Activities - Judgment Search Results
Gomzi Active Vs. Reebok India Co. and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-02-2007
Reported in: 2007(1)AWC771(SC); JT2007(3)SC216; LC2007(1)360; 2007(34)PTC161(SC); 2007(2)SCALE532; (2007)10SCC632; 2007(1)LC0193(SC)
Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted.2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment rendered by a learned Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court partially allowing the appeal filed by the respondent and directing the trial...
M/S. Active Travels, vs the Regional Transport Officer
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-27-2024
JUDGMENT DATED 14.11.2018 IN WP(C) NO.36876 OF 2018 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA APPELLANT/WRIT PETITIONER IN WPC: M/S. ACTIVE TRAVELS, KARUVAMBRAM, MANJERI, MALAPPURAM REPRESENTED BY THE PROPRIETOR N.K. MOIDEENKUTTY. BY ADV K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN WPC:1 THE
Net Pro Active Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Service Tax
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Mar-23-2006
Reported in: (2007)11STT23
1. The appellants are required to pre-deposit Service Tax of Rs. 18,99,196/- for the year 2000-2001 and another amount of Rs. 10,04,517/- for the year 2001-2002. The show cause notice is based on the income-tax returns....
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Net Pro Active Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of S.T.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Jul-18-2006
and the matter is required to be remanded for de novo consideration. The appellants were carrying on certain activities under the category of Consulting Engineer Services. The Revenue has proceeded to levy service tax on the ground
Net-pro-active Services (P) Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Service Tax
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Jun-18-2007
Reported in: (2008)12STT79
their unit functioning at No 10, Level 8, Innovator, Whitefield Road, Bangalore 560066 does not have any business activity. Learned advocate referred to the CA's Certificate which is produced today. It certifies that the unit on which
Active International Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2007
1. The applicant filed this application for waiver of pre-deposit of amount of Service Tax of Rs. 39,841/- and penalties. The demand is for the period prior to 31-3-2005 in respect of service provided by an...
Active Finstock (P.) Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Jan-07-2008
Reported in: (2008)83SCL154SAT
1. The appellant before us is a stock broker registered with the Securities and Exchange Board of India ('the Board'). Its premises were inspected by a team of inspectors appointed by the Board and the period...
Globe Active Technologies Ltd. Vs. Cc
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-18-2002
Reported in: (2002)(104)LC443Tri(Mum.)bai
1. In the order impugned in this appeal, the Commissioner has held that the goods that the appellant imported constituted complete air conditioner for a bus and accordingly classifiable under Chapter 84.14 of the Tariff, and...
Peters Vs. Active Mfg. Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-13-1889
Peters v. Active Mfg. Co. - 130 U.S. 626 (1889) U.S. Supreme Court Peters v. Active Mfg. Co., 130 U.S. 626
Western Vs. Active Mfg. Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-05-1889
Western v. Active Mfg. Co. - 129 U.S. 530 (1889) U.S. Supreme Court Western v. Active Mfg. Co., 129 U.S. 530
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free