Act - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: act Page 1 of about 1,406 results (0.040 seconds)Act Shipping Limited Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Reported in: (2007)8STT344
1. After hearing both sides in this application for waiver & stay of service tax of Rs. 97,000/- credit which...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTopa Mallah ? Jhora Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
his statement. He stated that he did not see the actual assault and he also stated that he has differences with
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndian Stamp Act and Vs. Ibrahim Ishak
Court: Kolkata
Reported in: 51Ind.Cas.221
Sub-clause (i) of the First Schedule of the Indian Stamp Act, that is to say, 'the lease purports to be for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSergeant (Acting Unpaid J.W.O) B.M. sharma (service No.700097 'R') CLK ...
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi
the final order contending that on 8/7/2010 the case was actually adjourned to 13/7/2010 and on that day the case was
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Act Shipping Ltd and Others Vs. Cc.Kandla
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad
findings, and the technical evidence of equivalence of certain grades actually supplied by the petitioner during the relevant period to the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Act Xviii of 1869 and of the Uncovenanted Service Bank (Limited ...
Court: Kolkata
Reported in: (1879)ILR4Cal830
not a 'receipt or discharge' within the meaning of the Act, because it was not given to the party who paid
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Act I of 1879; in Re: Reference from the Board of Revenue Under ...
Court: Kolkata
Reported in: (1892)ILR19Cal499
it does not come within Section 25 of the Stamp Act. We have not the means of ascertaining its value. That
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndian Companies Act and the Company Vs. the Maharaja Bahadur Sir Rame ...
Court: Kolkata
Reported in: 58Ind.Cas.561
within the meaning of Section 163(1) of the Indian Companies Act. Reliance was placed upon the judgment of Sir G. Jessel,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNegotiable Instruments Act,1881 Be Ordered to Run Concurrently. Vs. Un ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
case in convictions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and ordered sentences in two cases to run concurrently.
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAcquisition Act 1894 (here-in-after referred to as 'The Act'), Vs. Sub ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
accuracy of this order Chandigarh CWP No.3178 of 2014 [2].Acquisition Act, 1894, (here-in-after referred to as 'the Act').respectively, on the premise
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>