8 3 - Judgment Search Results

Ramkrishna Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. the Ito 8(3)(3)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

agency commission do not form part of export turnover eligible for claiming exemption u/s. 10A of the Act. 3. In alternative and without prejudice to this ground, the assessee has also raised additional ground by which it … of deduction u/s. 10A. Based on these facts, the AO recomputed the allowable deduction u/s. 10A at Rs. 87,45,136/-. The AO found that the assessee has claimed deduction u/s. 10A at Rs. 1,75,45,047/-. The AO was of

Date of Decision : 8.3.2013 Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court: Punjab and Haryana

High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl.Misc.not M- 299 of 2013 (O&M) Date of decision :8. 3.2013 Sanjeev Kumar @ Sandeep Kumar ......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE SABINA Present:

Janakpuri and Which Was Duly Received on 8.3.2014 in Vs. State of Hary ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M No.42971 of 2013 2 Janakpuri and which was duly received on 8.3.2014 in which requisite instructions had been passed on to the bank for opening of bank locker No.1580 i.e.jointly

SKR BPO Services (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer-8(3)(2)

Court: Mumbai

interference is called for as the Assessing Officer has wide power to re-open an assessment within four years. 8. We find that the issue arising in the present Petition namely seeking to bring to tax the share … stage of admission. 2. This Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenges a notice dated 31st March, 2014 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) passed by the Assessing

Shree Shyam Kamal Industries (P) Vs. Ito, Coy. Ward 8(3)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (2005)4SOT146(Delhi)

Co. (P) Ltd. v. CIT ( 1970) 78 ITR 466 (SC), CIT v. Gillanders Arbuthnot & Co. (1973) 87 ITR 407 (SC), Kantamani Venkata Narayana & Sons v. First Addl. (1967) 63 ITR 638 (SC) and Sowdagar … as originally assessed. Relying upon the judgments in Hamilton & Co. (P) Ltd. v. CIT (1992) 194 ITR 391 (Cal); In re Jagtar Singh Purewal (1995) 213 ITR 512 (AAR) and decision of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,