Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Active Use - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 02 2007

Gomzi Active Vs. Reebok India Co. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-02-2007

Reported in: 2007(1)AWC771(SC); JT2007(3)SC216; LC2007(1)360; 2007(34)PTC161(SC); 2007(2)SCALE532; (2007)10SCC632; 2007(1)LC0193(SC)

am' and for payment of damages and for rendition of accounts. The controversy involved was pertaining to the use of the trade slogan 'I am what I am'. Respondents had filed the appeal challenging the grant of


Feb 27 2024

M/S. Active Travels, vs the Regional Transport Officer

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Feb-27-2024

JUDGMENT DATED 14.11.2018 IN WP(C) NO.36876 OF 2018 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA APPELLANT/WRIT PETITIONER IN WPC: M/S. ACTIVE TRAVELS, KARUVAMBRAM, MANJERI, MALAPPURAM REPRESENTED BY THE PROPRIETOR N.K. MOIDEENKUTTY. BY ADV K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN WPC:1 THE


Mar 23 2006

Net Pro Active Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Service Tax

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Mar-23-2006

Reported in: (2007)11STT23

1. The appellants are required to pre-deposit Service Tax of Rs. 18,99,196/- for the year 2000-2001 and another amount of Rs. 10,04,517/- for the year 2001-2002. The show cause notice is based on the income-tax returns....


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 18 2006

Net Pro Active Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of S.T.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Jul-18-2006

Matched in: Parties Net Pro Active Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of S.T.


Jun 18 2007

Net-pro-active Services (P) Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Service Tax

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Jun-18-2007

Reported in: (2008)12STT79

their unit functioning at No 10, Level 8, Innovator, Whitefield Road, Bangalore 560066 does not have any business activity. Learned advocate referred to the CA's Certificate which is produced today. It certifies that the unit on which


Aug 29 2007

Active International Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-29-2007

Matched in: Parties Active International Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.


Jan 07 2008

Active Finstock (P.) Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Jan-07-2008

Reported in: (2008)83SCL154SAT

23-8-2002 as unused brokerage earned by the appellant as a stock broker. This being so, the appellant obviously used its own money to pay to the aforesaid Corporation for its proprietary trades.Admittedly, the unused brokerage lying in


May 18 2002

Globe Active Technologies Ltd. Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-18-2002

Reported in: (2002)(104)LC443Tri(Mum.)bai

wiring have the essential character of a complete air conditioner. They are obviously intended to be for that use and cannot be put to any other use.


May 13 1889

Peters Vs. Active Mfg. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-13-1889

Peters v. Active Mfg. Co. - 130 U.S. 626 (1889) U.S. Supreme Court Peters v. Active Mfg. Co., 130 U.S. 626 … "improvement in dies for making dash frames." A dash frame is made of metal, and is to be used in constructing a dash board for a carriage or other vehicle. The defenses set up in the answer


Mar 05 1889

Western Vs. Active Mfg. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-05-1889

Western v. Active Mfg. Co. - 129 U.S. 530 (1889) U.S. Supreme Court Western v. Active Mfg. Co., 129 U.S. 530 … stops, as and for the purposes explained," cover improvements which are merely adaptations of old devices to new uses, not involving invention. Claim 3 of the patent, namely, "3. A sheath composed of two grooved bars A


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial