Adjudicate - Judgment Search Results

Adjudicating Officer Securities and Exchange Board of India Vs. Bhaves ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

is clarified that the power of an adjudicating officer to adjudge the quantum of penalty under sections 15A to 15E, clauses

Bharat Shantilal Thakkar Vs. the Adjudicating Officer Securities and E ...

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

of that section shall so apply. As observed by the adjudicating officer off market transfers in the present case are covered

Sri. Neelkantha Rathod Vs. The Adjudicating Authority

Court: Karnataka

of Section 8. In other words, the special court would adjudicate as to whether the property which has been provisionally attached

Radheshyam Chiranjilal Goenka Vs. Adjudicating Officer,

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

arbitration does not in any way disable the Respondent to adjudicate the matter under the Act.12. One of the conditions for

M/S. Cabot International Capital Vs. Adjudicating Officer and

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

therein, for each such failure.19. Section 15I empowers SEBI to adjudicate. Said section 15(I) reads as under: "15 I (1) For

Zee Telefilms Ltd. Vs. Adjudicating and Enquiry Officer,

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in: (2003)42SCL484SAT

the company.22. In this context the findings recorded by the Adjudicating Officer is to be noted. Having recorded the background of

Zee Telefilms Ltd. Vs. the Adjudicating and Enquiry

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in: (2003)2CompLJ282SAT

statutory obligation is a matter of discretion left to the Adjudicating Officer and that discretion has to be exercised judicially and

Mathew Easow Vs. the Adjudicating Officer,

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

opposite advice to the market. Since Mathew, according to the adjudicating officer, acted contrary to his own recommendations when he sold

Saroj and Co. Proprietor Sanjay Agrawal Vs. the Adjudicating Officer

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

senior counsel for the Board defended the order of the adjudicating officer observing that a look at the entire picture of

Sanjay Kumar Gupta Vs. Adjudicating Officer,

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in: (2006)65SCL410SAT

in the said section itself and the offence cannot be adjudicated by the Adjudicating Officer under section 15 I. (2) The