Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Administrative Tribunal - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 13 2012

K.K. Vijayan, Assistant, Central Administrative Tribunal and Others Vs ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on: Jul-13-2012

parity in matters of fixation pay as on 01-01-2006 in the pay scale of Assistants in the Central Administrative Tribunal of Ernakulam Bench. The prayer of the applicants is as under:- “(a) Declare that the applicants are entitled … the benefit of fitment as granted to Shri T.Srinivasa, Assistant of the Bangalore Bench of the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal in terms of A7 and direct the respondents to fix the applicant's pay accordingly; (b) Declare that the


Mar 21 2023

Orissa Administrative Tribunal Bar Association Vs. Union Of India

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-21-2023

Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 6805 of 2022 Orissa Administrative Tribunal Bar …Appellant Association versus Union of India & others …Respondents And With Civil Appeal No 6806 of 2022 … D. Analysis ........................................................................................................... 19 i. An overview of the proceedings arising from the abolition of the Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal and the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal 19 a. The abolition of the MPAT ......................................................................... 19 b. The abolition


Sep 11 2023

The Kerala Administrative Tribunal Ernakulam Advocates Association (Ka ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Sep-11-2023

MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 20TH BHADRA, 1945 PETITIONERS:1 THE KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ERNAKULAM ADVOCATES ASSOCIATION (KATEAA) REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, ADV.PRASANTH.S, 3RD FLOOR, KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, MERCURY CHAMBERS, SADANAM ROAD, … 1945 PETITIONERS:1 THE KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ERNAKULAM ADVOCATES ASSOCIATION (KATEAA) REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, ADV.PRASANTH.S, 3RD FLOOR, KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, MERCURY CHAMBERS, SADANAM ROAD, JOSE JUNCTION, KOCHI, KERALA, PIN - 682016 2 I.SHEELA DEVI,AGED 62 YEARS, W/O LATE


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 01 2013

***** Vs. Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Apr-01-2013

AT CHANDIGARH ***** CWP No.20122 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:01. 04.2013 ***** H.C.Gera . .Petitioner Versus Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh and others . . Respondents ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE A.K.SIKRI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN … Malaria Officer (for short ‘BCAMO’) to the post of Entomologist-cum-Parasitologist (for short ‘ECP’).order dated 8.12.2010 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh (for short ‘the Tribunal’) whereby his Original Application challenging the order dated 20.5.2010 has been dismissed and


Aug 16 2022

Deepika Singh Vs. Central Administrative Tribunal

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-16-2022

No 5308 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No 7772 of 2021) Deepika Singh …Appellant Versus Central Administrative Tribunal and Others …Respondents JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J1 Leave granted.2. This appeal arises from a judgment dated … its Chandigarh Bench in OA No 155 of 2020. By a judgment dated 29 January 2021, the Central Administrative Tribunal dismissed the OA, holding: “10. [....]. It is, thus, clear that the maternity leave can be granted to


Aug 10 2022

Mehmood Pracha Vs. Central Administrative Tribunal

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-10-2022

‘REPORTABLE’ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.892 OF2020MEHMOOD PRACHA Appellant(s) VERSUS CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL Respondent(s) JUDGMENT K. M. JOSEPH, J.(1) The appellant stands convicted by the impugned order passed by the Central … Respondent(s) JUDGMENT K. M. JOSEPH, J.(1) The appellant stands convicted by the impugned order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, under Section 14 of the Contempt of the Courts Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’


Mar 31 2009

Pinaki Chatterjee and ors. Vs. Central Administrative Tribunal and ors ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-31-2009

Reported in: AIR2009SC2623; 2009(3)AWC2282(SC); JT2009(6)SC535; (2009)IIILLJ347SC; 2009(5)SCALE168; (2009)5SCC193; 2009AIRSCW4040

at Ranchi whereby and whereunder the writ petition filed by the appellants against the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Circuit Ranchi passed in OA No. 604 of 1997 and OA No. 398 of 1998, was … working for a long time, their services were not regularized, they filed two original applications before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna, Circuit Bench, Ranchi, praying, inter alia, for a direction upon the respondents to finalise their regular absorption


Jan 21 1988

Radhakrishna Dash and ors. Vs. Administrative Tribunal, Bhubaneswar, O ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-21-1988

Reported in: AIR1988SC674; 1988(36)BLJR299; JT1988(1)SC157; 1989LabIC1201; 1988(1)SCALE121; (1988)2SCC229

of reverification, disciplinary proceedings were initiated against all the three appellants and the enquiry was entrusted to the Administrative Tribunal. Before the Tribunal evidence - oral and documentary - was led. A number of witnesses examined were also … appeals by their respective advocates was that there was no evidence to support the conclusion reached by the Administrative Tribunal that'each of them was negligent in his performance. Certain discrepancies in the evidence were pointed out in course


Nov 15 2018

Uoi and Ors. Vs.central Administrative Tribunal

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-15-2018

R.V. Sinha with Sh. A.S. Singh and Sh. Amit Sinha, Advocates. ........ Petitioners UOI & ORS. versus CENTAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ..... Respondent Through Tejaswini Chandrashekhar, Advocate, Respondent No. Sh. Sanjeev Saraswat with Ms. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE … referred to as “the Union”]. in directing the withholding of his pension, the second respondent approached the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in an application, contending that his previous 29 years’ employment which culminated in the voluntary retirement being


Feb 10 2026

Union of India Vs The Central Administrative Tribunal

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-10-2026

Central Excise, South Zone, No.26/1, Mahatma Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034. ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai Bench, City Civil Court Buildings, Second Floor, Chennai - 600 104. 2.K.Bharathi Premchand ... Respondents PRAYER:- Writ … Court was made by Mr.K.KUMARESH BABU.,J.) This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, wherein, the order of recovery had been set aside.2. Heard Mr.K.Srinivasa Murthy, learned Senior Panel Counsel for the


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial