A V D - Judgment Search Results

V.D.Mathew vs John V.D.*

Court: Kerala

CRL.A.NO. 250/2001 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT,KOTTAYAM IN C.C.NO.877/1999 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS - I,KANJIRAPPALLY REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/COMPLAINANT: V.D.MATHEW AGE 65 S/O. DEVASIA, MAKAYIL HOUSE MATTAKKARA P.O, KOTTAYAM BY ADV SRI.LIJI.J.VADAKEDOM RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS ACCUSED & STATE: 1 JOHN

D.V.D' Monte Vs. N. Venkatesh and Ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2006)4MLJ342

the Contractor, but some portion was not demolished since the same was under the lock and seal in view of order of attachment issued by Courts at the instance of one B.K. Sagar of Delhi. The plaintiffs … P.K. Misra, J.1. O.S.A. No. 401 of 2002 has been filed by the first defendant in C.S. No. 180 of 1990 against the part of the decree directing him to pay a sum

V.D.Bhanot Vs. Savita Bhanot

Court: Supreme Court of India

the Respondent filed a petition before the Magistrate under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, hereinafter referred to as the "PWD Act", seeking various reliefs. By his order dated 8th December, … ALTAMAS KABIR, J. 1. The Special Leave Petition is directed against the judgment and order dated 22nd March, 2010, passed by the Delhi High Court in Cr.M.C.No.3959 of

V.D. Chaudhary Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2005SC3270; 2005CriLJ3753; JT2005(8)SC101; (2005)12SCC304

even if allegations made in the FIR and other papers are accepted to be true on its face value, offence under Section 304A and 338 IPC would appear against the accused applicant in Case Crime No. 2072/2002 … High Court granting bail to respondent No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the 'accused').3. Background facts sans unnecessary details are as follows:On 5.2.2000 complainant lodged the First Information Report. It was stated therein that when he and

Roy V.D. Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2001(1)ALD(Cri)71; 2001ALLMR(Cri)163(SC); 2001(1)BLJR221; 2001CriLJ165; 2000(72)ECC457; 2001(1)KLT86(SC); 2000(7)SCALE446; (2000)8SCC590; [2000]Supp4SCR539; 2001(1)LC212(SC

Devikulam, however, filed a fresh charge sheet against the appellant in Crime No. 56 of 1990 for the very same offence on May 17, 1993. The case was committed to the court of the Additional Sessions Judge, … Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.1. Leave to appeal is granted2. This appeal is directed against the order dated June 4, 1998 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam dismissing Crl.

V.D. Barot Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (2002)4GLR3734; (2002)10SCC668

S. Rajendra Babu and; Shivaraj V. Patil, JJ.1. Leave granted.2. The order under challenge pertains to discharge of the appellant from the post of … S. Rajendra Babu and; Shivaraj V. Patil, JJ.1. Leave granted.2. The order under challenge pertains to discharge of the appellant from the post of probationary Police Sub-Inspector. The appellant had been prosecuted for offences punishable

Capt. B.V. D'Souza Vs. Antonio Fausto Fernandes

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1989SC1816; JT1989(3)SC265; 1989(2)SCALE197; (1989)3SCC574; [1989]3SCR626; 1989(2)LC605(SC)

alleging that he has been in occupation of the building as a licensee and has illegally refused to vacate in spite of service of notice. The appellant's defence is that he is a tenant protected by the … Lalit Mohan Sharma, J.1. The only point involved in this appeal is whether the document (Ext. 20) executed by the parties at the time the appellant was inducted in the disputed premises is

V.D. Trivedi Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1993)2SCC55

been proved. Respondent's counsel has suggested to us that since this has ultimately to go to the Central Vigilance Commission and the final order is to be made by them we should not on the basis of … Ranganath Misra, C.J.,; M.H. Kania; P.B. Sawant, JJ.1. Special leave granted.2. This Court on September 19, 1990 had directed the respondent to produce the Inquiry Report. The Inquiry Report dated May 31, 1990 submitted by Dr P.K.

V.D. Jhangan Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1966SC1762; [1966]3SCR736; 1966 Cri LJ 1357

On the same date the appellant called one Ram Lal Kapoor who was the legal adviser of New Victoria Mills Ltd. at his house. The appellant showed him the letter of the District Magistrate and on the … with s. 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act by special Judge, Anti-Corruption, Lucknow who by his judgment dated January 8, 1962 convicted the appellant and sentenced him to three years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of

V.D. Dhanwatey Vs. the Commissioner of Income Tax, M.P. Nagpur

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1968SC682; [1968]68ITR365(SC); [1968]2SCR62

(7) provided that general management and supervision of the partnership business shall be in the hands of Shri V. D. Dhanwatey. Clause (8) stated that Shri M. D. Dhanwatey shall be the manager in charge of the works … Shri M. D. Dhanwatey shall be the manager in charge of the works and both he and Shri V. D. Dhanwatey shall have power to make contracts and arrange terms with constituents or customers. Clause (10) empowered three