Air 1975 Mad 33 - Judgment Search Results
In Re: N. Narasimhan and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-06-1975
Reported in: AIR1975Mad330
1. Mohan J., having found a conflict between Komalangiammal v. Sowbagiammal, 59 Mad LJ 529 = (AIR 1931 Mad 37) decided by a Division Bench and Jayakumar v. Ramarathnam, , of
N. Ethirajulu Naidu Vs. K.R. Chinnikrishnan Chettiar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-02-1974
Reported in: AIR1975Mad333
is settled law that an implied promise is not sufficient. In fact, in Govinda Nair v. Achutan Nair, AIR 1940 Mad 678, this court held as follows--"The promise referred to in Section 25, Sub-section (3) Contract Act, … WN 547; Govind Das v. Sarjudas, (1908) ILR 30 All 268; Manraj Sath v. Sethrup Chand (1906) ILR 33 Cal 1047, and Mukhilal v. Gul Muhammad, AIR 1933 Lah 209."The distinction between an acknowledgment under Section 18
N.R. Radhakrishnan Vs. N. Dhanalakshmi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-28-1974
Reported in: AIR1975Mad331; (1975)1MLJ439
Matched in: Citation AIR1975Mad331; (1975)1MLJ439
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Union of India (Uoi) Vs. T.L. Dakshinamurthy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-02-1974
Reported in: AIR1975Mad337; (1975)1MLJ269
Matched in: Citation AIR1975Mad337; (1975)1MLJ269
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free