Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Actually Allowed - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 27 2008

Savithri A.N. Vs. Authority Under the Kerala Payment of Subsistence Al ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: May-27-2008

Reported in: [2008(118)FLR938]; 2008(2)KLJ541

1st respondent directed payment of subsistence allowance calculated on the basis of the wages which the workman was actually drawing at the time of suspension without taking into account the increase in wages with retrospective effect as … carry interest @ 12% per annum from the date when the subsistence allowance became due.The writ petition is allowed as above. - - 1. An interesting question as to the interpretation of the provisions of the Kerala


Feb 06 2012

Officer Also While Allowing the Vs. Unknown

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-06-2012

Recovery Officer dated 22.2.2010, Official Liquidator filed an appeal before the Presiding Officer, DRT which appeal was partially allowed by order dated 11.6.2010 and the order passed by Recovery officer was modified to the extent that Official


May 10 2013

Whether Reporters of Local Papers May Be Allowed to See the Vs. Promil ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-10-2013

KUMAR SANGHI. Present : Mr.G.I.Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.”2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported


18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 10 2013

Whether Reporters of Local Papers May Be Allowed to See the Vs. State ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-10-2013

KUMAR SANGHI. Present : Mr.G.S.Punia, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.”2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported


May 06 2013

Whether Reporters of Local Papers May Be Allowed to See the Vs. Harkir ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-06-2013

KUMAR SANGHI. Present : Mr.J.S.Sathi, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.”2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported


May 10 2013

Whether Reporters of Local Papers May Be Allowed to See the Vs. Harish ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-10-2013

Present : Mr.Puran Singh Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.”2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported


May 10 2013

Whether Reporters of Local Papers May Be Allowed to See the Vs. the Pe ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-10-2013

has been reinstated with continuity of service, he shall be deemed to have served the appellant- Corporation though actually and factually he may not have worked during that period. The deeming fixation in such like situation will … SANGHI. Present : Mr.Anupam Singla, Advocate, for the appellants. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.”2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported


May 06 2013

Whether Reporters of Local Papers May Be Allowed to See the Vs. Parmin ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-06-2013

SANGHI. Present : Mr.Sanjay K. Guevera, Advocate, for the petitioneRs.-.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.”2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported


Feb 01 2013

Whether Reporters of Local Papers May Be Allowed to See the Vs. Jagjit ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-01-2013

Present : Mr.Jasbir Singh Chahal, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.”2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported


Feb 01 2013

Whether Reporters of Local Papers May Be Allowed to See the Vs. Hitesh ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-01-2013

MR.JUSTICE R.P.NAGRATH. Present : Mr.G.I.Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.”2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial