Accumulation - Judgment Search Results
Orion Accumulators Private Limited vs Moodadi Grama Panchayath
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-12-2024
FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 22ND POUSHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 28964 OF 2015 PETITIONER: ORION ACCUMULATORS PRIVATE LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR.M.P.BABU, SIDCO INDUSTRIAL PARK, KOYILANDY TALUK, CALICUT-673 001. BY ADV SRI.NIRMAL.
Orion Accumulators Private Limited vs the Convener, Single Window Clea ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-05-2024
FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 15TH POUSHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 33703 OF 2015 PETITIONER: ORION ACCUMULATORS PRIVATE LIMITED AGED 52 YEARS REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR.M.P.BABU, SIDCO INDUSTRIAL PARK, KOYILANDY TALUK, CALICUT-673 001.
Sai Accumulator Industries Sangamner, Through its Partner, Kacheshvar ...
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Apr-22-2016
1. This is an Appeal against acquittal of Respondent original accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ("Act" in brief). 2. Facts in brief may be stated as follows: (A). The Appellant original...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Accumulator Fabrics Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Mar-19-1991
Reported in: (1991)(55)ELT345Tri(Chennai)
1. The appeal is directed against the order of the Collector of Customs and Central Excise (Appeals), Madras dated 29-1-1988 and the short question that arises for our consideration in the appeal is whether the appellant...
United Accumulators Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs and Central
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-09-1994
Reported in: (1994)(53)LC125Tri(Mum.)bai
1. For hearing the applicants' appeal on merits, they are required to deposit a sum of Rs. 5,05,551 towards duty and a penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs, vide order in original No. 6/C/C. Ex. Goa/93 dated...
Manash Ranjan Chakravarty Vs. Tropical Accumulators Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-03-1955
Reported in: AIR1957Cal135,60CWN590
R.P. Mookerjee, J.1. The plaintiff respondent Company brought a suit in the 4th Court of the Subordinate Judge at Alipore for a declaration that the Trade Mark 'Sakti' is being used and exploited by the plaintiff...
Free India Dry Accumulators Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-01-1996
Reported in: 1999(107)ELT290(SC); JT1998(9)SC238; (1998)8SCC416
ORDER1. The appellants entered into contracts with the South-Eastern Railways for supply of electric storage batteries. The batteries were to be manufactured with old containers which were to be supplied by the Railways. It was agreed...
Union of India Vs. Free India Dry Accumulators Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-1993
Reported in: 1993(1)ARBLR418(Delhi); 50(1993)DLT375; 1993(25)DRJ354; 1993RLR260
C.M. Nayar, J. (1) This is a petition under Section 14 of the Arbitration Act, for directing respondent no.2 to file the Award along with the arbitration proceedings in this Court. Notice was issued to respondent...
Free India Dry Accumulators Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-17-1977
Reported in: 1980(6)ELT168(Cal)
ORDERT.K. Basu, J.1. The facts involved in the present application lie within a very narrow compass. The petitioners are the manufacturers of electric storage batteries which are supplied to the Railways and are known as Train...
Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Free India Dry Accumulators Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-12-1982
Reported in: 1983(12)ELT733(Cal)
learned Judge made absolute the Rule Nisi issued on the application of the respondent company, Free India Dry Accumulators Ltd., under Article 226 of the Constitution.2. The question that is involved in this appeal relates to the
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free