Advertisement - Judgment Search Results

Crayons Advertising Ltd Vs. Crayon Advertising

Court: Delhi

It is stated that there is no proof given of advertisement of their name and hence there is nothing to show

Links Advertisers and Business Promoters Vs. Commissioner, Corporation ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1977SC1646; 1977(2)KarLJ151; (1977)3SCC204; [1977]3SCR670; 1977(9)LC411(SC)

advertisements were affixed just behind the compound wall and the advertisements did not face the street at all but faced the

Advertising Club and ors. Vs. Central Board of Excise and Customs and ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2001(77)ECC322; 2001(131)ELT35(Mad); [2003]264ITR386(Mad); (2001)2MLJ656; 2006[2]STR457; [2007]6STT196

connected with the making, preparation, display or exhibition of the advertisements in any manner--whether it be a newspaper advertisement or a

Adwise Advertising Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2001(131)ELT529(Mad); (2001)2MLJ366; 2006[2]STR375; [2007]6STT358

to a client, by an advertising agency in relation to advertisement in any manner:(e) ...'(emphasis supplied)Section 67(d) reads as under:'67. Valuation

Shakti Advertising and Others Vs. Nagar Nigam and Others

Court: Allahabad

any bye laws governing the manner and specifications of putting advertisements. The municipal authorities should not allow advertisements are put up

Zodiac Advertisers Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

that they were engaged in the business of running an advertisement agency and had not paid the Service Tax for the

Rex Advertisers Vs. Corporation of the City of Bangalore

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1986KAR2323; 1985(2)KarLJ260

be afforded to the person who has put up the advertisement hoardings. In the Instant case, no such notice has been

Outdoor Advertising Owners' Association of Ahmedabad and Anr. Vs. Stat ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR2006Guj157

his control or was committed without his connivance.(3) If any advertisement be erected, exhibited, fixed or retained contrary to the provisions

Advertising Club Vs. Central Board of Excise and Customs

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2002]121TAXMAN287(Mad)

be entirely different from the aspect of a tax on advertisements. We have referred to that judgment in details while considering

Yog Advertising and Marketing Services and Others Vs. Municipal Corpor ...

Court: Mumbai

written permission of the 2nd Respondent Municipal Commissioner before any advertisement is erected, exhibited, fixed or retained upon any land, building,