Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Advisement - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 10 1990

Scientific Adviser to the Ministry of Defence and ors. Vs. S. Daniel a ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-10-1990

Reported in: JT1990(2)SC544; (1990)IILLJ295SC; 1990(1)SCALE731; 1990Supp(1)SCC374; [1990]2SCR440; 1991(3)SLJ29(SC); (1990)1UPLBEC617

the Director is not competent to initiate disciplinary proceedings against them and that it is only the Scientific Adviser to the Government of India - a higher authority - that can do so. This contention, based on


Oct 07 1994

Indian Management Advisers and Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on: Oct-07-1994

Reported in: (1994)51ITD566(Delhi)

1. These two appeals, one by the assessee and the other by the revenue for the assessment year 1990-91 are directed against order of CIT (Appeals)-I, New Delhi dated 22-12-1993. As common points are involved, these...


Apr 17 1989

M.W. Edwards Vs. Financial Adviser and Chief Accounts Officer

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-17-1989

Reported in: 1989Supp(2)SCC502

K.N. Singh and; Kuldip Singh, JJ..1. Special leave granted.2. The main question involved in the present appeal is whether the appellant is entitled to avail the benefit of 10 years' period of service rendered by him...


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 20 2005

Laxmi Construction Co. Vs. Financial Adviser and Chief Accounts Office ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-20-2005

Reported in: AIR2005AP199; 2005(2)ALD320

Paras 8 and 9 of the counter-affidavit as hereunder:'The Dy. Chief Engineer/Gauge Conversion/South Central Railway/Gluntakal, in turn, has advised the petitioner that the amount to be paid. As the petitioner-company consistently refused to agree to pay the


Jan 27 2014

Cwp No.6645 of 1989 (Oandm) Vs. Adviser to the Administrator U.T. Chan ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-27-2014

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.6645 of 1989 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 27, 2014 Kulbir Singh Sara …..Petitioner Versus Adviser to the Administrator, U.T., Chandigarh and others …..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH


Jul 09 2014

Present: Mr. Rajiv Kataria Advocate Vs. Adviser to the Adminstrator U. ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-09-2014

& HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.6083 of 1993 (O&M) Date of decision :09. 07.2014 Kharaiti Lal ...Petitioner versus Adviser to the Adminstrator, U.T Chd and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present: Mr. Rajiv Kataria,


Jul 04 2000

M.R. Subhadra Vs. Financial Adviser and Chief Controller of Accounts, ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jul-04-2000

Reported in: 2001(1)ALD112; 2000(4)ALT602

effect from 20-8-1973 and to give all consequential benefits by setting aside the Memorandum issued by the Financial Advisor of erstwhile Board on 22-10-1986 declaring the successful completion of the period of probation of various UDCs., including


Jun 01 1995

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Adviser to the Administration, Union Terri ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jun-01-1995

Reported in: AIR1996P& H69

On July 29, 1993 the dealing hand noted that there was no record to this effect available, but advised that the Chief Commissioner was competent to add or withdraw any house from the Chandigarh Administration Pool under


Mar 27 2000

Sikka Promoters Private Limited Vs. the Adviser to the Administrator, ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-27-2000

Reported in: (2000)125PLR631

remove telephone pole/wires from the spot.5. On 12.6.1989, the petitioner-Company received letter (Annexure P-8) from the respondent No.3 advising it to contact the Sub Divisional Officer (Electricity) OP. Sub Division No.7, Chandigarh, for removal of the pole.


Apr 10 1989

Vijayvikram College of Engineering, Bangalore Vs. Deputy Educational A ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Apr-10-1989

Reported in: AIR1990Kant29; 1989(3)KarLJ338

of the University Grants Commission Act ('the UGC Act') states thus:'In view of the above provisions, you are advised to delete the word 'University' from its existing name and also to stop, awarding degrees if any forthwith


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial