Accord - Judgment Search Results
Dynasty Developers Private Limited, a Company Incorporated and Existin ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-10-2008
Reported in: AIR2008Mad119; 2008(2)ARBLR249(Madras); 2008(1)CTC580; (2008)2MLJ1
by arbitration. Disputes arose between the parties and a reference has been made to the arbitral tribunal in accordance with the agreement.3. Apprehending that the respondents would act contrary to the Share Purchase Agreement and either deal
Accord Alloys Limited Vs. Pee Ell Alloys and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2008
Reported in: III(2008)BC497; 150(2008)DLT564
per Metric Tonne on account of increase in the chrome content in the said goods. The purchase order, according to the learned Counsel for the plaintiff, was placed on 03.01.2008 and the same was confirmed by the
Accord Alloys Limited Vs. Asia Minerals Ltd. and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2010
is a Hong Kong registered private company, and the second defendant is the LCIA. The suit mentions that Accord Alloys entered into a contract, evidenced by e-mails and communications dated 24.04.2007, 02.05.2007, 03.05.2007 and 05.05.2007 for supply
18-section briefs on any result in this list
“accordingly the Writ Petition Is Allowed and Vs. V.K. Gupta and ors ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-29-2012
for a period not less than 21 years on regular basis. The retiral benefits of the petitioner be accordingly revised and released before the next date of hearing. List on 24.09.2012.” The respondents filed LPA No.1101 of
According to Respondent No.1 the Fixation of Seniority in the Select P ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-13-2014
direct recruitment and promotion through the process of selection respectively from eligible Group-D category of staff. Respondent No.1 accordingly participated in the process of such selection, a circular was having been issued on 25.09.2002 against the promotion
“10. According to the Provisions of Section 12 of Punjab Vs. the Col ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-26-2014
the aforesaid revenue entries, the fiRs.appellate Court proceeded to allow the appeal by holding as follows: - “10. According to the provisions of Section 12 of Punjab Village Common Lands Act, 1961, the arrears of rent are
“accordingly This Writ Petition Is Allowed. Respondents Are Vs. Stat ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-25-2014
CWP No.12621 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.12621 of 2011 Date of Decision:25.07.2014 Dalip Singh ..Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others ..Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE...
According to the Petitioner the Aforementioned Vs. Pawan Kumar .....Pe ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-19-2014
whereby prayer made by him for one more opportunity to cross-examine PW2, PW3 and PW10 has been declined. According to the petitioner, the aforementioned three witnesses were examined by the prosecution. Subsequent thereto, the petitioner obtained certified/attested
Accord Finance and Properties Ltd., Rep.by its Director R. Ramakrishna ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-23-2016
is forwarded to the Court, which passed the decree and the Court is directed to pass order in accordance with the provisions of Section 144 of the Code of Civil Procedure and other applicable principles. 6. In
Accord Finance and Properties (Pvt) Ltd. Vs. Besser Concrete Systems L ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
whole of the building, Hari Bhawan, except one room in dispute is in possession of the Corporation. We accordingly suspend the operation of the Order dated August 6, 1982 directing the appellants to hand over the possession
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free