Agreement - Judgment Search Results

Labour Contract Society Vs. Jangaon Municipal Sanitary Works and Labou ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(4)ALT344

that the learned Single Judge is right in dismissing the contract which was granted in favour of the appellant.5. It was

In Re: Agreement Relating to Nylon

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1976)46CompCas357NULL

petition furnished information with regard to the making of the agreement and its operation and furnished a copy of the agreement.

Contract Laghu Udyog Kamgar Union Vs. V.G. Mohite, Assistant Labour Co ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2001(3)ALLMR597; 2002(1)BomCR197; (2001)4BOMLR691; [2002(93)FLR58]; (2001)IILLJ1398Bom

in any other law or in the terms of the agreement of contract of service, or in standing order applicable to

The Karnataka Contract Labour and Transport Co-op. Society Ltd. and Ot ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1994Kant147; ILR1993KAR3417; 1993(4)KarLJ472

Theauthorities without calling fresh tenders had entered into a supplemental agreement with fresh terms and conditions in favour of the appellant

Bharath Electronics Contract Labour Union, Bangalore, Rep. by Its Gene ...

Court: Karnataka

not automatically apply in finding out whether the contract labour agreement is a sham, nominal and is a mere camouflage. For

An Agreement to Sell Requires the Proposed Vendor Vs. the State of Har ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

measuring 3456 sq. ft. It is part execution of the agreement to sell, which was being sought. The complaint relates to

Delhi University Contract Employees’ Union and Ors. Vs.university of ...

Court: Delhi

the appellants who had been working with the respondent-University on contract basis. LPA9892013 Page 44 of 49 Petition not maintainable 98.

Contract Laghu Udyog Kamgar Union Vs. Shri S.N. Saundankar, Presiding ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2007(3)BomCR325; [2007(113)FLR795]; (2007)ILLJ1065Bom

of service. The Supreme Court held as follows:As per the agreement the Bank has detailed the subsidy and other facilities afforded

Kothari Contract Interiors Through Its Partner Smt. Pooja Kothari Vs. ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (2007)10VST60(All)

is not based on the turn over but on the agreement to pay the tax in lump sum i.e. the demand

Pondicherry Contract Carriage Owners' Association rep. by its Presiden ...

Court: Chennai

therefore, a policy decision was taken to introduce a new taxation measure under Act 13 of 2012 in accordance with the