9 1 - Judgment Search Results

Grid Corporation of Orissa Ltd. and ors.Vs. Eastern Metals and Ferro A ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

tariffs issued by the State Government and in force on 1st April 1996.9.2 The authority granted in clause 9.1 expires with the expiration of this license."The "interim tariffs in force as on 1.4.1996 issued by the state

Commissioner of Income Tax, Calcutta Vs. T.i. and M. Sales Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1987SC1234; (1987)2CompLJ108(SC); (1987)61CTR(SC)273; [1987]166ITR93(SC); JT1987(2)SC272; 1987(1)SCALE771; (1987)3SCC132; [1987]2SCR883; 1987(2)UJ31(SC)

163(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act of 1961 for the purpose of giving rise to the liability under Section 9(1) of the Act would depend upon a set of facts arising in a particular case. [889F-G]3. The, order … section 163(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act of 1961 for the purpose of giving rise to liability under section 9(1) of the Act would depend upon a set of facts arising in a particular case. The High Court,

Subhash Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

Section 12(2) of the Bihar Control' of Crimes Act, 1981 (Annexure-3) as well as its confirmation order dated 9.1.2007 issued under the signature of Deputy Secretary, Government of Bihar (Annexure-1) and has also prayed for its quashing.2.

Sverdrup Civil Inc. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(1)ALD419

disputes by arbitration, which is an adequate and efficacious alternative remedy. It may be noted here, that Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, provides for issuing orders for interim injunction or interim protection etc., … (a) of the agreement issued a termination notice to the Company by his letter No. 31798/WB/CSC/ Phase-III/98, dated 19-4-2001 to explain within 30 days from the date of receipt of the said notice as to why the

Bhim Singh Vs. Kan Singh

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: II(2004)BC475; 2004CriLJ4306; RLW2004(1)Raj432; 2004(1)WLC526

Garg, J. 1. This criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the complainant petitioner with the prayer … Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the complainant petitioner with the prayer that the impugned order dated 9.10.2002 passed by the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nathdwara Distt. Rajsamand in criminal case No. 115/2001 by which

ilam Singh Vs. Vith Addl. District Judge, Muzaffarnagar and Others

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1991All34

to have filed aCivil Original Suit No. 140 of 1980 for perrformance of a contract for sale on 9-1-1986and in the alternative had prayed for refund ofthe consideration amount, which wasRs. SOOO/-. The suit was decreed on

Modern Food Industries (India) Ltd. Vs. M.D. Juvekar

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1988)1GLR481; (1988)IILLJ534Guj

Ahmadi, J. 1. The first appellant, Modern Food Industries (India) Ltd., also known as Modern Bakeries (India) Ltd., a Government Company … Regulation No. 2.18 of the Staff Regulations of the Company with immediate effect. Shri Juvekar may collect his 90 day's pay in lieu of notice period, as provided under the said staff Regulation from the General Manager,

A.M.A. Sp. Narayanan Chettiar Vs. Controller of Estate Duty

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1985]156ITR758(Mad)

of the sum of Rs. 92,243 in the principal value of the estate of the deceased under section 9(1) read with section 27 and Explanation 2 to section 2(15) of Estate Duty Act, 1953, is proper and … share will be made good at the time of the final partition. 14. Therefore, the application of section 9(1) read with section 27 and Explanation 2 to section 2(15) of the Act in this case are legally

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. J.B. Bottling Company Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 14(1978)DLT1; ILR1978Delhi129

in the manufacture, import or sale of articles offood for purposes of the proviso to sub-section (1) ofsection 9 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act,1954'.(2) Lala Bishambar Dayal, learned counsel for the appellant inthe criminal appeal

A.K.L. Labbai Thambi Maraicar Vs. Government of India, Enforcement Dir ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1983Mad102

the Assistant Director of Enforcement holding the appellant guilty of contravention of S. 5 (1) (aa) and S. 9(1)(b) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Acts, 1947 and 1973 respectively and levying a penalty of an aggregate sum … S. 5 (1) (aa) of the 1947 Act for having received a sum of Rs. 2000 and S. 9(1)(b) of the 1973 Act for having received the two payments amounting to Rs. 3000 and that the receipt