Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Court: delhi Page 12 of about 5,616 results (0.120 seconds)

Mar 14 1975 (HC)

The State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. New Delhi Municipal Committee

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1975Delhi223; ILR1975Delhi84

..... was concerned with the constitutionality of the bengal sales tax. the contention before the supreme court in that case was that section 2 of part c states (laws) act, 1950 must be held to be bad as being revenant to art. 248(2) of the constitution of india in so far as it conferred on the government authority ..... of delhi under the various statutes which were central statutes. the delhi laws act. 1912, the union territories (laws) act, 1950 as indeed the part c states (laws) act. 1950 were all central statutes and when a provincial act or an act which may be treated as a provincial act or state act was extended to a territory by a particular legislature, it would be ..... by a chief commissioner. the various punjab enactments which were then in force in the territory of delhi continued to be in force by virtue of the delhi laws act of 1912 and later by the part c states laws act of 1950 and the union territories laws act of 1950. the application and the later extension of this law to the union .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 1998 (HC)

Madan Lal Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1998VIIAD(Delhi)65; 4(1998)CLT368; 75(1998)DLT750

..... very much different and the had been framed to meet the situation coming within the purview of sections 71, 72 and 73 of the army act, 1950. section 71 of the army act, 1950 deals with the punishment awardable by court-martial. the provision reads as under: section 71. punishment awardable by courts martial - punishment may be ..... any period not exceeding 14 years, forfeiture of service for the purpose of increase pay, pension or any other prescribed purpose etc. there is, thereforee, force in the contention that when the court martial has chosen not to award punishment of forfeiture of pension and gratuity or other service benefits, the petitioners are ..... had been mentioned in the counter affidavit filed by the union of india before the supreme court. it was submitted that regulation 16(a) had no statutory force. the supreme court held: '....it is necessary to deal with the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the respondent. he urged the following contentions; regulation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 30 1977 (HC)

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Surendra Kumar Etc.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1978Delhi785; 1978RLR537

..... )................... (b) ................... (c) ................... (d) ................... (e)all rules, regulations, appointments, notifications, bye-laws, schemes, orders, standing orders and forms relating to transport services whether made under the delhi road transport authority act, 1950 (13 of 1950) or under the delhi municipal corporation act (66 of 1957) and in force immediately before such; establishment, shall, in so far as they are not inconsistent with the provisions of this ..... construed as references to the 'road transport corporation act, 1950 (64 of 1950)'.(24) the amending act, by section 1(2) was to be deemed to have come into force on the 3rd day of november, 1971. in view of the amending act and section 3 of the road transport corporation act, 1950 (64 of 1950), (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') a new corporation named as delhi road transport .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 01 1996 (HC)

G.S. Fateh Vs. Custodian General of Evacuee Property

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1996(37)DRJ514

..... that order of the deputy custodian general mr. s.b, capoor (later mr. justice capoor) had become final by virtue of section 28 of the administration of evacuee property act, 1950. section 28 reads as under: 'save as otherwise provided in this chapter (chapter v), every order made by custodian general, custodian, addl. custodian, authorised deputy custodian, ..... plots of land on the ground that zahid hussain did not apply for restoration of possession under section 232 of the u.p. zamindari abolition and land reforms act, 1950. the deputy custodian general has further erred in coming to the conclusion that in spite of three plots no. 1144, 1344 and 1332, he found that ..... from zahid hussain. the warrant of eviction was issued only against mohd. mosin and executed against him. the u.p. zamindari abolition and land reforms act, which came into force after the order of the addl. custodian dated 7.12.1951 by which zahid hussain and mohd. mosin were held to be unauthorised occupants prior even .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 17 1996 (HC)

G.S. Fateh Vs. Custodian General of Evacuee Property and Others

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1996Delhi358

..... order of the deputy custodian general mr. s. b. capoor (later mr. justice capoor) had become final by virtue of section 28 of the administration of evacuee property act, 1950. section 28 reads as under:'save as otherwise provided in this chapter (chapter v), every order made by custodian general, custodian, addl. custodian, authorised deputy custodian, etc. ..... plots of land on the ground that zahid hussain did not apply for restoration of possession under section 232 of the u.p. zamindari abolition and land reforms act, 1950. the deputy custodian general has further erred in coming to the conclusion that in spite of three plots no. 1144, 1344 and 1332, he found that ..... from zahid hussain. the warrant of eviction was issued only against mohd. mosin and executed against him. the u. p. zamindari abolition and land reforms act, which came into force after the order of the addi. custodian dated 7-12-1951 by which zahid hussain and mohd. mosin were held to be unauthorised occupants prior even to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 1971 (HC)

Lachmi NaraIn Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1971Delhi107; [1971]28STC21(Delhi)

..... payment of sales tax on the following grounds, namely, (1) the power given by section 2 of the union territories (law's) act 1950 to the central government to extend enactments in force, in a state to a union territory with such restrictions and modifications as it thinks fit could be exercised by the government only to ..... be questioned are the general aspects of the questions arising in this and the other connected writ petitions. (2) under section 2 of the union territories (laws) act 1950 'the central government may. by notification in the official gazette. extend to the union territory of delhi, himachal pradesh, manipur or tripura or to any part of ..... the statute and if the non-compliance with the statute deprives the tax-payers from the opportunity of representing against the tax proposals- radha kissan v. municipal committee khandwa air 1934 pc 620 municipal council khurai v. kamal kumar : [1965]2scr653 a and bagalkot city municipality v. bagalkot cement co. 1963 (suppl.) scr 710 . the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 1981 (HC)

Kundan Lal and anr. Vs. Hari Ram and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1981Delhi144; 19(1981)DLT293; ILR1981Delhi619; 1981RLR290

..... stayed the suit. (9) after the order of the senior sub judge the respondents filed a revision petition under sec. 27 of the administration of evacuee property act, 1950 (the act) on 12-4-1966 before the custodian general, new delhi, praying that the property in question was non-evacuee property and was owned by the respondents and that ..... to say that he has acquired a 'good possessory title' against every one else except the real owner is to equate him' to a wrong doer who takes possession by force or fraud, under no colour of title, no statute, and refuses to hand over possession. see kura v. deputy c. g., e. property, : air1974delhi142 . once ..... evacuee (administration of property) ordinance iv of 1947 which was repealed and replaced by the east punjab evacuee administration of property act, (act 14 of 1947). on 17-4-50, the administration of evacuee property act, act 31 of 1950, received the assent of the president of india, sec. 58 repealed the earlier laws of automatic vesting. sec. 8(2 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 2004 (HC)

Callipers Naigai Ltd. and ors. Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : II(2004)BC204; [2005]128CompCas730(Delhi); 110(2004)DLT41; 2004(73)DRJ104

..... an arbitration agreement in respect of the amount to be paid, and the provisions of section 183 of the uttar pradesh land revenue act, 1901, or section 287-a of the uttar pradesh zamindari abolition and land reforms act, 1950, as the case may be, shall mutates mutants apply in relation to such reference or enforcement as they apply in relation to ..... jurisdiction in the local area in which the office of the collector who made the certificate is situate, and the suit shall be determined in accordance with the law in force at the place where the arrear accrued or the liability for the payment of the sum arose.(3) in the suit the plaintiff may, notwithstanding anything in the last ..... in the local area in which the office of the collector who made the certificate is situate and the suit shall be determined in accordance with the law in force at the place where the arrear accrued or the liability for the payment of the sum arose. section 5-a is relevant for the purpose that the certificate may .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 2008 (HC)

Syed Mirza and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 148(2008)DLT406; 2008(101)DRJ437

..... this petition on 8th february 1990 seeking inter alias a declaration that the gali nalbandan property is not an evacuee property under the administration of evacuee property act, 1950 ('aep act 1950') and for quashing a demand raised by the delhi administration by a memorandum dated 17th january 1990 calling the petitioners to pay the arrears of rent up ..... seeking the quashing of the orders dated 4th august 1982 and 21st february 1989 of the custodian general and 4th february 1988 of the central government, there is force in the contention of the respondents that these prayers are barred by delay and laches. 24. it will be recalled that the petitioners had already filed civil suit ..... section 2(d) read with section 7 of the aep act 1950. reliance is placed on the decisions of this court in kundan lal v. hari ram : air1981delhi144 , karadia jetha kana v. managing officer-cum-collector air 1981 gujarat 27 and union of india v. seth sat narain : 18(1980)dlt490 .(b) the possession of the property .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2004 (HC)

Federation of Associations of Maharashtra and ors. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2005(79)DRJ426

..... shop is one occupied by a wholesaler where goods are kept for sale wholesale to customers resorting to the premises. (shops act, 1950).'13. learned senior counsel also sought to derive strength from the definition of `wholesaler' in section 2(x) of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices ..... officers association & ors. v. union of india : [2003]2scr1085 wherein it was observed as under:' 18. even if we assume that there is force in the material placed by the petitioners that by forming new railway zones efficiency in the railway administration would not enhance, the reasons given by the government ..... clarification states that b2b sales is permissible under the policy, which cannot be termed as retail trade. the said clarification/letter is as under:' by speed post / air mailamendment no. : 1no. fc.ii. : 563(2000)/651(2000)-amendgovernment of indiaministry of commerce & industrydepartment of industrial policy & promotionsecretariat for industrial assistanceforeign collaboration - ii .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //