Air 1962 All 3 - Judgment Search Results
Ram Saran Tewari Vs. Raj Bahadur Varma and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-22-1961
Reported in: AIR1962All315
to the effect that Nyaya Panchayats are as courts subordinate to this Court within the meaning of Section 3 of the Contempt of Courts Act. They may be 'courts' but I am not persuaded to hold them … hold them to be subordinate to this Court. in the case of Sukhdeo Baiswar v. Brij Bhusan, : AIR1951All667 referred to by them. I did hold that they are subordinate to this Court but I revised the
Jairam Singh and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-04-1959
Reported in: AIR1962All350
ORDERD.S. Mathur, J.1. This order governs Civil Misc. Writ Nos. 412 and 413 of 1957 by Jai Ram Singh, and Dharambir Singh and two others, respectively. As the facts of the two cases are virtually the...
Chandu Lal and anr. Vs. Ram Autar and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-13-1961
Reported in: AIR1962All357
any of the grounds given in Section 30. 6. In the case of Kalka Singh v. Indradeo Singh, AIR 1957 All 781 brother Mukerji expressed the view that: 'Under Section 33 it is competent for a party … has been entered into under duress and undue influence and so the award was set aside under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act. 3. The only point which has been canvassed in this case is that an
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ramchand Vs. Moti Thad and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-22-1962
Reported in: AIR1962All353
by implication. The same viewwas taken in a decision of the Lahore High Courtin Emperor v. Gyan Chand, AIR 1946 Lah 265.There is, therefore, force in the preliminary objection relating to the maintainability thepresent reference. 6. We … worked out to Rs. 88,600/-. A rebate of Rs. 10,000/- was, however, allowed if a sum of Rs. 36,000/- was paid in advance on the date of the commencement of the lease, and the remaining amount of
Jessa Ram Fateh Chand Vs. Official Liquidators and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-30-1961
Reported in: AIR1962All370
to a Full Bench decision of this Court in Maheshwari Bros. v. Official Liquidators, Indra Sugar Works Ltd., AIR 1942 All 119. The facts of that case were similar to ours and the learned Judges who constituted … B, a firm deposited a large sum of money with A, a company under an agreement. In Clause 3 of that agreement the deposit wag specifically earmarked as security for the due performance of the agreement. Under
Raghu Nath Dass and ors. Vs. Rajendra Kumar and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-19-1961
Reported in: AIR1962All344
first decision on this point was given by a Division Bench in Dharam Singh v. Bishan Sarup : AIR1938All1 which case came up to this Court as arising out of proceedings under Section 33 of the Act. … the defendants. The defendants executed a promissory note for this amount in favour of the plaintiff on the 3rd of December 1934 and at the same time executed a receipt explaining how the whole of the consideration
Lal Chand Vs. Bharat Nidhi Ltd.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-10-1961
Reported in: AIR1962All378
persuaded to agree that the view that I expressed in the case of Phul Kumari v. State : AIR1957All495 requires reconsideration. These revision applications are not maintainable and must be dismissed.Ramabhadban, J.3. These two revision petitions arise
Abdul Qavi Khan Vs. God Almighty Through Asaf Ali Khan and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-14-1961
Reported in: AIR1962All364
of Chagla J., as he then was, sitting singly in the case of Ismail Haji v. Umar Abdulla, AIR 1942 Bom 155. 15. There is, as already observed, a clear finding of fact of the learned single … |Abdul Qavi Khan Mohd. Shafi Khan Smt. Matluban Smt. Maqbul Unnisa= Smt. Mumtaz Begam= (Plaintiff) (Defdt. 2) (Defdt. 3) Dr. Niaz Ali Khan Mohd. Wali Khan (Issueless) (Brother of Dr. Niaz Ali Khan) ____________________|_____ | | Sehat
State of U.P. Vs. Ram Charan
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-26-1961
Reported in: AIR1962All359
does not matter that ihe progress was interrupted. A similar view was taken in Rahamat Ali v. Emperor, AIR 1927 Lah 634 and Emperor v. Chandkha Salabatkha, ILR 37 Bom 553. In the latter case the accused, … the respondent Ram Charan of an offence under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act read with Clause 3 of U.P. Wheat (Restriction on Movement) Order, 1940, (hereinafter referred to as the Order).2. At about 5-30 p.
Khalil Ahmad Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-12-1961
Reported in: AIR1962All383
case. We are supported in this view by the Bombay High Court in State v. Sharifbhai Jamalbhai : AIR1959Bom192 and Dawood Ali Arif v. Deputy Commissioner of Police : AIR1958Cal565 . We were referred to the case … India under a Pakistani Passport No. 09531 dated 9-1-1953 bearing Indian, visa No. 546 of Category 'C' dated 3-1-1957 issued by the Indian High Commissioner in Pakistan at Karachi. The visa was valid up till the 25th
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free