Air 1949 All 1 - Judgment Search Results
Nasib Kohar Vs. Raghunath Misir and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-03-1947
Reported in: AIR1949All111
of Gorakhpur, directing the plaint to be returned for presentation to the proper Court under Order 43, Rule 1, Civil P.C.2. The suit was brought under Section 33, U.P. Agriculturists' Relief Act (Act No. XXVII [27] of
Jumman Khan Vs. Bhoorey Khan
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-13-1948
Reported in: AIR1949All161
Defendants 2 and 3 denied that they were partners in the partnersbip. Jumman Khan, defendant 1, stated that 1949 he was the sole proprietor of the firm, Forward Glass Works, Firozabad and the plaintiff not a partner … is placed upon a ruling of this Court in Inayat Husain v. Bashir Ahmad and Anr 0049/1932 : AIR1932All413 .6. Before 1939, the court-fee payable in suits for accounts was to be calculated in accordance with the
NavIn Chander Vs. Mulu
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-03-1948
Reported in: AIR1949All175
before it on the ground that no appeal lay. The proceedings were initiated by an application under Section 142, U.P. Tenancy Act, in the Court of the Tahsildar. They were subsequently transferred to the Court of an
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Badri Prasad Vs. Nirmal Singh and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-30-1948
Reported in: AIR1949All179
basis of a promissory note executed by the respondent for a sum of Rs. 700 on 3rd October 1938, carrying interest at the rate of one per cent. per mensem. It would appear that the loan was
Meri Mal Vs. Mt. Sharifan and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-26-1948
Reported in: AIR1949All194
parties. He has relied upon a decision of this Court in Munshi Bishan Lal v. Banwari Lal : AIR1939All713 . That was a converse case. It was held in that case that the mere fact that the … Seth, J.1. This is a defendant-vendee's appeal arising out of a suit for pre-emption. On the 26th November 1942, one Bashir Mohammad Khan executed a gale deed in respect of the property in dispute in favour of
Ashraf Vs. Karim Bux and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-26-1948
Reported in: AIR1949All198
appellants relied on a number of cases, the principal among them being Kunjabehari Chakrabarty v. Krishnadhone Majumdar : AIR1940Cal489 and the Privy Council case in Radha Raman Shaha v. Pran Nath Roy 28 Cal. 475. In the … plaintiffs' appeal arising out of a suit for a declaration that an ex parte decree dated 20th February 1942, obtained by the defendant in Suit No. 518 of 1941 of the Court of Munsif, Koil, Aligarh, was
Chandrika Vs. Rex
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-06-1948
Reported in: AIR1949All176; 1949CriLJ228
it otherwise than in appeal are not taken away : vide Shah Chaturbhuj v. Shah Matiji Bam : AIR1938All456 and Ashraf v. Saith Mai : AIR1938All47 . There is, thus, no force in the contention that Section … This iS an application for the re-hearing of an appeal which was decided and dismissed on 26th June 1948, under the following circumstances.2. On an application being made, a date was fixed for the hearing of the
Saghir Ahmad Vs. Rex
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-10-1948
Reported in: AIR1949All190; 1949CriLJ243
orders of the Provincial Government, passed in accordance with the U. P. Maintenance of Public Order (Temporary) Act, 1947. A preliminary objection has been raised by the learned Assistant Government Advocate. He contends that inasmuch as the
Gorey and anr. Vs. Rex
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-13-1948
Reported in: AIR1949All191; 1949CriLJ250
ORDERAgarwalla, J.1. Gorey, Bhagwan, Ram Dayal, Earn Singh and Murli were charged under Section 304 read with Sections 149, 325 read with Section 149 and 147, Penal Code for being members of an unlawful assembly and, in
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free