc 1923 it was observed with reference to the scope of article 226 of the constitution that however extensive the jurisdiction may be, it is not so wide .....

Smt Balvinder Kaur Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... we have heard both parties and perused the record. at the outset the applicant contends that the armed forces tribunal (aft) had no jurisdiction over the case as mns officers are not included in sub section 2 (i) of the army act 1950. mns officers are governed by the indian military nursing service ordinance 1943 (ordinance 1943). this prescribes that ..... wherein the honble delhi high court heard the cases and did not transfer then to aft. the honble supreme court in case of jasbir kaur vs uoi and ors air 2004 sc 293 decided on 13/11/2003 had held that mns is a separate and distinct class . 4. the learned counsel further stated that the case of ..... to indian commissioned officers, unless they are clearly inapplicable to women . 8. para 3 of the military nursing services (india) rules states the provisions of the indian army act , 1911 shall apply to officers of the nursing services mentioned in sub section (1) of section 9 of the ordinance, as if they were indian commissioned officers and the .....

s.k. Tanwar vs.union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... dated 06.07.2016 against the petitioner, which reads as follows: article-i that the said shri s.k. tanwar, under secretary, ministry of defence, has indulged himself in an act of sexual harassment of women at workplace. article-ii that the said shri s.k. tanwar, under secretary, ministry of defence, was found misusing the office computer for watching pornographic .....

Virbhadra Singh & Anr. Vs.central Bureau of Investigation & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... (emphasis supplied) (see section 2(3)). w.p.(crl) 2757/2015 page 114 of 133 177. thus, what emerges from section 2 of the dspe act is that the dspe/ cbi is a police force constituted in delhi, primarily to carry out investigation of the notified offences in any union territory. the notification of the offences, or class of offences, which ..... conferred, or any special form of procedure w.p.(crl) 2757/2015 page 70 of 133 prescribed, by any other law for the time being in force. thus, special provisions contained in the dspe act relating to the powers of cbi are protected also by section 5 of the code.92. in view of the above specific provisions in the code, ..... petitioner no.1 was serving as a public servant at delhi, which is a union territory and hence, cbi has the jurisdiction - like the local police force, to investigate the cases under the pc act in the union territory.95. in their rejoinder, the petitioners have refuted the interpretation advanced by the cbi of om no.228/40/88-avd-ii ( .....

Collector of Customs Vs. Bhor Industries Ltd. and anr.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1985)LC363Tri(Delhi)

..... . the pre-amendment heading read: "39.01/06-artificial resins such as condensation, polycondensation, polyaddition, polymerisation and copolymerisation products, artificial plastic materials,..."." the amendment act of 1978, which came into force on 1-7-1978, inserted a new entry, more closely aligned with the headings 39.01 to 39.06 of the cccn. it reads : "39. ..... industries) were imported after 1-8-1978 on which date tariff heading 39.01/06 underwent a change by virtue of the customs tariff (amendment) act of 1978 which, came into force on 1-8-1978. the new entry made the heading fully aligned with the corresponding headings of the customs co-operation council nomenclature (cccn).8. ..... 429". the technical leaflet on the product says that it is a plasticizer for pva. the discussions and the conclusion on "santicizer 429", therefore, apply with equal force to "reoplex 400".17. in the result, we hold that both the products fall under heading no. 38.01/19(6). the show cause notice is vacated .....

Rajasthan Petro Synthetics Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1994)(72)ELT603TriDel

..... plastic, rubber, etc., whereas the disputed polypropylene dyed chips were meant for manufacturing coloured polypropylene yarn which is a textile material. there is evidently no force in the appellants contention since admittedly the disputed pigmented preparations or polypropylene dyed chips are melted with grey polypropylene chips to produce colour melt for the ..... other words, his submission was that the assessment which had been finalised in the past could only be reviewed under section 129d(2) of the customs act, 1962 and not by way of fresh adjudication proceedings, but curiously enough the collector has not dealt with this preliminary objection though he has stated this ..... 8 part ii. the entry in both the policies was "polypropylene". he also drew our attention to chapter 39 of the first schedule to the customs tariff act, 1975 to show that it includes "plastics and articles thereof". chapter note 1 under chapter 39 defines the expression "plastics" and expressly excludes textiles and .....

Fuerst Day Lawson Ltd. Vs. M/S. Jindal Exports Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1999IIAD(Delhi)265

..... , the provisions of the said enactment shall be applicable in relation to arbitration proceedings which have commenced prior to the coming into force of the new act. the new act came into force on 26.1.1996. the question thereforee, arises whether on that date the arbitration proceedings in the present four suits had commenced or not. for ..... suo moto itself under section 48(2). in this regard the observation of the supreme court in renusagar power company ltd. v. general electric company, reported in air 1983 sc 1156 is relevant and material and i quote 'under the new work convention the party against whom the award is sought to be enforced can object ..... or belongs or certified as correct incertified as correct in such other such other manner as may bemanner as may be sufficient sufficient to the law in force inaccording to the law in force in india.india.7. conditions for enforcement of 48. conditions for enforcement offoreign awards.- (1) a foreign foreign awards.- (1) enforcementaward may .....

Swadeshi Polytex Ltd. Vs. V.K. Goel and Others

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1987Delhi260

..... respect of the territories for the time being included in the union territory of delhi for all such original, appellate and other jurisdictions, as under the law in force immediately before the appointed day, is exercisable in respect of the said territories by the high court of punjab. under sub-section (2), not with standing anything ..... . hafiz mohd. said, : air1972delhi102 . the question arose as to what interpretation is to be given to the expression 'judgment' in section 10(1) of the said act. one view advanced was that the word 'judgment' should be given the same meaning which has been given by various high courts while interpreting their letters patent. the full ..... urges the counsel, the issue of copies of the record of the ghaziabad court by this court. another submission is that in the scheme of the companies act, 1956, there is no provision for any member or shareholder to obtain copies of proxies lodge with the company or the specimen signatures of the shareholders maintained .....