Accordingly V Swaminathan - Judgment Search Results

V.Swaminathan Vs The Joint Commissioner

Court: Chennai

law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. 04.02.2026 Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No TSGTo … BEFORE THE MADURAI BENGH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.(MD)No.2799 of 2026 V.Swaminathan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Joint Commissioner, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District. 2.The Assistant Commissioner, 3.The Tahsildar, 4.The Superintendent of Police,

V.Swaminathan Vs The Managing Director

Court: Chennai

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.02.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI V.Swaminathan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Managing Director, State Express Transport Corporation Ltd, Chennai 600 002. 2.The Administrator, Tamil Nadu

V.Swaminathan Vs The Managing Director

Court: Chennai

was considered by the fourth respondent and necessary and certain clarifications were sought for from the first respondent. Accordingly, the petitioner was intimated about the same through the impugned letter dated 02.01.2026. As no further steps have … BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 17/03/2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR V.Swaminathan ... Petitioner Vs1. The Managing Director, Head Office, Chepauk, Chennai.2. The Chief Engineer (General), Ganesh Nagar, Melur Road,

M.V. Swaminathan Vs. The State Represented by Inspector of Police SPE: ...

Court: Chennai

Matched in: Parties M.V. Swaminathan Vs. The State Represented by Inspector of Police SPE:CBI:ACB, Chennai

Mrs. E.V. Swaminathan Vs. K.M.M.A. Industries and Roadways Private Ltd ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1993]76CompCas1(Mad)

petitioner has also been designated as the managing director of the company. According to the petitioner, her husband, Swaminathan, and the second respondent's husband, David, who are brothers have acquired all the shares from the members of … R.P. David, the husband pf the second respondent, has been ateending to the affairs of the company in view of the close relationship and the confidence reposed by the petitioner in him. The registeres, books and other

A.P. State Federation of Coop. Spinning Mills Ltd. and anr. Vs. P.V. S ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2001(89)FLR332]; JT2001(3)SC530; (2001)ILLJ1341SC; (2001)10SCC83

paid to him while passing the order of termination in lieu of notice. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. - [G.B. Pattanaik and; B.N. Agrawal, JJ.] - Service Law - Termination of service - Termination simpliciter or … press the question of non-maintainability of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution against the appellant in view of the several bye-laws and regulations of the appellant Society. He however seriously challenged the conclusion of the

Government of India Represented by the Secretary Vs. K.V. Swaminathan

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996(8)SCALE698; (1997)10SCC190; [1996]Supp8SCR737

from the amount payable in every month, instead of asking him to refund the amount.4. The appeal is accordingly allowed. No costs. Constitution - pension - benefit of doubt was given to respondent and pension was granted … The controversy is no longer res Integra. This Court had considered the entire controversy in Union of India v. M.R. Chelliah Thevar C.A. No. 7762/96 decided on April 30,1996 and held thus:Heard counsel for both sides. On

Dhanalakshmi vs S.V.Swaminathan(Died)

Court: Chennai

THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATE : 05.02.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR and Dhanalakshmi : Appellant Vs. S.V.Swaminathan (died) 1.R.Selvi 2.M.Rohini Meena (died) 3.Pushpam 4.Rathinam Ammal 5.S.Sandeep 6.S.Saveetha : Respondents Prayer : Second Appeal filed

The Executive Officer, Kadathur Town Panchayat Vs. V. Swaminathan,

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2004(3)CTC270; (2004)2MLJ708

the impugned order.15. For the foregoing reasons, we do not see any merit in the above appeals and accordingly, they are dismissed, however, there will be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected WAMPs are also dismissed. … set out hereunder:-The writ petitioners and their ancestors were in occupation of small pieces of land in Kadathur Village, Pappi Reddi Patti Taluk, Dharmapuri District for more than 40 years and the said lands are classified as

A.Ramakrishnan Vs. P.V.Swaminathan

Court: Kerala

revision petitioner pleaded not guilty, he was sent for trial. After trial, the revision petitioner was found guilty. Accordingly, he was convicted and sentenced to rigours imprisonment for six months with direction to pay Rs.60,000/- as compensation … FAST TRACK NO.II, PALAKKAD ST.1257/1998 of J.M.F.C.-I,PALAKKAD REVISION PETITIONER(S)/APPELLANT/ACCUSED:: ----------------------------------------- A. RAMAKRISHNAN, NARAYANALAYAM, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD. BY ADVS.SRI.SAJAN VARGHEESE SRI.JEBY JACOB RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:: --------------------------------------- 1. P.V. SWAMINATHAQN, S/O. VELAYUDHAN EZHUTHACHAN, PALAKKODU VEEDU, CHENNAMGAD POST, PALAKKAD.2. STATE OF KERALA,