9 3 - Judgment Search Results
S.H.A.M.K. International P.Ltd and Another Vs. Ito -9(3)(1) and Anothe ...
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-31-2014
of ad hoc disallowances have been confirmed by the Tribunal and hence the deletion of penalties are justified. 3. Having heard both the sides and perused the material on record, it is pertinent to note that for
Devichand Kothari (HUF) Vs. Income-tax Officer, Ward No. 9 (3), Bangal ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-05-2015
and by furnishing the details/copy of the statement based on which the impugned assessment order has been passed. 9. In the result, this writ petition is allowed. The impugned order is quashed. The matter is remitted for … 1. Petitioner is calling in question assessment order dated 30.06.2014 passed by the respondent - Income Tax Officer exercising powers under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 of
Arvind Motasha Vs. Asstt. Cit, Range 9(3)
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-12-2006
Bonds (Immunities and Exemptions) Act, 1991. As noted in paragraph 4 of the CBDT Circular No. 611, dated 30-9-1991 (191 ITR (Statute) 319), "section 4 of the Act further provides that any remittance of the nature referred
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free