Agency By Estoppel - Judgment Search Results

Bhagwanji Morarji Goculdas Vs. the Alembic Chemical Works Co. Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1943Bom385; (1944)46BOMLR265

1907. It is an agreement, of a type common in this country, and usually known as a managing agency agreement : indeed so common have these agreements become that the Legislature has intervened by a group of … and B.D. Amin which incorporated all the provisions and terms of the agreement of December 7, 1907. No estoppel has been pleaded nor is any relied on.12. This second contention was not relied upon in the Court

Cox And Kings Ltd. Vs. Sap India Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

itself. Unlike other bases for binding a non­ signatory to an arbitration agreement (such as agency, alter ego, estoppel, third party beneficiary, or assignment), the group of companies doctrine was developed specifically in the arbitration context and … of Tokyo v. Karoon, [1987]. AC454 [2004]. EWHC121(Comm) 31 exists to create separate legal entities, and a general agency relationship would defeat this purpose. The Court held therein: “65. In commercial terms the creation of a corporate

Chloro Controls (i) Pvt Ltd. Vs. Severn Trent Water Purification Inc. ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

some length and relied on more traditional principles, such as, the non- signatory being an alter ego, estoppel, agency and third party beneficiaries to find jurisdiction over the non-signatories.71. The Court will have to examine such pleas

Astonfield Renewables Pvt. Ltd. & Anr vs.ravinder Raina

Court: Delhi

at some length and relied on more traditional principles, such as, the non-signatory being an alter ego, estoppel, agency and third-party beneficiaries to find jurisdiction over the non-signatories.76. The Court will have to examine such pleas with

Rachapudi Subramanyam and ors. Vs. the District Collector and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1974AP55

change his position. Is it, however, true, where the principal happens to be the Government and the administrative agency estopped from denying the correctness of the prior advice or assurance given or representation made to a citizen … or is entitled to rely. It is in this sense it was contended that the respondent was bound by estoppel. The principle of estoppel indisputably applies to cases where private citizens alone are concerned. In other words, when

indo Asian Switchgears (P.) Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assistant

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (1985)12ITD65(Delhi)

re-enact them. Being legislative in character, such orders cannot be assailed on the basis of the doctrine of estoppel. Such orders represent delegated legislation. Such delegated legislation is not to be regarded as some form of inferior … there were not built into our Constitution an adequate system of executive legislation.Union of India v. Anglo Afghan Agencies AIR 1968 SC 718. These orders are statutory instruments and can be amended from time to time. The

Lloyds Bank, Ltd. Vs. P.E. Guzdar and Co.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1930Cal22,121Ind.Cas.625

the election in Briggs v. Jones [1870] 10 Eq. 92 and whether this equitable rule is founded upon estoppel by representation or agency it is clearly established that conduct on the part of the first mortgagee which … Macpherson [1903] 31 Cal. 57, Coggan v. Pogose [1884] 11 Cal. 158, Gokul Dass v. Eastern Mortgage and Agency Co. [1905] 33 Cal. 410.3. It is necessary, therefore, to ascertain the circumstances in which the two mortgages

Tenet Vs. Doe

Court: US Supreme Court

2005 Respondent husband and wife filed suit against the United States and the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), asserting estoppel and due process claims for the CIA’s alleged failure to provide them with financial assistance

Moore Stephens (a Firm) (Respondents) Vs. Stone Rolls Limited (In Liqu ...

Court: House of Lords

“general rules of attribution” that apply equally in the case of natural persons, such as principles of agency, estoppel, ostensible authority in contract or vicarious liability in tort. 41. At p. 507 Lord Hoffmann commented: “The company’s … which he is vicariously liable or which is otherwise attributed to him under principles of the law of agency. 9. The first answer to Mr Sumption’s case advanced on behalf of SandR by Mr Brindle QC founds

Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Company (Appellant) Vs. the Min ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

Heilbron accepts that Dallah cannot rely on the last ten words. Dallah is not advancing a case of agency, and the Ordinance does not support a case of agency. The tribunal's comment at this point is on … written case Dallah also argued that the first partial award gave rise, under English law, to an issue estoppel on the issue of jurisdiction, having regard to the Government's deliberate decision not to institute proceedings in France