Air 1950 Cal 16 - Judgment Search Results
Tobacco Manufactures (India) Ltd. Vs. Mrs. Marian Stewart
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-02-1949
Reported in: AIR1950Cal164
S.N. Banerjee, J.1. This is an appeal by the employer from an order made by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, West Bengal, awarding compensation against the employer to the widow of the deceased workman in the...
Sailendra Nath Sen, Auction-purchaser Vs. Sudhanya Charan Das Naiya an ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-23-1949
Reported in: AIR1950Cal166
the case of Mahipati Haldar v. Atul Krishna, 53 C. W. N. 587: (A. I. R. (36) 1949 Cal. 212). It was held there that Section 18, Limitation Act may be availed of to extend the period … the decision of the learned Munsif. Reliance is placed on the case of Durga, Charm v. Bishnupada : AIR1927Cal833 , for the proposition that if there be a joint application under Sections 173 and 174 (3), Bengal
National Investment Co. Ltd. Vs. Mohendra Nath Kundu and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-20-1949
Reported in: AIR1950Cal163
of the landlord's interest, a co-sharer tenant remains co-sharer tenant.13. In Amjat Talukdar v. Rohini Kanta Bhattacharjee : AIR1942Cal68 , Henderson J. sitting singly, had to consider exactly the question as is now be-fore us, and decided
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Abdul Majid Vs. the King
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-12-1949
Reported in: AIR1950Cal165
I would refer to a decision of this Court in the case of Panahanan Mukherjee v. Emperor : AIR1929Cal257 . Further, the investigating officer himself says that he carried out the investigation in accordance with the provisions … the learned Magistrate and direct that copies of the statements made by persons to the police who are called as witnesses in this case be supplied to the accused whether they are signed or unsigned or whether … entirely wrong. An accused person is entitled under the provisions of Section 162, Criminal P. C., to get copies of the statements made by persons
Tetri Vs. Ram Newaj
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-23-1949
Reported in: AIR1950Cal168
(A. I. R. (10) 1923 Cal. 456: 24 Cr. L. J. 945) and Kanangammal v. Pandara Nadar : AIR1927Mad376 . The facts in these cases are quite different. In those cases the wife after an order for
Sm. Champa Devi Vs. Babulal Goenka
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-09-1949
Reported in: AIR1950Cal161,54CWN207
was of the opinion that in view of a decision in the case of Adeluddin v. Emperor : AIR1945Cal482 , by a Divisional Bench of this Court consisting of Lodge J. and our learned brother himself, it … was an accused under trial on a charge under Section 323, Penal Code, before a Presidency Magistrate of Calcutta on the com-plaint of one Babulal Goenka, the opposite party. As our learned brother thought that the rule
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free