Air 1954 Cal 41 - Judgment Search Results
Sushil Kumar Chakravarty Vs. Rajendra Lal Bhattachariya and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-27-1953
Reported in: AIR1954Cal412
195(e), Bengal Tenancy Act, Section 11, Putni Regulation would prevail.In the case of -- 'Bidhu Mukhi v. Asmatulla', AIR 1916 Cal 519 (D) ganderson, C. J. and Mookerjee J. held that if a 'durputni' lease expressly authorised
East India Film Studios Vs. P.K. Mukherjee and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-29-1952
Reported in: AIR1954Cal41,58CWN152
Chand De v. Gopinath Dey', which was cited by Mr. Sen and is reported in -- ' : AIR1952Cal705 at p. 710 (A). The proposition that I have stated above finds place in Burrows' Words & Phrases, … the purpose of such business he has his building, studio laboratory situated at Tollygunge in the suburbs of Calcutta. In the year 1942, the building, studio, laboratory and the garages belonging to the petitioner were requisitioned by … on 20-6-1944 and this reference was registered as Land Acquisition Case No. 41/44.3. It appears that thereafter, arbitrators were purported to have been appointed by
Jayaswal Shipping Company Vs. the Owners and Parties Interested in Ste ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-23-1953
Reported in: AIR1954Cal415,58CWN468
took the same view on this point in -- 'Bengal Assam Steamship Co., Ltd. v. Shankar Maru' : AIR1937Cal122 .14. The crux of the problem of interpretation presented in this case before me arises, however, on the … plaintiff by the defendant for supplyingnecessaries in connection with the operations ofthe said vessel at the port of Calcutta. It is conceded and admitted by Mr. B. Choudhury, learned counsel for the defendants, that necessaries were supplied.He,
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free