A 3 V The - Judgment Search Results
Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat-iii Vs. Shilaben Kanchanlal RanA. ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Nov-09-1979
Reported in: (1980)15CTR(Guj)25; [1980]124ITR420(Guj)
appeals at the instance of the CIT, Gujarat-III, the common order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal dated June 30, 1976, invalidating the acquisition of immovable property being shops, bearing Nos. 1 to 5 on the ground floor … the competent authority the apparent consideration stated in the deed of conveyance was less than the fair market value, he initiated the acquisition proceedings by a notice on May 18, 1974, which was published in the Central
G. Madhukar Reddy Vs. Canara Bank, Having Its Office at 3-5-168-1234, ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Nov-24-2011
of bank officials lodged a complaint with Narayanaguda Police and a case was registered vide Crime No.541/2008 on 31.12.08. The complainant came to know that the police sent cheques as well as requisition letter to the Forensic … retail pharmacy being run under the name and style of âMedplus. The complainant opened an account with opp.party vide S.B.Account no.0649101040972 and he was issued a Cheque Book facility and he has been personally operating the bank
Spfl Securities Ltd. Vs. Dy Cit, Circle 3(5), New Delhi
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2005
Reported in: (2006)6SOT562(Delhi)
This is an appeal by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) dated 31-1-2002 pertaining to assessment year 1998-99.Following grounds of appeal have been preferred - "1. That the learned Commissioner (Appeals) … in 192 ITR 365 and section 73. The finding of the Commissioner (Appeals) being contrary to law be vacated." In brief, the facts are that the assessee is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free