Air 1944 Cal 2 - Judgment Search Results
Khetai Molla Vs. Nityananda Sarkar and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-25-1942
Reported in: AIR1944Cal263
Defendant 1 borrowed a sum of Rs. 5999 from one Gopiballav Sarkar, the predecessor-in-ihterest of the plaintiffs on 20th April 1921. There was a stipulation to pay interest at the rate of 12 per cent, per annum
Mahendra Nath Surul and anr. Vs. Netai Charan Ghosh and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-22-1942
Reported in: AIR1944Cal241
in the terms of the section to limit its application to non-testamentary documents; but our attention has been called to the decision in Shyam Lal v. Rarneswari ('16) 3 A.I.R 1916 Cal. 938. where this Court observed … who died about 30 years ago (see the evidence of p. W. 2); but it does not follow that he wrote the names of the … been treated as such in a subsequent case in this Court, Gobinda Chandra Pal v. Pulin Behary : AIR1927Cal102 , where it was held that the section does apply to wills as much as to other documents.
Province of Bangal Vs. Ram Chandra Bhotika and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-13-1942
Reported in: AIR1944Cal247
on a decision of the Madras High Court in Revenue Divisional Officer, Vizagapatam v. Vyricherla Narayana Gajapati-raju : AIR1937Mad902 That decision is, however, merely an authority for the proposition that, on a reference to the Court under … Edgley, J.1. This Rule is directed against the Order of the President of the Calcutta Improvement Tribunal, dated 20th September 1940, in which he directed that compensation to the extent of Rs. 8650 … against the Order of the President of the Calcutta Improvement Tribunal, dated 20th September 1940, in which he directed that compensation to the extent of
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Anil Kumar Basu Vs. Roy Biman Behari Mitra for Self and Executor to Es ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-08-1944
Reported in: AIR1944Cal240
a rent decree against the appellant and hiecosharers In respect of tenure for a sum of about Rs. 2000. The appellant on the other hand, obtained rent decrees against the respondents in 24 rent suits for various
Sm. Malati Bala Deb Gupta Vs. Narendra Chandra Bhattacharjee S/O Bhara ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-20-1944
Reported in: AIR1944Cal253
Bench of this Court which is to be found reported in Prosanna Kumar Roy v. Adyasakti Dasi : AIR1942Cal586 . This was a case under section 26F, Bengal Tenancy Act, as it stood prior to the recent … J.1. This Rule is directed against an appellate judgment of S.K. Sen Esq., District Judge of Tippera, dated 21st July 1942, affirming an Order made by the Subordinate Judge, 2nd Court of that place by which he
Joy Chand Seraogi and anr. Vs. Dole Gobinda Das and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-28-1944
Reported in: AIR1944Cal272
Roy v. Kamini Kumar ('26) 13 A.I.R. 1926 Cal. 765 and Nandan Sahu v. Fateh Bahadur Singh : AIR1940All104 . On the view taken in those cases, Dolegobinda would be a person 'bound by law to pay' … Debi and others, the executors to the estate of Indra Nayaran Singh at an annual rent of Rs. 2369. For brevity's sake this patni would hereafter be called the 'four anna patni.' The said executors in their
Jatindra Gupta and ors. Vs. Emperor
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-16-1944
Reported in: AIR1944Cal284
It was as a result of those applications that the Rule in question was granted. On 15th January 1944, another ordinance, Ordinance 3 of 1944, was promulgated by the Governor-General which recites:Whereas an emergency has arisen which … On 7th September 1943, a Bench of this Court issued a Rule under g S: 491, Criminal P.C. calling upon the Chief Secretary to the Government of Bengal and the Superintendent of the Dacca Central Jail to … the same footing. There, however, is one exception, namely, that of petitioner 21, Piyush Kiron Eauth, whose papers have not been available, and his case
Sri Sri Raj Rajeswar Thakur Represanted by Managing Shebait and Next F ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-10-1944
Reported in: AIR1944Cal287
ORDERHanderson, J.1. This Rule has been issued in connexion with a proceeding under Section 88, Ben. Ten. Act. I have already dealt with the question common to this and the connected rules in my previous judgment...
Bhupendra Nath Chatterjee and ors. Vs. Sm. Trinayani Devi
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-16-1944
Reported in: AIR1944Cal289
failed to prove the special damage, which was the gist of his case. The case in ('79) 4 Cal 583, Raj Chandra Royv Shama Sundari next demands our attention. This ease arose out of a suit commenced … property. The matter again came up for consideration before this Court in Imperial Tobacco Co.v A. Bonnan : AIR1928Cal1 This was a suit brought by the plaintiff-respondent to recover damages from the defendant-appellant inter alia on the … Ganguly, on the other, ever since 1913. The plaintiff's purchase is dated 20th February 1334, after her purchase she applied to the Chairman, Bally Municipality,
Abdus Salam Vs. Haji Abdul Aziz
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-01-1944
Reported in: AIR1944Cal299
quoted with approval the obiter of this Court in Atimannessa Bibi v. Abdul Sobhan ('16) 3 A.I.R. 1916 Cal. 894. Thereafter Mukammil Ali's mother made an application before the District Judge for being appointed the guardian of … guardian of the person and property of her minor son. This application was under the Guardianship Act. On 22nd December 1942, the learned District Judge appointed her guardian of the person and property of her minor son
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free