Administrative Tribunal - Judgment Search Results
K.K. Vijayan, Assistant, Central Administrative Tribunal and Others Vs ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
parity in matters of fixation pay as on 01-01-2006 in the pay scale of Assistants in the Central Administrative Tribunal of Ernakulam Bench. The prayer of the applicants is as under:- “(a) Declare that the applicants are entitled … the benefit of fitment as granted to Shri T.Srinivasa, Assistant of the Bangalore Bench of the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal in terms of A7 and direct the respondents to fix the applicant's pay accordingly; (b) Declare that the
Orissa Administrative Tribunal Bar Association Vs. Union Of India
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-21-2023
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 6805 of 2022 Orissa Administrative Tribunal Bar …Appellant Association versus Union of India & others …Respondents And With Civil Appeal No 6806 of 2022 … D. Analysis ........................................................................................................... 19 i. An overview of the proceedings arising from the abolition of the Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal and the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal 19 a. The abolition of the MPAT ......................................................................... 19 b. The abolition
The Kerala Administrative Tribunal Ernakulam Advocates Association (Ka ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-11-2023
MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 20TH BHADRA, 1945 PETITIONERS:1 THE KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ERNAKULAM ADVOCATES ASSOCIATION (KATEAA) REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, ADV.PRASANTH.S, 3RD FLOOR, KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, MERCURY CHAMBERS, SADANAM ROAD, … 1945 PETITIONERS:1 THE KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ERNAKULAM ADVOCATES ASSOCIATION (KATEAA) REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, ADV.PRASANTH.S, 3RD FLOOR, KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, MERCURY CHAMBERS, SADANAM ROAD, JOSE JUNCTION, KOCHI, KERALA, PIN - 682016 2 I.SHEELA DEVI,AGED 62 YEARS, W/O LATE
18-section briefs on any result in this list
***** Vs. Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-01-2013
AT CHANDIGARH ***** CWP No.20122 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:01. 04.2013 ***** H.C.Gera . .Petitioner Versus Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh and others . . Respondents ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE A.K.SIKRI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN … Malaria Officer (for short ‘BCAMO’) to the post of Entomologist-cum-Parasitologist (for short ‘ECP’).order dated 8.12.2010 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh (for short ‘the Tribunal’) whereby his Original Application challenging the order dated 20.5.2010 has been dismissed and
Deepika Singh Vs. Central Administrative Tribunal
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-16-2022
No 5308 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No 7772 of 2021) Deepika Singh …Appellant Versus Central Administrative Tribunal and Others …Respondents JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J1 Leave granted.2. This appeal arises from a judgment dated … its Chandigarh Bench in OA No 155 of 2020. By a judgment dated 29 January 2021, the Central Administrative Tribunal dismissed the OA, holding: “10. [....]. It is, thus, clear that the maternity leave can be granted to
Mehmood Pracha Vs. Central Administrative Tribunal
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-10-2022
‘REPORTABLE’ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.892 OF2020MEHMOOD PRACHA Appellant(s) VERSUS CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL Respondent(s) JUDGMENT K. M. JOSEPH, J.(1) The appellant stands convicted by the impugned order passed by the Central … Respondent(s) JUDGMENT K. M. JOSEPH, J.(1) The appellant stands convicted by the impugned order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, under Section 14 of the Contempt of the Courts Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’
Pinaki Chatterjee and ors. Vs. Central Administrative Tribunal and ors ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-31-2009
Reported in: AIR2009SC2623; 2009(3)AWC2282(SC); JT2009(6)SC535; (2009)IIILLJ347SC; 2009(5)SCALE168; (2009)5SCC193; 2009AIRSCW4040
at Ranchi whereby and whereunder the writ petition filed by the appellants against the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Circuit Ranchi passed in OA No. 604 of 1997 and OA No. 398 of 1998, was … working for a long time, their services were not regularized, they filed two original applications before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna, Circuit Bench, Ranchi, praying, inter alia, for a direction upon the respondents to finalise their regular absorption
Radhakrishna Dash and ors. Vs. Administrative Tribunal, Bhubaneswar, O ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-21-1988
Reported in: AIR1988SC674; 1988(36)BLJR299; JT1988(1)SC157; 1989LabIC1201; 1988(1)SCALE121; (1988)2SCC229
of reverification, disciplinary proceedings were initiated against all the three appellants and the enquiry was entrusted to the Administrative Tribunal. Before the Tribunal evidence - oral and documentary - was led. A number of witnesses examined were also … appeals by their respective advocates was that there was no evidence to support the conclusion reached by the Administrative Tribunal that'each of them was negligent in his performance. Certain discrepancies in the evidence were pointed out in course
Uoi and Ors. Vs.central Administrative Tribunal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
R.V. Sinha with Sh. A.S. Singh and Sh. Amit Sinha, Advocates. ........ Petitioners UOI & ORS. versus CENTAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ..... Respondent Through Tejaswini Chandrashekhar, Advocate, Respondent No. Sh. Sanjeev Saraswat with Ms. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE … referred to as “the Union”]. in directing the withholding of his pension, the second respondent approached the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in an application, contending that his previous 29 years’ employment which culminated in the voluntary retirement being
Union of India Vs The Central Administrative Tribunal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-10-2026
Central Excise, South Zone, No.26/1, Mahatma Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034. ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai Bench, City Civil Court Buildings, Second Floor, Chennai - 600 104. 2.K.Bharathi Premchand ... Respondents PRAYER:- Writ … Court was made by Mr.K.KUMARESH BABU.,J.) This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, wherein, the order of recovery had been set aside.2. Heard Mr.K.Srinivasa Murthy, learned Senior Panel Counsel for the
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free