Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Sorted by: recent Court: delhi Page 1 of about 5,665 results (0.180 seconds)

Jan 21 2019 (HC)

s.k. Tanwar vs.union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... dated 06.07.2016 against the petitioner, which reads as follows: article-i that the said shri s.k. tanwar, under secretary, ministry of defence, has indulged himself in an act of sexual harassment of women at workplace. article-ii that the said shri s.k. tanwar, under secretary, ministry of defence, was found misusing the office computer for watching pornographic .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 06 2017 (HC)

Rohit Mahajan vs.rajiv Bhardwaj

Court : Delhi

..... the previous sanction of the state government direct that the suits of that class shall, for the purposes of court fees act, 1870, and of the suits valuation act and any other enactment for the time being in force, be treated as if their subject-matter were of such value as the high court thinks fit to specify in that ..... accordance with the provisions of rule 8 of chapter 3-c of punjab high court rules and orders, volume i and provisions of section 9 of the suits valuation act. 9. the aforesaid dicta deals with a suit for partition of immovable property. in a suit for partition of immovable property, the shares of the parties in ..... jurisdiction is rs.2 crores, is not competent to entertain the suit.8. the counsel for the petitioner / defendant, on being asked the provisions of the suits valuation act, 1887 which determine the valuation for the purpose of jurisdiction of the reliefs aforesaid, has drawn attention to, jagdish pershad vs. joti pershad 1975 rlr203followed in ramesh chand .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 31 2017 (HC)

M/S Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited vs.m/s Exnxt Software Private Limited

Court : Delhi

..... deputy registrar, its re-filing had to be considered as a fresh institution and such institution was beyond the period specified under section 34(3) of the act. this is identical to the plea urged by exnxt to oppose the maintainability of the present petition.26. the supreme court rejected the aforesaid contention and ..... strength of the aforesaid judgment, submitted that findings of the arbitral tribunal are perverse and wholly unsustainable and thus amenable to challenge under section 34 of the act.16. mr jain, learned counsel appearing on behalf of exnxt raised a preliminary objection as to the maintainability of the present petition. he submitted that the ..... m.p. (comm) 337/2016 3. bharat sanchar nigam limited (hereafter bsnl ) has filed the present petition under section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 (hereafter the act ) seeking to set aside the award dated 15.03.2016 (hereafter the impugned award ) passed by the sole arbitrator. the impugned award was rendered in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2017 (HC)

Virbhadra Singh & Anr. Vs.central Bureau of Investigation & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... (emphasis supplied) (see section 2(3)). w.p.(crl) 2757/2015 page 114 of 133 177. thus, what emerges from section 2 of the dspe act is that the dspe/ cbi is a police force constituted in delhi, primarily to carry out investigation of the notified offences in any union territory. the notification of the offences, or class of offences, which ..... conferred, or any special form of procedure w.p.(crl) 2757/2015 page 70 of 133 prescribed, by any other law for the time being in force. thus, special provisions contained in the dspe act relating to the powers of cbi are protected also by section 5 of the code.92. in view of the above specific provisions in the code, ..... petitioner no.1 was serving as a public servant at delhi, which is a union territory and hence, cbi has the jurisdiction - like the local police force, to investigate the cases under the pc act in the union territory.95. in their rejoinder, the petitioners have refuted the interpretation advanced by the cbi of om no.228/40/88-avd-ii ( .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2017 (HC)

Hpl (India) Limited & Ors vs.qrg Enterprises and Another

Court : Delhi

..... ) no.12/2017 page 20 of 52 held that section 13(2) ousted the applicability of the letters patent or other laws for the time being in force which included the delhi high court act, 1966.22. it was submitted that the decision of the bombay high court in hubtown limited (supra) did not lay down the correct law and would not ..... high court of delhi. (underlining added) fao (os) (comm) no.12/2017 page 17 of 52 17. it was submitted that the delhi high court act, 1966 would be the law for the time being in force within the meaning of section 104 of the cpc which, in turn, specifically stipulates that an appeal shall lie from the orders enumerated therein, save ..... there is anything any adjudication from which an appeal lies as an appeal having effect by virtue of any law for the time being in force other than this act. ii. relevant provisions of the cpc 2. definitions. in repugnant in the subject or context,-- xxxx decree means the formal expression of an adjudication (2) which, so far as regards .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 11 2016 (HC)

Bharti Airtel Limited Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

..... the parties. per section 28(a) thereof, the disputes submitted to arbitration are to be decided in accordance with the substantive law for the time being in force in india. i have already hereinabove observed that the expression public policy of india in section 34(2)(b)(ii) has also been held to inter alia mean ..... said amendments was that the telecom regulatory authority of india (amendment) act, 2000 ( trai amendment act ) came into force with retrospective effect from 24th january 2000. the trai amendment act inserted chapter iv in the telecom regulatory authority of india act, 1997 ( trai act ). under section 14 of the trai act, as amended, the central government established the telecom disputes settlement and ..... , 2012 in omp no.77/2003 is subject matter of fao (os) no.87/2013; (k) reliance is placed on suganmal vs. state of madhya pradesh air 1965 sc 1740 and union of india vs. m/s orient enterprises (1998) 3 scc 501 to contend that a writ petition under article 226 is not maintainable .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 11 2015 (HC)

Manoj Kumar Agarwal Vs. C B I and Ors

Court : Delhi

..... check period includes the period that the petitioner has served in the state of west bengal, cbi ought to have taken the consent under section 6 dspe act. i do not find force in this submission of the counsel for the petitioner either. it is an admitted position that though for a majority of the check period, the petitioner was ..... or the chief commissioner as the case may be; extension of the powers and jurisdiction of members of a police force belonging to any unit to railway areas outside that unit."it is manifest that the special police act was passed in terms of the said entry imposing prohibition on the federal legislature to enact any law permitting the ..... the governor general in council in exercise of the powers conferred by the government of india act, 1935 (entry 39 of list i, seventh schedule). the said entry reads as under:"extension of the powers and jurisdiction of members of a police force belonging to any part of british india to any area in another governor's province or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 2012 (HC)

Securities and Exchange Board of India Vs. Crb Capital Market Ltd.

Court : Delhi

..... powers of the company court under sections 391/392 of the companies act, 1956. all that section 45q says is that the provisions of chapter iii-b of the rbi act shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force. there is nothing inconsistent in the provision of section 391 of ..... the companies act with the provisions of chapter iii-b of the rbi act and therefore it cannot be said that in ..... a winding-up petition under section 45mc of the rbi act an application under section 391 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 2012 (HC)

Reserve Bank of India Vs. Crb Capital Markets Ltd.

Court : Delhi

..... powers of the company court under sections 391/392 of the companies act, 1956. all that section 45q says is that the provisions of chapter iii-b of the rbi act shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force. there is nothing inconsistent in the provision of section 391 of ..... the companies act with the provisions of chapter iii-b of the rbi act and therefore it cannot be said that in ..... a winding-up petition under section 45mc of the rbi act an application under section 391 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 2012 (HC)

Malanpur Steel Ltd. Vs. Crb Capital Markets Ltd.

Court : Delhi

..... powers of the company court under sections 391/392 of the companies act, 1956. all that section 45q says is that the provisions of chapter iii-b of the rbi act shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force. there is nothing inconsistent in the provision of section 391 of ..... the companies act with the provisions of chapter iii-b of the rbi act and therefore it cannot be said that in ..... a winding-up petition under section 45mc of the rbi act an application under section 391 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //