Active Use - Judgment Search Results
Gomzi Active Vs. Reebok India Co. and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-02-2007
Reported in: 2007(1)AWC771(SC); JT2007(3)SC216; LC2007(1)360; 2007(34)PTC161(SC); 2007(2)SCALE532; (2007)10SCC632; 2007(1)LC0193(SC)
am' and for payment of damages and for rendition of accounts. The controversy involved was pertaining to the use of the trade slogan 'I am what I am'. Respondents had filed the appeal challenging the grant of
M/S. Active Travels, vs the Regional Transport Officer
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-27-2024
JUDGMENT DATED 14.11.2018 IN WP(C) NO.36876 OF 2018 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA APPELLANT/WRIT PETITIONER IN WPC: M/S. ACTIVE TRAVELS, KARUVAMBRAM, MANJERI, MALAPPURAM REPRESENTED BY THE PROPRIETOR N.K. MOIDEENKUTTY. BY ADV K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN WPC:1 THE
Net Pro Active Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Service Tax
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Mar-23-2006
Reported in: (2007)11STT23
1. The appellants are required to pre-deposit Service Tax of Rs. 18,99,196/- for the year 2000-2001 and another amount of Rs. 10,04,517/- for the year 2001-2002. The show cause notice is based on the income-tax returns....
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Net Pro Active Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of S.T.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Jul-18-2006
Matched in: Parties Net Pro Active Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of S.T.
Net-pro-active Services (P) Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Service Tax
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Jun-18-2007
Reported in: (2008)12STT79
their unit functioning at No 10, Level 8, Innovator, Whitefield Road, Bangalore 560066 does not have any business activity. Learned advocate referred to the CA's Certificate which is produced today. It certifies that the unit on which
Active International Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2007
Matched in: Parties Active International Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Active Finstock (P.) Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Jan-07-2008
Reported in: (2008)83SCL154SAT
23-8-2002 as unused brokerage earned by the appellant as a stock broker. This being so, the appellant obviously used its own money to pay to the aforesaid Corporation for its proprietary trades.Admittedly, the unused brokerage lying in
Globe Active Technologies Ltd. Vs. Cc
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-18-2002
Reported in: (2002)(104)LC443Tri(Mum.)bai
wiring have the essential character of a complete air conditioner. They are obviously intended to be for that use and cannot be put to any other use.
Peters Vs. Active Mfg. Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-13-1889
Peters v. Active Mfg. Co. - 130 U.S. 626 (1889) U.S. Supreme Court Peters v. Active Mfg. Co., 130 U.S. 626 … "improvement in dies for making dash frames." A dash frame is made of metal, and is to be used in constructing a dash board for a carriage or other vehicle. The defenses set up in the answer
Western Vs. Active Mfg. Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-05-1889
Western v. Active Mfg. Co. - 129 U.S. 530 (1889) U.S. Supreme Court Western v. Active Mfg. Co., 129 U.S. 530 … stops, as and for the purposes explained," cover improvements which are merely adaptations of old devices to new uses, not involving invention. Claim 3 of the patent, namely, "3. A sheath composed of two grooved bars A
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free